Florida 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 262 — Child Welfare

Last action — Chapter No. 2019-128

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

483 added · 501 removed

483 line(s) added, 501 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2019 SB 262 By Senator Albritton 26-00454-19 2019262__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to child welfare;
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for SB 262 By the Committee on Judiciary;
and Senator Albritton 590-02492-19 2019262c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to child welfare;
expanding the purpose of ch.
39, F.S.;
requiring the court during an adjudicatory hearing to advise parents in plain language of certain requirements to achieve reunification with their child;
requiring the court during an adjudicatory hearing to advise parents in plain language of certain requirements to achieve permanency with their child;
62 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
61 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
64 Section 1. Subsection (7) of section 39.001, Florida Statutes, is amended, paragraph (q) is added to subsection (1) of that section, and paragraph (j) is added to subsection (3) of that section, to read:
63 Section 1. Subsection (7) of section 39.001, Florida Statutes, is amended, and paragraph (j) is added to subsection (3) of that section, to read:
personnel standards and screening.— (1) PURPOSES OF CHAPTER.—The purposes of this chapter are:
personnel standards and screening.— (3) GENERAL PROTECTIONS FOR CHILDREN.—It is a purpose of the Legislature that the children of this state be provided with the following protections:
(q) To recognize the responsibility of:
1. The parent from whose custody a child has been taken to take action to comply with the case plan so reunification with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child.
2. The department and its community-based care providers to make reasonable efforts to finalize a family’s permanency plan, including assisting parents with developing strategies to overcome barriers to case plan compliance.
3. The court to affirmatively determine what the barriers are to timely reunification and address such barriers as frequently as needed to ensure compliance with the time limitations established in this chapter.
(3) GENERAL PROTECTIONS FOR CHILDREN.—It is a purpose of the Legislature that the children of this state be provided with the following protections:
Therefore, parents must take action to comply with the case plan so reunification with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child, including by notifying the parties and the court of barriers to case plan compliance.
Therefore, parents must take action to comply with the case plan so permanency with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child, including by notifying the parties and the court of barriers to case plan compliance.
(18) The court shall advise the parents in plain language what is expected of them to achieve reunification with their child, including that:, (a) Parents must take action to comply with the case plan so reunification with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child.
(18) The court shall advise the parents in plain language what is expected of them to achieve reunification with their child, including that:, (a) Parents must take action to comply with the case plan so permanency with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child.
The court shall advise the parents in plain language that:, 1. Parents must take action to comply with the case plan so reunification with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child.
The court shall advise the parents in plain language that:, 1. Parents must take action to comply with the case plan so permanency with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child.
(e)  A written notice to the parent that it is the parent’s responsibility to take action to comply with the case plan so reunification with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child;
(e)  A written notice to the parent that it is the parent’s responsibility to take action to comply with the case plan so permanency with the child may occur within the shortest period of time possible, but no later than 1 year after removal or adjudication of the child;
the parent must notify the parties and the court in writing of barriers to completing case plan tasks within a reasonable time after discovering such barriers if the parties are not actively working to overcome them;
the parent must notify the parties and the court of barriers to completing case plan tasks within a reasonable time after discovering such barriers if the parties are not actively working to overcome them;
The department shall explain the strategies included in the plan which the parent can use to overcome barriers to case plan compliance and shall explain that if a barrier is discovered and the parties are not actively working to overcome such barrier, the parent must notify the parties and the court in writing within a reasonable time after discovering such barrier.
The department shall explain the strategies included in the plan which the parent can use to overcome barriers to case plan compliance and shall explain that if a barrier is discovered and the parties are not actively working to overcome such barrier, the parent must notify the parties and the court within a reasonable time after discovering such barrier.
8. Strategies to overcome barriers to case plan compliance and an explanation that the parent must notify the parties and the court in writing within a reasonable time after discovering a barrier that the parties are not actively working to overcome such barrier.
8. Strategies to overcome barriers to case plan compliance and an explanation that the parent must notify the parties and the court within a reasonable time after discovering a barrier that the parties are not actively working to overcome such barrier.
(a) If, after a child has achieved the permanency placement approved at the permanency hearing, a parent who has not had his or her parental rights terminated makes a motion for reunification or increased contact with the child, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the dependency case should be reopened and whether there should be a modification of the order.
(a) If, after a child is residing in the permanent placement approved at the permanency hearing, a parent who has not had his or her parental rights terminated makes a motion for reunification or increased contact with the child, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether the dependency case should be reopened and whether there should be a modification of the order.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Chapter No. 2019-128

  2. Approved by Governor

  3. Signed by Officers and presented to Governor

  4. Ordered enrolled

  5. CS passed; YEAS 112 NAYS 0

  6. Read 3rd time

  7. Placed on 3rd reading

  8. Read 2nd time

  9. Received

  10. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/29/19

  11. Referred to Calendar

  12. In Messages

  13. CS passed as amended; YEAS 39 NAYS 0 -SJ 572, 573

  14. Read 3rd time

  15. Placed on 3rd reading

  16. Ordered engrossed

  17. Amendment(s) adopted (452716, 461946)

  18. Read 2nd time

  19. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/25/19

  20. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  21. Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 17 NAYS 0

  22. CS by Judiciary read 1st time

  23. Introduced

  24. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/06/19, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Building

  25. Now in Rules

  26. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  27. CS by Judiciary; YEAS 6 NAYS 0

  28. On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/19/19, 12:30 pm, 110 Senate Building

  29. Now in Judiciary

  30. Favorable by Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; YEAS 7 NAYS 0

  31. On Committee agenda-- Children, Families, and Elder Affairs, 02/04/19, 4:00 pm, 301 Senate Building

  32. Referred to Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; Judiciary; Rules

  33. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passage, Third Reading

Passed 112 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 11000
Unaffiliated 77004
Republican 24001
Total 112005
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (117)
Member Party Vote
Ausley — Yea
Brown — Yea
Byrd — Yea
Cummings — Not Voting
Diamond — Yea
Donalds — Yea
DuBose — Yea
Drake — Yea
Duran — Yea
Eagle — Yea
Fine — Yea
Fischer — Yea
Geller — Yea
Good — Yea
Hill — Yea
Ingoglia — Yea
Jacobs — Not Voting
Jacquet — Yea
Jenne — Yea
Killebrew — Yea
Magar — Yea
Mariano — Yea
McGhee — Yea
Mercado — Yea
Newton — Yea
Oliva — Yea
Payne — Yea
Pigman — Yea
Ponder — Yea
Pritchett — Yea
Renner — Yea
Rommel — Yea
Roth — Not Voting
Santiago — Yea
Silvers — Yea
Sprowls — Yea
Stevenson — Yea
Stone — Yea
Toledo — Yea
Tomkow — Yea
Willhite — Yea
Williamson — Yea
Alexander — Yea
Aloupis — Yea
Altman — Yea
Grant, J. — Yea
Raschein — Yea
Roach — Yea
Grieco — Yea
Robinson — Yea
Bell — Yea
Hage — Yea
Rodrigues, R. — Yea
Beltran — Yea
Hart — Yea
Hattersley — Yea
Sabatini — Yea
Bush — Yea
Caruso — Yea
Casello — Yea
Slosberg — Yea
Clemons — Yea
Cortes — Yea
Latvala — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Valdes — Yea
Fernandez — Yea
Omphroy — Yea
Watson, B. — Yea
Fernandez-Barquin — Yea
Watson, C. — Yea
Fetterhoff — Yea
Webb — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fitzenhagen — Yea
Goff-Marcil — Yea
Polo — Yea
Zika — Yea
Grant, M. — Not Voting
La Rosa — Yea
Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" — Yea
Antone, Bruce Hadley Democrat Yea
Daniels, Kimberly Democrat Yea
Davis, Tracie Democrat Yea
Driskell, Fentrice Democrat Yea
Eskamani, Dr. Anna V. Democrat Yea
Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" Democrat Yea
Gregory, Emily Democrat Yea
Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat Yea
Joseph, Dotie Democrat Yea
Polsky, Tina Scott Democrat Yea
Smith, Carlos Guillermo Democrat Yea
Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" Republican Yea
Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" Republican Yea
Buchanan, James Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Duggan, Wyman Republican Yea
Grall, Erin Republican Yea
Johnson, Chad Republican Yea
LaMarca, Chip Republican Yea
Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" Republican Yea
Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. Republican Yea
McClain, Stan Republican Yea
McClure, Lawrence Republican Yea
Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" Republican Yea
Perez, Daniel Republican Yea
Plakon, Rachel Saunders Republican Yea
Plasencia, Susan Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Sirois, Tyler I. Republican Yea
Smith, David Republican Yea
Stark, Paula A. Republican Yea
Trumbull, Jay Republican Not Voting
Vacant Republican Yea
Yarborough, Clay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Democrat 2000
Unaffiliated 27001
No Party Affiliation 1000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Book — Yea
Bracy — Yea
Broxson — Yea
Cruz — Yea
Diaz — Yea
Farmer — Yea
Gainer — Yea
Hutson — Not Voting
Powell — Yea
Stewart — Yea
Taddeo — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Torres — Yea
Simpson — Yea
Stargel — Yea
Lee — Yea
Brandes — Yea
Braynon — Yea
Montford — Yea
Perry — Yea
Galvano — Yea
Flores — Yea
Rader — Yea
Baxley — Yea
Bean — Yea
Gibson — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Simmons — Yea
Berman, Lori Democrat Yea
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Yea
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Yea
Albritton, Ben Republican Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Gruters, Joe Republican Yea
Harrell, Gayle Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Mayfield, Debbie Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Wright, Tom A. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Favorable

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14000
Republican 3000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Book — Yea
Farmer — Yea
Hutson — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Brandes — Yea
Braynon — Yea
Flores — Yea
Lee — Yea
Montford — Yea
Simmons — Yea
Simpson — Yea
Stargel — Yea
Gibson — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 262?
SB 262 is sponsored by Albritton, Ben (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 262?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 262?
Track SB 262 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 262

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 262

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →