Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 355 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 355.
You're tracking HB 355
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 355 — Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/CS/SB 862 (Ch. 2019-104)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
73 added · 82 removed73 line(s) added, 82 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/CS/CS/HB 355 2019 A bill to be entitled An act relating to the dangerous instrumentality doctrine;
providing that the lessor of special mobile equipment for which a lessee maintains specified insurance is not aliable dangerousfor instrumentality;acts by lessee or lessee's agents or employees;
providing that a lessor may be liable for damages in specified circumstances;
(b) "Lessee" means a person who, pursuant to a lease agreement, acquires the right to possession and use of special Pagemobile 1equipment offrom 4a CODING:lessor pursuant to a lease agreement.
Page 1 of 3 CODING:
hb0355-02-c2hb0355-03-c3 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/CS/CS/HB 355 2019 mobileUnless equipmentthe fromcontext aclearly lessorindicates pursuantotherwise, tothe aterm leaseincludes agreement.a sublessee.
Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the term includes a sublessee.
The term also includes privately owned property where members of the public at large are welcomed as business invitees.
(d) Whether the instrumentality poses extraordinary Pagedangers 2not ofposed 4by CODING:instrumentalities not otherwise determined to be dangerous instrumentalities.
Page 2 of 3 CODING:
hb0355-02-c2hb0355-03-c3 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/CS/CS/HB 355 2019 dangers(e) notTo posedwhat byextent instrumentalitiesthe notLegislature otherwisehas determinedregulated tothe beinstrumentality. dangerous instrumentalities.
(e) To what extent the Legislature has regulated the instrumentality.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (2), the lessor of any special mobile equipment that causes injury, death, or damage while leased under a written lease agreement with documented proof of insurance coverage that contains limits of not less than $100,000 per person and up to $300,000 per incident for bodily injury liability and up to $50,000 for property damage liability or not less than $500,000 for combined property damage liability and bodily injury liability is not liable for acts of the lessee or the lessee's agent or employee in connection with the rental or lease, including any bodily injury, death, or damage resulting from the operation, maintenance, or use of the special mobile equipment.equipment by the lessee or the lessee's agent or employee.
The failure of the lessee to obtain or maintain insurance coverage required by the lease agreement does not impose liability on the lessor.
However,Section the2. lessor of special mobile equipment may be liable for damages that:
(a) Occurred while the lessor's employee or contractor was operating, maintaining, or using the equipment;
or (b) Resulted from the lessor's gross negligence or criminal wrongdoing.
Page 3 of 4 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0355-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 355 2019 Section 2.
Page 43 of 43 CODING:
hb0355-02-c2hb0355-03-c3
View plain text versions (4)
- H 355 c3 View text pdf
- H 355 c2 View text pdf
- H 355 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 355 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/CS/SB 862 (Ch. 2019-104)
-
Temporarily postponed, on 2nd Reading
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/17/19
-
Placed on Calendar
-
CS/CS/CS by Judiciary Committee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS -under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS/CS/CS by- Judiciary Committee; YEAS 12 NAYS 4
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary Committee, 03/21/19, 8:30 am, Sumner Hall
-
Now in Judiciary Committee
-
CS/CS by Insurance and Banking Subcommittee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS/CS by Insurance and Banking Subcommittee; YEAS 11 NAYS 2
-
CS by Civil Justice Subcommittee read 1st time
-
On Committee agenda-- Insurance and Banking Subcommittee, 03/13/19, 12:30 pm, Sumner Hall
-
Now in Insurance and Banking Subcommittee
-
Pending review of CS under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS by Civil Justice Subcommittee; YEAS 10 NAYS 5
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Civil Justice Subcommittee, 03/06/19, 8:00 am, Sumner Hall
-
Referred to Civil Justice Subcommittee; Insurance and Banking Subcommittee; Judiciary Committee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Leek · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Leek
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diamond | — | Nay |
| Geller | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Killebrew | — | Yea |
| Mercado | — | Not Voting |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Alexander | — | Yea |
| Beltran | — | Yea |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Yea |
| Fitzenhagen | — | Yea |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Nay |
| Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" | Democrat | Nay |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Yea |
| LaMarca, Chip | Republican | Yea |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diamond | — | Nay |
| Drake | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Not Voting |
| Stevenson | — | Yea |
| Aloupis | — | Yea |
| Altman | — | Yea |
| Caruso | — | Yea |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Valdes | — | Yea |
| Zika | — | Yea |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Nay |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Perez, Daniel | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diamond | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mercado | — | Nay |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Toledo | — | Yea |
| Bell | — | Yea |
| Beltran | — | Yea |
| Omphroy | — | Nay |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Nay |
| Antone, Bruce Hadley | Democrat | Nay |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 355?
- HB 355 is sponsored by Leek.
- What is the current status of HB 355?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 355?
- Track HB 355 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 355
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 355
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →