Florida 2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 560 — Public Meetings and Records/Imminent Litigation

Last action — Died on Calendar

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

102 added · 91 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the revised version of Bill SB 560, there are a few notable updates regarding private meetings about imminent litigation. The bill clarifies that these meetings can still be held in private, but now it requires the entity's attorney to publicly name the potential claimant or litigant during a public meeting. Additionally, a transcription of the private meeting will need to be made public if a certain condition occurs. This change is significant because it enhances transparency while still allowing entities to prepare for potential legal challenges.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2018 SB 560 By Senator Steube 23-00772-18 2018560__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to public meetings and records;
Florida Senate - 2018 CS for SB 560 By the Committee on Rules;
and Senator Steube 595-02462-18 2018560c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to public meetings and records;
expanding an exemption from public meetings requirements to allow specified entities to meet in private with an attorney to discuss imminent litigation if certain conditions are met;
expanding an exemption from public meetings requirements to allow specified entities to meet in private with attorneys and technical experts to discuss imminent litigation if certain conditions are met;
providing an exception;
17 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
18 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
19 Section 1. Subsection (8) of section 286.011, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
20 Section 1. Subsection (8) of section 286.011, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
criminal and civil penalties.— (8)(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity, is exempt from this section and s.
criminal and civil penalties.— (8)(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity or his or her designee, is exempt from this section and s.
I of the State Constitution for the limited purpose of meeting may meet in private with the entity’s attorney to discuss imminent or pending litigation to which the entity is or may in the foreseeable future be presently a party before a court or administrative agency, provided that the following conditions are met:
I of the State Constitution for the limited purpose of meeting may meet in private with the entity’s attorneys and technical experts attorney to discuss imminent or pending litigation to which the entity is or may in the foreseeable future be presently a party before a court or administrative agency, provided that the following conditions are met:
For imminent litigation, the entity’s attorney shall identify the name of the potential claimant or litigant.
For imminent litigation, the entity’s attorney shall identify the name of the potential claimant or litigant unless the identity of the potential claimant or litigant is confidential or exempt from s.
119.07(1) or s.
24(a), Art.
I of the State Constitution.
Section 2. The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity to expand the exemption from public meetings requirements currently applicable to meetings at which any board or commission of any state agency or authority, or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity meet in private with the entity’s attorneys to discuss pending litigation to which the entity is presently a party before a court or administrative agency to include such meetings related to certain imminent litigation.
Section 2. The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity to expand the exemption from public meetings requirements currently applicable to meetings at which any board or commission of any state agency or authority, or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity meet in private with the entity’s attorneys to discuss pending litigation to which the entity is presently a party before a court or administrative agency.
Expanding this exemption is necessary to allow a governmental entity to privately prepare for threatened litigation by obtaining legal advice, exploring and developing relevant facts, and considering an early settlement or discussing other possible resolutions in order to make better-informed decisions.
The exemption is expanded to include such meetings when the designee of the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity is present, when technical experts of the entity are present, and when such meetings are related to certain imminent litigation.
The Legislature also finds that expanding this public meetings exemption will help ensure that governmental entities receive fair treatment during the judicial and administrative processes.
In addition, the Legislature finds that it is a public necessity to exempt the transcript of such exempt meetings from public records requirements.
These public meetings and public records exemptions are necessary to allow a governmental entity to privately prepare for threatened litigation by obtaining legal advice, exploring and developing relevant facts, and considering an early settlement or discussing other possible resolutions in order to make better informed decisions.
The Legislature also finds that these public meetings and public records exemptions will help ensure that governmental entities receive fair treatment during the judicial and administrative processes.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Died on Calendar

  2. Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

  3. CS by Rules read 1st time

  4. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  5. Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  6. CS by- Rules; YEAS 10 NAYS 2

  7. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 01/25/18, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Office Building

  8. Now in Rules

  9. Favorable by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 6 NAYS 0

  10. Introduced

  11. On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 01/10/18, 9:00 am, 401 Senate Office Building

  12. Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability

  13. Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 9 NAYS 1

  14. On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 11/14/17, 2:00 pm, 110 Senate Office Building

  15. Referred to Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules

  16. Filed

Sponsors

  • Steube · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Steube

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 10 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Republican 0200
Total 10201
% of votes cast 77%15%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Brandes — Yea
Flores — Yea
Lee — Yea
Montford — Yea
Perry — Yea
Simpson — Yea
Braynon — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Galvano — Not Voting
Book — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Nay
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Favorable

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4001
Republican 1000
Democrat 1000
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Galvano — Yea
Stargel — Yea
Baxley — Yea
Rader — Not Voting
Stewart — Yea
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Yea
Mayfield, Debbie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Favorable

Passed 9 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Republican 2100
Total 9100
% of votes cast 90%10%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Flores — Yea
Gibson — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Steube — Yea
Bracy — Yea
Powell — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Nay
Garcia, Ileana Republican Yea
Mayfield, Debbie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 560?
SB 560 is sponsored by Steube.
What is the current status of SB 560?
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 560?
Track SB 560 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 560

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 560

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →