911 Services
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 536 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 536.
You're tracking SB 536
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 536 — 911 Services
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 441 (Ch. 2019-146)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
319 added · 303 removed319 line(s) added, 303 removed.
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for CS for SB 536 By the CommitteeCommittees on Innovation,Appropriations; Industry, and Technology;
and SenatorsInnovation, BrandesIndustry, and PerryTechnology; 580-02955-19 2019536c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to 911 services;
and Senators Brandes, Perry, and Book 576-04621-19 2019536c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to 911 services;
requiring counties to develop a plan for implementing a text-to-911 system and to implement a system to receive E911 text messages by a specified date;
requiring that the Technology Program within the Department of Management Services develop and implement a plan to require that emergency dispatchers be able to transfer an emergency call from one E911 system to another E911 system in this state;
defining the terms “first responders”responder agency” and “911 public safety answering point”point”; or “PSAP”;
requiring aeach PSAPsheriff, toin becollaboration ablewith tocertain directlyfirst communicateresponder byagencies, radioto withenter firstinto responders;specified written agreements;
requiring each sheriff,agreement into collaborationrequire witha firstPSAP respondersto inbe hisable or her county, to enterdirectly intocommunicate specifiedwith writtenfirst agreements;responder agencies;
requiring each PSAP to installbe localable firstto responderbroadcast radiocertain dispatchemergency channelscommunications inand itspublic emergencysafety communicationsinformation; center;
requiring a law enforcement agency headheads to authorize the installation of histheir or her agency’s primary dispatch channel or channels on certain other law enforcement agency’sagency mobile or portable radios, upon request;
providing an exception;
3127 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
3329 Section 1. Present1. Subsection subsection(3) (15) of section 365.172, Florida Statutes, is redesignatedamended as subsection (16), a new subsection (15) is added to that section, and subsection (3) of that section is amended, to read:
(15) TEXT-TO-911 SERVICE.—Each county shall develop a countywide implementation plan for text-to-911 services and, by January 1, 2022, have in place a system to receive E911 text messages from providers.
365.177 Transfer of E911 calls between systems.— (1) The office shall develop and implement a plan by JanuaryFebruary 1, 2020, to require that a 911 public safety telecommunicator, when deemed prudent and requested by a caller or when deemed necessary, be able to transfer an emergency call from one local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 system to another local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 system in this state.
(2) In developing and implementing this plan, the office shall:
Section 3. The3. (1) The Legislature finds that there is an important state interest is served in protecting the public safety by ensuring that 911 telecommunications are routed to the most appropriate 911 system in the most expeditious manner possiblepossible. in order to protect public safety.
Thus,A a proper and legitimate state purpose is servedachieved when local government 911 public safety telecommunicators are able to transfertransfer, and receive transfers ofof, emergency calls to and from other local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 systems in this state.
Therefore,(2) The the Legislature also finds andthat declaresan important state interest is served in protecting the public safety by ensuring that thiseach act911 fulfillspublic ansafety importantanswering statepoint interest.is capable of direct radio communications with first responder agency dispatchers within the surrounding area for which the public safety answering point would not otherwise provide dispatch.
A proper and legitimate state purpose is achieved when a public safety answering point that receives an emergency communication is able to save crucial time by immediately conveying critical emergency information to first responder agency dispatchers to dispatch first responders.
(3) Therefore, the Legislature finds and declares that this act fulfills an important state interest.
(a) “First responders”responder agency” includes theeach law enforcement agencies,agency and fire service agencies,agency, other than a state agency, and each emergency managementmedical services providersprovider, that areis designated as a primary first respondersresponder for the service area in which a PSAP911 public safety answering point receives 911 calls.
(b) “911 public safety answering point” or “PSAP” means a municipal or county emergency communications or 911 call center in this state whichthat receives cellular, landline, or texttext-to-911 911 communications.
(2) A(2) Each PSAPsheriff, mustin becollaboration ablewith toall directlyfirst communicateresponder byagency radioheads within his or her county, shall facilitate the development and execution of written interlocal agreements between all primary first responders.responder agencies within the county.
TheEach PSAPagreement must beestablish ablewritten toprotocols makethat suchoutline communicationcircumstances withoutand havingpublic tosafety transferemergencies under which a 911PSAP callwill ordirectly havingprovide by radio notice of an emergency to relaythe informationon receivedduty duringdispatcher of a 911first callresponder toagency anotherfor which the PSAP ordoes emergencynot communicationsprovide centerprimary fordispatch dispatch.functions.
(3) InEach collaborationagreement withmust allrequire firstthe respondersPSAP into hishave ordirect herradio county,contact each sheriff shall enter into a written agreement with eachprimary first responder toagencies establishand protocolstheir underdispatchers, for which athe PSAP thatmay doesreasonably notreceive dispatch911 callscommunications, forwithout ahaving firstto respondertransfer agencya will911 directlycommunication notifyto theanother firstPSAP responderor agency’sdispatch on-dutycenter personnelfor ofdispatch. an emergency by radio.
The agreementmethod mustof requirecomplying the PSAP to be able to communicate with thethis personnelrequirement withoutshall havingbe toestablished transferby the 911first callresponder for dispatch to that agency orheads havingand toset relayforth thein informationeach receivedinterlocal duringagreement. a 911 call by telephone or other indirect means.
(4) Each(3) Each PSAP shallmust install,be incapable atof leastimmediately onebroadcasting dispatch911 consolecommunications withinor itspublic emergencysafety communicationsinformation center,over the primary radio dispatch channels of each first responder agency in the county it serves.serves where the PSAP may reasonably receive 911 calls in the first responder’s service area.
If therea arecounty multipleor PSAPsjurisdiction inhas amultiple county,PSAPs, each PSAP must have this capability.
(5) Upon(4) Unless thetechnologically precluded due to radio incompatibility, upon written request offrom a law enforcement agency head, anya other law enforcement agency head in the same county or in an adjoiningadjacent jurisdiction in another county shallmust authorize the requesting agency to install the otherresponding agency’s primary dispatch channel or channels in the requesting agency’s PSAP, dispatch center, or mobile or portable radios.
(6) By(5) Each Januaryprimary 1,first 2020,responder eachagency, countyPSAP, sheriffand shalldispatch certifycenter inwithin writingeach tocounty theshall Departmenttrain ofall Lawapplicable Enforcementpersonnel thatregarding allthe PSAPsprocedures inand hisprotocols orspecified herin countythe areinterlocal inagreements compliancemade withpursuant to this section.
This training shall also include radio functionality and how to readily access the necessary dispatch channels in accordance with the interlocal agreements.
(6) By January 1, 2020, each sheriff shall provide to the Department of Law Enforcement:
(a) A copy of each interlocal agreement made between the primary first responder agencies within his or her county pursuant to this section;
and (b) Written certification that all PSAPs in his or her county are in compliance with this section.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 536 c2 View text html
- S 536 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 536 Filed html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 441 (Ch. 2019-146)
-
Substituted CS/CS/HB 441
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/29/19
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
CS/CS by Appropriations read 1st time
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by- Appropriations; YEAS 17 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 04/18/19, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Appropriations
-
Favorable by Infrastructure and Security; YEAS 7 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Infrastructure and Security, 03/20/19, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS by Innovation, Industry, and Technology read 1st time
-
Now in Infrastructure and Security
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Innovation, Industry, and Technology; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Innovation, Industry, and Technology, 03/12/19, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Innovation, Industry, and Technology; Infrastructure and Security; Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brandes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Brandes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Book | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Not Voting |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Not Voting |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Not Voting |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bracy | — | Not Voting |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 536?
- SB 536 is sponsored by Brandes.
- What is the current status of SB 536?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 536?
- Track SB 536 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 536
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 536
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →