Duties and Obligations of Sheriffs
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 762 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 762.
You're tracking SB 762
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 762 — Duties and Obligations of Sheriffs
Last action — Died in Appropriations
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
36 added · 39 removed36 line(s) added, 39 removed.
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for SB 762 By Senatorthe GrutersCommittee 23-00574-19on 2019762__Judiciary; A bill to be entitled An act relating to trial court security;
and Senator Gruters 590-03468-19 2019762c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to duties and obligations of sheriffs;
requiring sheriffseach sheriff to providecoordinate securitywith certain boards of county commissioners and chief judges to develop a comprehensive plan for security of trial court facilities;
requiringspecifying that sheriffs toand coordinate with the chief judgejudges on security matters for trial court facilities and to retain operationalcertain controlauthorities; over how they provide security for such facilities;
specifying that thesheriffs chiefand judgetheir retainsdeputies, certainemployees, decision-makingand authority;contractors are officers of the court under specified circumstances;
specifying that sheriffs and their deputies, employees, and contractors are officers of the court when providing security for trial court facilities;
providing construction;
1513 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
1715 Section 1. Subsection (4) is added to section 30.15, Florida Statutes, to read:
30.15 Powers, duties, and obligations.— (4)(a) Sheriffs,(4)(a) In inaccordance theirwith respectiveeach counties,county’s shallobligation provideunder securitys. for trial court facilities.
Sheriffs14, shallArt. coordinate with the chief judge of the judicial circuit in which their county is located on all security matters for such facilities, but shall retain operational control over the manner in which security is provided.
TheV chief judge of the judicialState circuitConstitution shall retain decision-making authority to ensure the protection of due process rights, including, but not limited to, the scheduling and conduct of trials and other judicial proceedings, as part of his or her responsibility for the administrative supervision of the trial courts under s.
29.008 to fund security for trial court facilities, the sheriff of each county shall coordinate with the board of county commissioners of that county and the chief judge of the circuit in which that county is located on the development of a comprehensive plan for the provision of security for trial court facilities.
Each sheriff shall retain authority over the implementation and provision of law enforcement services associated with the plan.
The chief judge of the circuit shall retain decision-making authority to ensure the protection of due process rights, including, but not limited to, the scheduling and conduct of trial and other judicial proceedings as part of his or her responsibility for the administrative supervision of trial courts under s.
(c) This subsection may not be construed to affect or erode the authority of counties under s.
14, Art.
V of the State Constitution or s.
29.008 to otherwise fund security of facilities as the term “security” is defined in s.
29.008(1)(e).
View plain text versions (2)
- S 762 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 762 Filed html
Action History
-
Died in Appropriations
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Now in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee Recommendation: Favorable by Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice, 04/16/19, 9:00 am, 37 Senate Building
-
Now in Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice
-
Favorable by Infrastructure and Security; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
On Committee agenda-- Infrastructure and Security, 04/02/19, 2:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Now in Infrastructure and Security
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 6 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 03/25/19, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Judiciary; Infrastructure and Security; Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice; Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Joe Gruters · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gruters, Joe Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 762?
- SB 762 is sponsored by Gruters, Joe (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 762?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 762?
- Track SB 762 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 762
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 762
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →