Florida 2019 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 226 — Mastery-based Education

Last action — Died in Appropriations

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

212 added · 168 removed

212 line(s) added, 168 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2019 SB 226 By Senator Brandes 24-00392-19 2019226__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to mastery-based education;
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for SB 226 By the Committee on Education;
and Senator Brandes 581-02949-19 2019226c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mastery-based education;
authorizing a district school board participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program to award credit based on student mastery of certain content and skills;
authorizing a district school board or developmental research school participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program to award credit based on student mastery of certain content and skills;
authorizing a district school board participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program to use an alternative interpretation of letter grades for certain students;
authorizing a district school board or developmental research school participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program to use an alternative interpretation of letter grades for certain students;
requiring participating district school boards and developmental research schools to use the current 4-point scale in determining student grade point averages;
authorizing public school districts to submit applications for the program;
authorizing public school districts and developmental research schools to submit applications for the program;
authorizing participating school districts to amend their applications to include alternatives for the award of credits and interpretation of letter grades;
authorizing participating school districts and developmental research schools to amend their applications to include alternatives for the award of credits and interpretation of letter grades;
requiring the statewide articulation agreement to ensure fair and equitable access for certain students with mastery-based, nontraditional diplomas and transcripts;
requiring the statewide articulation agreement to ensure fair and equitable access for students who have earned high school credit through mastery-based education and graduate with a standard high school diploma;
24 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
30 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
26 Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of section 1003.436, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
32 Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of section 1003.436, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
However, district school boards participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program under s.
However, district school boards and developmental research schools participating in the Mastery Based Education Pilot Program under s.
1003.437 Middle and high school grading system.— (1) The grading system and interpretation of letter grades used to measure student success in grade 6 through grade 12 courses for students in public schools are shall be as follows:
1003.437 Middle and high school grading system.— (1) The grading system and interpretation of letter grades used to measure student success in grade 6 through grade 12 courses for students in public schools is shall be as follows:
(a)(1) Grade “A” equals 90 percent through 100 percent, has a grade point average value of 4, and is defined as “outstanding progress.” (b)(2) Grade “B” equals 80 percent through 89 percent, has a grade point average value of 3, and is defined as “above average progress.” (c)(3) Grade “C” equals 70 percent through 79 percent, has a grade point average value of 2, and is defined as “average progress.” (d)(4) Grade “D” equals 60 percent through 69 percent, has a grade point average value of 1, and is defined as “lowest acceptable progress.” (e)(5) Grade “F” equals zero percent through 59 percent, has a grade point average value of zero, and is defined as “failure.” (f)(6) Grade “I” equals zero percent, has a grade point average value of zero, and is defined as “incomplete.” (2) District school boards participating in the Mastery Based Education Pilot Program under s.
(a)(1) Grade “A” equals 90 percent through 100 percent, has a grade point average value of 4, and is defined as “outstanding progress.” (b)(2) Grade “B” equals 80 percent through 89 percent, has a grade point average value of 3, and is defined as “above average progress.” (c)(3) Grade “C” equals 70 percent through 79 percent, has a grade point average value of 2, and is defined as “average progress.” (d)(4) Grade “D” equals 60 percent through 69 percent, has a grade point average value of 1, and is defined as “lowest acceptable progress.” (e)(5) Grade “F” equals zero percent through 59 percent, has a grade point average value of zero, and is defined as “failure.” (f)(6) Grade “I” equals zero percent, has a grade point average value of zero, and is defined as “incomplete.” (2) A district school board and a developmental research school participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program under s.
1003.4996 may use an alternative interpretation of letter grades to measure student success in grade 6 through grade 12.
1003.4996 may use an alternative interpretation of letter grades to measure student success in grade 6 through grade 12;
78 For the purposes of class ranking, district school boards may exercise a weighted grading system pursuant to s.
however, the school board and developmental research school must continue to use the 4-point scale established in subsection (1) for calculating a student’s grade point average.
88 For the purposes of class ranking, district school boards may exercise a weighted grading system pursuant to s.
1003.4996 Mastery-Based Competency-Based Education Pilot Program.—Beginning with the 2016-2017 school year, The Mastery Based Competency-Based Education Pilot Program is created within the Department of Education to be administered for a period of 5 years.
1003.4996 Mastery-Based Competency-Based Education Pilot Program.—Beginning with the 2016-2017 school year, the Mastery Based Competency-Based Education Pilot Program is created within the Department of Education to be administered for a period of 5 years.
(1) PARTICIPATION.—The P.K.
(1) PARTICIPATION.—Developmental research schools established under s.
Yonge Developmental Research School and public school districts, including, but not limited to, the Lake, Palm Beach, Pinellas, and Seminole County School Districts, may submit an application in a format prescribed by the department to participate in the pilot program.
1002.32, including the P.K.
Yonge Developmental Research School, and public school districts, including, but not limited to, the Lake, Palm Beach, Pinellas, and Seminole County School Districts, may submit an application in a format prescribed by the department to participate in the pilot program.
(4) ALTERNATIVE CREDIT AND LETTER GRADE SYSTEMS.— (a) Beginning with the 2019-2020 school year, participating school districts may amend their applications to include alternatives for awarding credit, as authorized under s.
(4) ALTERNATIVE CREDIT AND LETTER GRADE SYSTEMS.— (a) Beginning with the 2019-2020 school year, participating school districts and developmental research schools may amend their applications to include alternatives for awarding credit, as authorized under s.
2. Alternatives to the interpretation of middle school and high school letter grades may substitute the applicable language from the school district’s rigorous scoring rubric.
A participating school district and developmental research school must amend its student progression plan required by s.
(b) An application that is amended pursuant to this subsection must be approved by the district school board.
1008.25 to conform to the alternative awarding of credits pursuant to this section.
2. Alternatives to the interpretation of middle school and high school letter grades may substitute the applicable language from the school district’s rigorous scoring rubric;
however, participating school districts and developmental research schools must continue to use the 4-point scale established in s.
1003.437(1) for calculating a student’s grade point average.
(b) An application that is amended pursuant to this subsection must be approved by the district school board or developmental research school governing authority, as applicable.
Section 4. Subsection (7) is added to section 1007.23, Florida Statutes, to read:
Section 4. Subsection (1) of section 1007.23, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
1007.23 Statewide articulation agreement.— (7) The articulation agreement must ensure fair and equitable access for high school graduates with mastery-based, nontraditional diplomas and transcripts.
1007.23 Statewide articulation agreement.— (1) The State Board of Education and the Board of Governors shall enter into a statewide articulation agreement which the State Board of Education shall adopt by rule.
The agreement must preserve Florida’s “2+2” system of articulation, facilitate the seamless articulation of student credit across and among Florida’s educational entities, and reinforce the provisions of this chapter by governing:
(a) Articulation between secondary and postsecondary education, including fair and equitable access for students who have earned high school credit through a mastery-based education program pursuant to s.
1003.4996 and graduate with a standard high school diploma;
(b) Admission of associate in arts degree graduates from Florida College System institutions and state universities;
(c) Admission of applied technology diploma program graduates from Florida College System institutions or career centers;
(d) Admission of associate in science degree and associate in applied science degree graduates from Florida College System institutions;
(e) The use of acceleration mechanisms, including nationally standardized examinations through which students may earn credit;
(f) General education requirements and statewide course numbers as provided for in ss.
1007.24 and 1007.25;
and (g) Articulation among programs in nursing.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Died in Appropriations

  2. Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

  3. Now in Appropriations

  4. Subcommittee Recommendation: CS/CS by Appropriations Subcommittee on Education; YEAS 7 NAYS 0

  5. On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Subcommittee on Education, 04/04/19, 10:00 am, 412 Knott Building

  6. CS by Education read 1st time

  7. Now in Appropriations Subcommittee on Education

  8. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  9. CS by Education; YEAS 8 NAYS 0

  10. On Committee agenda-- Education, 03/12/19, 1:30 pm, 412 Knott Building

  11. Introduced

  12. Referred to Education; Appropriations Subcommittee on Education; Appropriations

  13. Filed

Sponsors

  • Brandes · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Brandes

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6001
No Party Affiliation 1000
Total 7001
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Book — Yea
Diaz — Not Voting
Baxley — Yea
Flores — Yea
Montford — Yea
Simmons — Yea
Stargel — Yea
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 1000
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 8000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Cruz — Yea
Diaz — Yea
Baxley — Yea
Perry — Yea
Simmons — Yea
Stargel — Yea
Montford — Yea
Berman, Lori Democrat Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 226?
SB 226 is sponsored by Brandes.
What is the current status of SB 226?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 226?
Track SB 226 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 226

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 226

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →