Mastery-based Education
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 226 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 226.
You're tracking SB 226
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 226 — Mastery-based Education
Last action — Died in Appropriations
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
212 added · 168 removed212 line(s) added, 168 removed.
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for SB 226 By Senatorthe BrandesCommittee 24-00392-19on 2019226__Education; A bill to be entitled An act relating to mastery-based education;
and Senator Brandes 581-02949-19 2019226c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mastery-based education;
authorizing a district school board or developmental research school participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program to award credit based on student mastery of certain content and skills;
authorizing a district school board or developmental research school participating in the Mastery-Based Education Pilot Program to use an alternative interpretation of letter grades for certain students;
requiring participating district school boards and developmental research schools to use the current 4-point scale in determining student grade point averages;
authorizing public school districts and developmental research schools to submit applications for the program;
authorizing participating school districts and developmental research schools to amend their applications to include alternatives for the award of credits and interpretation of letter grades;
requiring the statewide articulation agreement to ensure fair and equitable access for certain students withwho mastery-based,have nontraditionalearned diplomashigh school credit through mastery-based education and transcripts;graduate with a standard high school diploma;
2430 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
2632 Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of section 1003.436, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
However, district school boards and developmental research schools participating in the Mastery-BasedMastery Based Education Pilot Program under s.
1003.437 Middle and high school grading system.— (1) The grading system and interpretation of letter grades used to measure student success in grade 6 through grade 12 courses for students in public schools areis shall be as follows:
(a)(1) Grade “A” equals 90 percent through 100 percent, has a grade point average value of 4, and is defined as “outstanding progress.” (b)(2) Grade “B” equals 80 percent through 89 percent, has a grade point average value of 3, and is defined as “above average progress.” (c)(3) Grade “C” equals 70 percent through 79 percent, has a grade point average value of 2, and is defined as “average progress.” (d)(4) Grade “D” equals 60 percent through 69 percent, has a grade point average value of 1, and is defined as “lowest acceptable progress.” (e)(5) Grade “F” equals zero percent through 59 percent, has a grade point average value of zero, and is defined as “failure.” (f)(6) Grade “I” equals zero percent, has a grade point average value of zero, and is defined as “incomplete.” (2) District(2) A district school boardsboard and a developmental research school participating in the MasteryMastery-Based Based Education Pilot Program under s.
1003.4996 may use an alternative interpretation of letter grades to measure student success in grade 6 through grade 12.12;
78however, For the purposesschool ofboard classand ranking,developmental districtresearch school boardsmust maycontinue exerciseto ause weightedthe grading4-point systemscale pursuantestablished toin s.subsection (1) for calculating a student’s grade point average.
88 For the purposes of class ranking, district school boards may exercise a weighted grading system pursuant to s.
1003.4996 Mastery-Based Competency-Based Education Pilot Program.—Beginning with the 2016-2017 school year, Thethe Mastery Based Competency-Based Education Pilot Program is created within the Department of Education to be administered for a period of 5 years.
(1) PARTICIPATION.—The(1) PARTICIPATION.—Developmental P.K.research schools established under s.
Yonge1002.32, Developmentalincluding Research School and public school districts, including, but not limited to, the Lake,P.K. Palm Beach, Pinellas, and Seminole County School Districts, may submit an application in a format prescribed by the department to participate in the pilot program.
Yonge Developmental Research School, and public school districts, including, but not limited to, the Lake, Palm Beach, Pinellas, and Seminole County School Districts, may submit an application in a format prescribed by the department to participate in the pilot program.
(4) ALTERNATIVE CREDIT AND LETTER GRADE SYSTEMS.— (a) Beginning with the 2019-2020 school year, participating school districts and developmental research schools may amend their applications to include alternatives for awarding credit, as authorized under s.
2. AlternativesA toparticipating the interpretation of middle school district and highdevelopmental research school lettermust gradesamend mayits substitutestudent theprogression applicableplan languagerequired fromby thes. school district’s rigorous scoring rubric.
(b) An1008.25 applicationto thatconform is amended pursuant to thisthe subsectionalternative mustawarding beof approvedcredits bypursuant theto districtthis schoolsection. board.
2. Alternatives to the interpretation of middle school and high school letter grades may substitute the applicable language from the school district’s rigorous scoring rubric;
however, participating school districts and developmental research schools must continue to use the 4-point scale established in s.
1003.437(1) for calculating a student’s grade point average.
(b) An application that is amended pursuant to this subsection must be approved by the district school board or developmental research school governing authority, as applicable.
Section 4. Subsection (7)(1) isof added to section 1007.23, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
1007.23 Statewide articulation agreement.— (7) The(1) The articulationState agreementBoard mustof ensureEducation fair and equitablethe accessBoard forof highGovernors schoolshall graduatesenter withinto mastery-based,a nontraditionalstatewide diplomasarticulation andagreement transcripts.which the State Board of Education shall adopt by rule.
The agreement must preserve Florida’s “2+2” system of articulation, facilitate the seamless articulation of student credit across and among Florida’s educational entities, and reinforce the provisions of this chapter by governing:
(a) Articulation between secondary and postsecondary education, including fair and equitable access for students who have earned high school credit through a mastery-based education program pursuant to s.
1003.4996 and graduate with a standard high school diploma;
(b) Admission of associate in arts degree graduates from Florida College System institutions and state universities;
(c) Admission of applied technology diploma program graduates from Florida College System institutions or career centers;
(d) Admission of associate in science degree and associate in applied science degree graduates from Florida College System institutions;
(e) The use of acceleration mechanisms, including nationally standardized examinations through which students may earn credit;
(f) General education requirements and statewide course numbers as provided for in ss.
1007.24 and 1007.25;
and (g) Articulation among programs in nursing.
View plain text versions (2)
- S 226 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 226 Filed html
Action History
-
Died in Appropriations
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Now in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee Recommendation: CS/CS by Appropriations Subcommittee on Education; YEAS 7 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Subcommittee on Education, 04/04/19, 10:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
CS by Education read 1st time
-
Now in Appropriations Subcommittee on Education
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Education; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Education, 03/12/19, 1:30 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Education; Appropriations Subcommittee on Education; Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brandes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Brandes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Book | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Not Voting |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 226?
- SB 226 is sponsored by Brandes.
- What is the current status of SB 226?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 226?
- Track SB 226 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 226
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 226
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →