HB 751 — Duty of Good Faith
Last action — Died in Government Operations and Technology Appropriations Subcommittee
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
69 added · 130 removed69 line(s) added, 130 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 751 2019 A bill to be entitled An act relating to duty of good faith;
providing procedures for administrative hearing of complaints;
providing procedures for judicial review of administrative orders;
authorizing rulemaking by the Division of Administrative Hearings;
providing for judicial enforcement;
Page1. 1 of 5 CODING:
Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests;
Page 1 of 3 CODING:
hb0751-00hb0751-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 751 2019 1.1.2.
Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests;
1.2.
(2)(a)(2) This section applies to any allegation:
Page(a) 2That an insurance company has not complied with the duty of 5good CODING:faith.
(b) Recognized in general law or common law.
(c) Filed by an insured or a third-party beneficiary to an Page 2 of 3 CODING:
hb0751-00hb0751-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 751 2019 1.insurance contract.
That an insurance company has not complied with the duty of good faith.
2.
Recognized in general law or common law.
3.
Filed by an insured or a third-party beneficiary to an insurance contract.
(b) This section provides the sole legal remedy for any allegation described in this subsection.
If the department Page 3 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0751-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 751 2019 determines the complaint meets the requirements of subsection (4), it shall refer the complaint to the Division of Administrative Hearings for a hearing, and the following procedures will apply:
(a) The department shall provide written notice to the insurer that the complaint is being referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings.
(b) Within 90 days after the Division of Administrative Hearings receives the complaint, an administrative law judge shall hold a hearing to determine if there has been a breach of duty and if there are any damages.
(c) Within 30 days after the date of the hearing, the administrative law judge shall enter an order, which must, at a minimum, include:
1.
Findings of fact, including a determination of whether the insurer violated the duty of good faith, and if so, a determination of the amount of damages.
2.
Conclusions of law.
3.
A statement of the right to appeal the order pursuant to subsection (6).
(d) In conducting the hearing under this subsection, the administrative law judge is not bound by technical or formal rules of procedure but may conduct the hearing in such manner as to best ascertain the rights of the parties.
(6) Either party may seek review of an order of an Page 4 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0751-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 751 2019 administrative law judge entered pursuant to this section, which shall be by appeal to the First District Court of Appeal.
Show all 47 changed lines (7 more)
The appeal shall be filed in accordance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The department shall be given notice of any appellate proceedings in the district court and shall have the right to intervene in such proceedings.
(7) The Division of Administrative Hearings may adopt rules to establish procedures for hearings governed by this section.
(8) Within 30 days after an administrative law judge enters an order pursuant to this section, the insurer must pay damages as required by the order, unless the insurer appeals the order, in which case the insurer must pay damages within 30 days after all appeals are final.
(9) If an insurer does not timely pay damages as required under subsection (8), any circuit court of this state within the jurisdiction of which the insurer resides or transacts business, upon application by an aggrieved party, may issue an order directing the insurer to show cause why a writ of execution, or such other process as may be necessary to enforce the terms of such order, shall not be issued, and, unless such cause is shown, the court may issue a writ of execution or such other process or final order as may be necessary to enforce the terms of such order of the administrative law judge.
Page 53 of 53 CODING:
hb0751-00hb0751-01-c1
Show all 47 changed rows (7 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- H 751 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 751 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Died in Government Operations and Technology Appropriations Subcommittee
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Now in Government Operations and Technology Appropriations Subcommittee
-
CS by Civil Justice Subcommittee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS by Civil Justice Subcommittee; YEAS 11 NAYS 5
-
On Committee agenda-- Civil Justice Subcommittee, 03/13/19, 8:30 am, Sumner Hall
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Civil Justice Subcommittee; Government Operations and Technology Appropriations Subcommittee; Judiciary Committee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Robert Alexander "Alex" Andrade · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diamond | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mercado | — | Nay |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Toledo | — | Yea |
| Bell | — | Yea |
| Beltran | — | Yea |
| Grant, M. | — | Yea |
| Omphroy | — | Nay |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Nay |
| Antone, Bruce Hadley | Democrat | Nay |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 751?
- HB 751 is sponsored by Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 751?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 751?
- Track HB 751 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 751
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 751
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →