SB 560 — Public Meetings and Records/Imminent Litigation
Last action — Died on Calendar
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
102 added · 91 removedPlain-language change summary
In the revised version of Bill SB 560, there are a few notable updates regarding private meetings about imminent litigation. The bill clarifies that these meetings can still be held in private, but now it requires the entity's attorney to publicly name the potential claimant or litigant during a public meeting. Additionally, a transcription of the private meeting will need to be made public if a certain condition occurs. This change is significant because it enhances transparency while still allowing entities to prepare for potential legal challenges.
Florida Senate - 2018 CS for SB 560 By Senatorthe SteubeCommittee 23-00772-18on 2018560__Rules; A bill to be entitled An act relating to public meetings and records;
and Senator Steube 595-02462-18 2018560c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to public meetings and records;
expanding an exemption from public meetings requirements to allow specified entities to meet in private with anattorneys attorneyand technical experts to discuss imminent litigation if certain conditions are met;
providing an exception;
1718 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
1920 Section 1. Subsection (8) of section 286.011, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
criminal and civil penalties.— (8)(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity,entity or his or her designee, is exempt from this section and s.
I of the State Constitution for the limited purpose of meeting may meet in private with the entity’s attorneys and technical experts attorney to discuss imminent or pending litigation to which the entity is or may in the foreseeable future be presently a party before a court or administrative agency, provided that the following conditions are met:
For imminent litigation, the entity’s attorney shall identify the name of the potential claimant or litigant.litigant unless the identity of the potential claimant or litigant is confidential or exempt from s.
119.07(1) or s.
24(a), Art.
I of the State Constitution.
Section 2. The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity to expand the exemption from public meetings requirements currently applicable to meetings at which any board or commission of any state agency or authority, or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity meet in private with the entity’s attorneys to discuss pending litigation to which the entity is presently a party before a court or administrative agencyagency. to include such meetings related to certain imminent litigation.
ExpandingThe this exemption is necessaryexpanded to allowinclude asuch governmentalmeetings entitywhen tothe privatelydesignee prepareof forthe threatenedchief litigationadministrative byor obtainingexecutive legalofficer advice,of exploringthe andgovernmental developingentity relevantis facts,present, andwhen consideringtechnical anexperts earlyof settlementthe orentity discussingare otherpresent, possibleand resolutionswhen insuch ordermeetings are related to makecertain better-informedimminent decisions.litigation.
TheIn Legislatureaddition, alsothe Legislature finds that expandingit thisis a public meetingsnecessity exemptionto willexempt helpthe ensuretranscript thatof governmentalsuch entitiesexempt receivemeetings fairfrom treatmentpublic duringrecords therequirements. judicial and administrative processes.
These public meetings and public records exemptions are necessary to allow a governmental entity to privately prepare for threatened litigation by obtaining legal advice, exploring and developing relevant facts, and considering an early settlement or discussing other possible resolutions in order to make better informed decisions.
The Legislature also finds that these public meetings and public records exemptions will help ensure that governmental entities receive fair treatment during the judicial and administrative processes.
View plain text versions (2)
- S 560 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 560 Filed html
Action History
-
Died on Calendar
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
CS by Rules read 1st time
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by- Rules; YEAS 10 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 01/25/18, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Office Building
-
Now in Rules
-
Favorable by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 6 NAYS 0
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 01/10/18, 9:00 am, 401 Senate Office Building
-
Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability
-
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 9 NAYS 1
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 11/14/17, 2:00 pm, 110 Senate Office Building
-
Referred to Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Steube · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Steube
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 15% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Galvano | — | Not Voting |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Nay |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galvano | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Rader | — | Not Voting |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 10% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Steube | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Nay |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 560?
- SB 560 is sponsored by Steube.
- What is the current status of SB 560?
- This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 560?
- Track SB 560 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 560
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 560
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →