SB 76 — Driving While Using a Wireless Communications Device
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 107 (Ch. 2019-44)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
200 added · 91 removed200 line(s) added, 91 removed.
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for SB 76 By Senator Simpson 10-00079-19 201976__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to the useCommittee ofon wirelessInfrastructure communicationsand devicesSecurity; while driving;
and Senators Simpson, Passidomo, Hooper, Mayfield, Book, Rouson, Berman, Perry, Taddeo, and Cruz 596-02505-19 201976c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to driving while distracted;
defining the term “driving while distracted”;
redefining the term “wireless communications device”;
prohibiting a person from operating a motor vehicle whilewhen listeningdriving orwhile talkingdistracted; on a wireless communications device for the purpose of voice interpersonal communication;
redefiningauthorizing thea termlaw “wirelessenforcement communicationsofficer device”during a specified period to includestop voicemotor communications;vehicles to issue warnings to persons who are driving while distracted;
conformingproviding provisionsfor torepeal changesof madea byprovision; the act;
requiringauthorizing deposita oflaw finesenforcement intoofficer, theafter Emergencya Medicalspecified Servicesdate, Trustto Fund;stop motor vehicles and issue citations to persons who are driving while distracted;
revising exceptions to such prohibition;
revising crash results for which a user’s billing records for a wireless communications device or the testimony of or written statements from certain authorities are admissible as evidence;
requiring that law enforcement officers indicate specified information in the uniform traffic citation;
providing penalties for driving while distracted;
authorizing participation in a distracted driving safety program for a first offense, in lieu of specified penalties;
authorizing a clerk of the court to dismiss a case and assess court costs under certain circumstances;
requiring the deposit of fines into the Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund;
providingauthorizing anthe effectiveDepartment date.of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, in consultation with the Department of Transportation, to implement a statewide campaign to raise awareness and prevent drivers from driving while distracted;
17authorizing Bethe Itdepartment Enactedto byuse thecertain Legislaturemessaging ofto implement the Statecampaign; of Florida:
19authorizing Sectionthe 1. Subsectiondepartment (1),to paragraphscontract (b)with andcertain (d)entities offor subsectioncertain (2),purposes; and subsections (3) and (5) of section 316.305, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
316.305 Wirelessproviding communicationscontract devices;authority;
prohibition.—providing (1) Thiseffective sectiondates. may be cited as the “Florida Ban on Wireless Communications Devices Texting While Driving Law.” (2) It is the intent of the Legislature to:
(b) Prevent40 crashesBe relatedIt toEnacted by the actLegislature of usingthe aState wirelessof communicationsFlorida: device text messaging while driving a motor vehicle.
(d) Authorize42 lawSection enforcement1. Effective officersOctober to1, stop2019, motorsection vehicles316.305, andFlorida issueStatutes, citationsis asamended a secondary offense to personsread: who are using a wireless communications device texting while driving.
(3)(a) A316.305 Driving person may not operate a motor vehicle while manuallydistracted typingWireless or entering multiple letters, numbers, symbols, or other characters into a wireless communications devicedevices; or while sending or reading data or listening or talking on such a device for the purpose of nonvoice or voice interpersonal communication, including, but not limited to, communication methods known as texting, e-mailing, and instant messaging.
Asprohibition.— used(1) This insection thismay section,be cited as the term“Florida “wirelessDriving communicationsBan device”on meansTexting anyWhile handheldDistracted deviceDriving usedLaw.” or(2) For capablepurposes of beingthis usedsection, in a handheld manner which, that is designed or intended to receive or transmit text or character-based messages, access or store data, or connect to the Internetterm: or any communications service as defined in s.
812.15(a) “Driving andwhile whichdistracted” thatmeans allowsthe textinattentive andoperation voiceof communications.a motor vehicle.
Inattentive or distracted driving conduct includes reading, writing, performing personal grooming, applying a beauty aid or similar products, interacting with pets or unsecured cargo, using a personal wireless communications device, or engaging in any other activity, conduct, task, or action that causes distraction.
(b) “Wireless communications device” means any handheld device that is designed or intended to receive or transmit text- or character-based messages, to record or view images, to access or store data, or to connect to the Internet or any communications service, as defined in s.
812.15, or which allows text communications.
The term includes, but is not limited to, a cell phone, a tablet, a laptop, a two-way messaging device, or an electronic game that is used or capable of being used in a handheld manner.
The term does not include a safety, security, or convenience feature built into a motor vehicle which does not require the use of a handheld device.
(3)(2) It is the intent of the Legislature to:
(a) Improve roadway safety for all vehicle operators, vehicle passengers, bicyclists, pedestrians, and other road users.
(b) Prevent crashes related to the act of driving while distracted when operating text messaging while driving a motor vehicle.
(c) Reduce injuries, deaths, property damage, health care costs, health insurance rates, and automobile insurance rates related to motor vehicle crashes.
(d) Authorize law enforcement officers to stop motor vehicles and issue citations as a secondary offense to persons who are texting while driving while distracted as provided in subsection (4).
(4)(3)(a)1. A person may not operate a motor vehicle when driving while distracted while manually typing or entering multiple letters, numbers, symbols, or other characters into a wireless communications device or while sending or reading data on such a device for the purpose of nonvoice interpersonal communication, including, but not limited to, communication methods known as texting, e-mailing, and instant messaging.
As used in this section, the term “wireless communications device” means any handheld device used or capable of being used in a handheld manner, that is designed or intended to receive or transmit text or character-based messages, access or store data, or connect to the Internet or any communications service as defined in s.
812.15 and that allows text communications.
2.a. During the period of October 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, a law enforcement officer may stop motor vehicles to issue verbal or written warnings to persons who are driving while distracted for the purposes of informing and educating such persons.
This sub-subparagraph shall stand repealed on October 1, 2020.
Show all 62 changed lines (22 more)
b. After December 31, 2019, a law enforcement officer may stop motor vehicles and issue citations to persons who are driving while distracted.
4. Using a device or system in a hands-free manner for navigation purposes.
5. Conducting5. Using a wireless communications device hands-free or hands-free in voice-operated mode, including, but not limited to, a factory-installed or after-market Bluetooth device Conducting wireless interpersonal communication that does not require manual entry of multiple letters, numbers, or symbols, except to activate, deactivate, or initiate a feature or function.
5.7. Operating6.7. Operating an autonomous vehicle, as defined in s.
(c) Only in the event of a crash resulting in death or personalserious bodily injury, a user’s billing records for a wireless communications device or the testimony of or written statements from appropriate authorities receiving such messages may be admissible as evidencedefined in anys. proceeding to determine whether a violation of paragraph (a) has been committed.
(5) Notwithstanding316.027 s.personal injury, a user’s billing records for a wireless communications device or the testimony of or written statements from appropriate authorities receiving such messages may be admissible as evidence in any proceeding to determine whether a violation of paragraph (a) has been committed.
(d) Law enforcement officers must indicate the type of distraction in the comment section of the uniform traffic citation.
(5)(4)(a) Any person who violates this section commits a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a moving violation, as provided in chapter 318, and shall have 3 points assessed against his or her driver license as set forth in s.
322.27.
For a first offense under this section, in lieu of the penalty specified in s.
318.18 and the assessment of points, a person who violates this section may elect to participate in a distracted driving safety program approved by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.
Upon completion of such program, the penalty specified in s.
318.18 and associated costs may be waived by the clerk of the court and the assessment of points must be waived Any person who violates paragraph (3)(a) commits a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a nonmoving violation as provided in chapter 318.
(b) The clerk of the court may dismiss a case and assess court costs in accordance with s.
318.18(11)(a) for a nonmoving traffic infraction for a person who is cited for a first time violation of this section if the inattentive or distracted driving conduct resulting in the violation is for the use of a personal wireless communications device and the person shows the clerk proof of purchase of equipment that enables his or her personal wireless communications device to be used in a hands free manner Any person who commits a second or subsequent violation of paragraph (3)(a) within 5 years after the date of a prior conviction for a violation of paragraph (3)(a) commits a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a moving violation as provided in chapter 318.
(6)(5) Notwithstanding s.
318.18 for aviolations violation of this section shallmust be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund of the Department of Health Enforcement of this section by state or local law enforcement agencies must be accomplished only as a secondary action when an operator of a motor vehicle has been detained for a suspected violation of another provision of this chapter, chapter 320, or chapter 322.
Section 2. This2. (1) The actDepartment shallof takeHighway effectSafety Octoberand 1,Motor 2019.Vehicles, in consultation with the Department of Transportation, may implement a statewide campaign to raise awareness and prevent drivers from driving while distracted.
The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles may use television messaging, radio broadcasts, print media, digital strategies, social media, and any other form of messaging deemed necessary and appropriate by the department to implement the campaign.
(2) The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles may contract with counties, local law enforcement agencies, safety councils, and public schools to assist with planning and conducting the statewide driving while distracted safety and public awareness campaign in a manner that encourages compliance with s.
316.305, Florida Statutes.
Section 3. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this act, this act shall take effect July 1, 2019.
Show all 62 changed rows (22 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- S 76 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 76 Filed html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 107 (Ch. 2019-44)
-
Substituted CS/HB 107
-
Read 3rd time
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
CS/CS/CS/CS by Rules read 1st time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/23/19
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS/CS/CS by- Rules; YEAS 15 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/17/19, 2:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS/CS/CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS/CS by Judiciary; YEAS 5 NAYS 1
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 03/25/19, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS/CS by Innovation, Industry, and Technology read 1st time
-
Now in Judiciary
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Innovation, Industry, and Technology; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
-
CS by Infrastructure and Security read 1st time
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Innovation, Industry, and Technology, 03/06/19, 10:30 am, 110 Senate Building
-
Now in Innovation, Industry, and Technology
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Infrastructure and Security; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Infrastructure and Security, 02/19/19, 4:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Referred to Infrastructure and Security; Innovation, Industry, and Technology; Judiciary; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Simpson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Simpson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Book | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Not Voting |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Not Voting |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Not Voting |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 76?
- SB 76 is sponsored by Simpson.
- What is the current status of SB 76?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 76?
- Track SB 76 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 76
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 76
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →