Florida 2019 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 536 — 911 Services

Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 441 (Ch. 2019-146)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

319 added · 303 removed

319 line(s) added, 303 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for SB 536 By the Committee on Innovation, Industry, and Technology;
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for CS for SB 536 By the Committees on Appropriations;
and Senators Brandes and Perry 580-02955-19 2019536c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to 911 services;
and Innovation, Industry, and Technology;
and Senators Brandes, Perry, and Book 576-04621-19 2019536c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to 911 services;
requiring counties to develop a plan for implementing a text-to-911 system and to implement a system to receive E911 text messages by a specified date;
requiring that the Technology Program within the Department of Management Services develop and implement a plan to require that emergency dispatchers be able to transfer an emergency call from one E911 system to another E911 system in this state;
requiring that the Technology Program within the Department of Management Services develop a plan to require that emergency dispatchers be able to transfer an emergency call from one E911 system to another E911 system in this state;
defining the terms “first responders” and “911 public safety answering point” or “PSAP”;
defining the terms “first responder agency” and “911 public safety answering point”;
requiring a PSAP to be able to directly communicate by radio with first responders;
requiring each sheriff, in collaboration with certain first responder agencies, to enter into specified written agreements;
requiring each sheriff, in collaboration with first responders in his or her county, to enter into specified written agreements;
requiring each agreement to require a PSAP to be able to directly communicate with first responder agencies;
requiring each PSAP to install local first responder radio dispatch channels in its emergency communications center;
requiring each PSAP to be able to broadcast certain emergency communications and public safety information;
requiring a law enforcement agency head to authorize the installation of his or her agency’s primary dispatch channel or channels on certain other law enforcement agency’s mobile or portable radios, upon request;
requiring law enforcement agency heads to authorize the installation of their agency’s dispatch channels on certain other law enforcement agency radios, upon request;
providing an exception;
31 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
27 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
33 Section 1. Present subsection (15) of section 365.172, Florida Statutes, is redesignated as subsection (16), a new subsection (15) is added to that section, and subsection (3) of that section is amended, to read:
29 Section 1. Subsection (3) of section 365.172, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
(15) TEXT-TO-911 SERVICE.—Each county shall develop a countywide implementation plan for text-to-911 services and, by January 1, 2022, have in place a system to receive E911 text messages from providers.
365.177 Transfer of E911 calls between systems.— (1) The office shall develop and implement a plan by January 1, 2020, to require that a 911 public safety telecommunicator, when deemed prudent and requested by a caller or when deemed necessary, be able to transfer an emergency call from one local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 system to another local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 system in this state.
365.177 Transfer of E911 calls between systems.— (1) The office shall develop a plan by February 1, 2020, to require that a 911 public safety telecommunicator, when deemed prudent and requested by a caller or when deemed necessary, be able to transfer an emergency call from one local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 system to another local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 system in this state.
(2) In developing and implementing this plan, the office shall:
(2) In developing this plan, the office shall:
Section 3. The Legislature finds that there is an important state interest in ensuring that 911 telecommunications are routed to the most appropriate 911 system in the most expeditious manner possible in order to protect public safety.
Section 3. (1) The Legislature finds that an important state interest is served in protecting the public safety by ensuring that 911 telecommunications are routed to the most appropriate 911 system in the most expeditious manner possible.
Thus, a proper and legitimate state purpose is served when local government 911 public safety telecommunicators are able to transfer and receive transfers of emergency calls from other local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 systems in this state.
A proper and legitimate state purpose is achieved when local government 911 public safety telecommunicators are able to transfer, and receive transfers of, emergency calls to and from other local, multijurisdictional, or regional E911 systems in this state.
Therefore, the Legislature finds and declares that this act fulfills an important state interest.
(2) The Legislature also finds that an important state interest is served in protecting the public safety by ensuring that each 911 public safety answering point is capable of direct radio communications with first responder agency dispatchers within the surrounding area for which the public safety answering point would not otherwise provide dispatch.
A proper and legitimate state purpose is achieved when a public safety answering point that receives an emergency communication is able to save crucial time by immediately conveying critical emergency information to first responder agency dispatchers to dispatch first responders.
(3) Therefore, the Legislature finds and declares that this act fulfills an important state interest.
(a) “First responders” includes the law enforcement agencies, fire service agencies, and emergency management services providers that are designated as first responders for the service area in which a PSAP receives 911 calls.
(a) “First responder agency” includes each law enforcement agency and fire service agency, other than a state agency, and each emergency medical services provider, that is designated as a primary first responder for the service area in which a 911 public safety answering point receives 911 calls.
(b) “911 public safety answering point” or “PSAP” means a municipal or county emergency communications call center in this state which receives cellular, landline, or text 911 communications.
(b) “911 public safety answering point” or “PSAP” means a municipal or county emergency communications or 911 call center in this state that receives cellular, landline, or text-to-911 communications.
(2) A PSAP must be able to directly communicate by radio with first responders.
(2) Each sheriff, in collaboration with all first responder agency heads in his or her county, shall facilitate the development and execution of written interlocal agreements between all primary first responder agencies within the county.
The PSAP must be able to make such communication without having to transfer a 911 call or having to relay information received during a 911 call to another PSAP or emergency communications center for dispatch.
Each agreement must establish written protocols that outline circumstances and public safety emergencies under which a PSAP will directly provide by radio notice of an emergency to the on duty dispatcher of a first responder agency for which the PSAP does not provide primary dispatch functions.
(3) In collaboration with all first responders in his or her county, each sheriff shall enter into a written agreement with each first responder to establish protocols under which a PSAP that does not dispatch calls for a first responder agency will directly notify the first responder agency’s on-duty personnel of an emergency by radio.
Each agreement must require the PSAP to have direct radio contact with primary first responder agencies and their dispatchers, for which the PSAP may reasonably receive 911 communications, without having to transfer a 911 communication to another PSAP or dispatch center for dispatch.
The agreement must require the PSAP to be able to communicate with the personnel without having to transfer the 911 call for dispatch to that agency or having to relay the information received during a 911 call by telephone or other indirect means.
The method of complying with this requirement shall be established by the first responder agency heads and set forth in each interlocal agreement.
(4) Each PSAP shall install, in at least one dispatch console within its emergency communications center, the primary radio dispatch channels of each first responder in the county it serves.
(3) Each PSAP must be capable of immediately broadcasting 911 communications or public safety information over the primary radio dispatch channels of each first responder agency in the county it serves where the PSAP may reasonably receive 911 calls in the first responder’s service area.
If there are multiple PSAPs in a county, each PSAP must have this capability.
If a county or jurisdiction has multiple PSAPs, each PSAP must have this capability.
(5) Upon the written request of a law enforcement agency head, any other law enforcement agency head in the same county or an adjoining jurisdiction in another county shall authorize the requesting agency to install the other agency’s primary dispatch channel or channels in the requesting agency’s mobile or portable radios.
(4) Unless technologically precluded due to radio incompatibility, upon written request from a law enforcement agency head, a law enforcement agency head in the same county or in an adjacent jurisdiction in another county must authorize the requesting agency to install the responding agency’s primary dispatch channel or channels in the requesting agency’s PSAP, dispatch center, or mobile or portable radios.
(6) By January 1, 2020, each county sheriff shall certify in writing to the Department of Law Enforcement that all PSAPs in his or her county are in compliance with this section.
(5) Each primary first responder agency, PSAP, and dispatch center within each county shall train all applicable personnel regarding the procedures and protocols specified in the interlocal agreements made pursuant to this section.
This training shall also include radio functionality and how to readily access the necessary dispatch channels in accordance with the interlocal agreements.
(6) By January 1, 2020, each sheriff shall provide to the Department of Law Enforcement:
(a) A copy of each interlocal agreement made between the primary first responder agencies within his or her county pursuant to this section;
and (b) Written certification that all PSAPs in his or her county are in compliance with this section.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 441 (Ch. 2019-146)

  2. Substituted CS/CS/HB 441

  3. Read 2nd time

  4. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/29/19

  5. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  6. CS/CS by Appropriations read 1st time

  7. Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  8. CS/CS by- Appropriations; YEAS 17 NAYS 0

  9. On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 04/18/19, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building

  10. Now in Appropriations

  11. Favorable by Infrastructure and Security; YEAS 7 NAYS 0

  12. On Committee agenda-- Infrastructure and Security, 03/20/19, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building

  13. CS by Innovation, Industry, and Technology read 1st time

  14. Now in Infrastructure and Security

  15. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  16. CS by Innovation, Industry, and Technology; YEAS 9 NAYS 0

  17. On Committee agenda-- Innovation, Industry, and Technology, 03/12/19, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Building

  18. Introduced

  19. Referred to Innovation, Industry, and Technology; Infrastructure and Security; Appropriations

  20. Filed

Sponsors

  • Brandes · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Brandes

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15002
Republican 1002
Democrat 1000
Total 17004
% of votes cast 81%0%0%19%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Book — Yea
Gainer — Not Voting
Hutson — Yea
Powell — Yea
Stewart — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Flores — Yea
Gibson — Yea
Lee — Yea
Montford — Yea
Stargel — Yea
Simpson — Yea
Simmons — Not Voting
Bean — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Brandes — Yea
Braynon — Yea
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Not Voting
Mayfield, Debbie Republican Not Voting
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Favorable

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6001
Republican 1000
Total 7001
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Cruz — Yea
Hutson — Yea
Stewart — Yea
Taddeo — Yea
Bean — Yea
Perry — Yea
Lee — Not Voting
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 536?
SB 536 is sponsored by Brandes.
What is the current status of SB 536?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 536?
Track SB 536 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 536

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 536

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →