SB 46 — Relief of Ramiro Companioni, Jr., by the City of Tampa
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 6545 (Ch. 2018-193)
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
42 added · 144 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill SB 46 has made several significant changes regarding the settlement of a lawsuit involving Ramiro Companioni, Jr. The new version includes a shortened history of the incident and confirms a settlement agreement for $5 million, removing extensive details about the crash itself. This change simplifies the bill by focusing on the financial resolution and streamlines the legislative process, making it easier for lawmakers to approve necessary compensation for Mr. Companioni’s injuries while ensuring accountability and resolution in a timely manner.
Florida Senate - 2018 (NP)CS for SB 46 By Senator Galvano 21-00228A-18 201846__ A bill to be entitled An act for the reliefCommittee ofon RamiroJudiciary; Companioni, Jr., by the City of Tampa;
and Senator Galvano 590-02638-18 201846c1 A bill to be entitled An act for the relief of Ramiro Companioni, Jr., by the City of Tampa;
9 WHEREAS, at about noon on November 22, 1996, 34-year-old Ramiro Companioni, Jr., was seriously injured while operating his motorcycle inon the inside, eastbound lane of East Hillsborough Avenue nearin itsTampa, intersectionFlorida, withas Northa 50thresult Street,of anda WHEREAS,collision with a City of Tampa Water Department trucktruck, operatedand byWHEREAS, citya employeelawsuit Faustino Pierola, which was accompaniedfiled by two other similar vehicles owned by the city and operatedin by2004 citya employees,final pulledjudgment intowas theentered outside,in eastboundfavor lane from the south shoulder of Hillsborough Avenue and steered across three lanes of traffic into the path of Mr.
Companioni,Companioni in the amount of $17,928,800 against the City of Tampa, based on a jury verdict in the amount of $19,932,000, and WHEREAS, althoughafter appeals and all legal remedies were exhausted, claim bills have been filed annually since the 2014 Regular Session seeking the full amount of the final judgment, plus interest, for Mr.
CompanioniCompanioni, attemptedand toWHEREAS, avoid the collisionparties byhave layingagreed downto hisa motorcycle,compromised hesettlement andin his motorcycle struck the rearamount of the$5 city-ownedmillion, truck,NOW, violentlyTHEREFORE, ejecting24 himBe fromIt theEnacted motorcycleby onto the pavement,Legislature causingof him massive and catastrophic injuries, and WHEREAS, independent eyewitnesses interviewed at the sceneState told traffic accident investigators that they witnessed the city-owned truck pull away from the shoulder and steer across the lanes of trafficFlorida: into the lane in which Mr.
Companioni26 wasSection traveling,1. The andfacts WHEREAS,stated onein eyewitnessthe estimatedpreamble thatto Mr.this act are found and declared to be true.
CompanioniSection had2. The beenCity travelingof atTampa ais speedauthorized ofand 40directed milesto perappropriate hourfrom asfunds henot approachedotherwise theencumbered city-ownedand truck,to whichdraw wasa wellwarrant withinin the maximumsum speed limit of 45$5 milesmillion, perto hour,fund anda WHEREAS,special theneeds eyewitnesstrust statedcreated thatfor the driverexclusive use and benefit of theRamiro cityCompanioni, ownedJr., truck,as Mr.compensation for injuries and damages sustained as described in this act.
Pierola, was the cause of the accident, and WHEREAS, witnesses testified at trial that the three-truck caravan owned and operated by the city appeared to be a “wagon train,” and that Mr.
Companioni was “cut off” by the trucks and had “nowhere to go,” and WHEREAS, Mr.
Pierola admitted that he failed to observe any traffic to the rear of his truck despite an even roadway, clear visibility, and the absence of obstructions, proving that he was negligent by failing to properly look for rearward traffic, and WHEREAS, despite an obvious conflict of interest, the City of Tampa Police Department failed to request an independent law enforcement agency to conduct the official traffic accident investigation, and the department attributed fault to both Mr.
Pierola and Mr.
Companioni, ignoring the eyewitnesses’ testimony that Mr.
Companioni was not operating his vehicle in excess of the speed limit, and WHEREAS, city employees at the scene, including Mr.
Pierola, did not tell investigators that Mr.
Companioni was operating his vehicle in excess of the maximum speed limit, and WHEREAS, as a result of the collision, Mr.
Companioni was rendered unconscious and suffered massive catastrophic injuries resulting in a coma;
multiple internal lacerations of the midsection organs resulting in the loss of the large intestine and necessitating a colostomy and urethral catheter;
removal of the spleen;
multiple fractures of his right hip and four spinal vertebrae;
a severed right sciatic nerve resulting in loss of control of the right hip, leg, and foot;
laceration and partial severance of the urethra and testicles;
and multiple lacerations and abrasions from contact with the road surface, causing permanent scarring and disfigurement, and WHEREAS, Mr.
Companioni’s injuries include fusions of his hips and lower back, surgeries on his midsection to repair the abdomen, multiple bouts of sepsis and infection, reattachment of the urethra and testicles, severe concussion syndrome, and posttraumatic stress disorder, and WHEREAS, Mr.
Companioni’s medical expenses totaled more than $1.2 million, and WHEREAS, Mr.
Companioni, who was an executive chef at the time of the accident, and had earned more than $40,000 in income annually, and WHEREAS, according to the unrefuted testimony of a prominent Tampa restaurateur, Mr.
Companioni was a rising star in the local restaurant community and would have likely had his annual income rise to more than $80,000 annually had he not been injured, and WHEREAS, as a result of the accident, Mr.
Companioni has suffered a loss of earnings and his earning capacity has been devastated, and WHEREAS, although permanently disabled, Mr.
Companioni has persevered and attempted to support himself by operating a hot dog stand at Tampa Bay Buccaneers games and other crowd events, and WHEREAS, at the time of the accident, Mr.
Companioni was an active, physically fit man in the prime of his life and had served his country as a Third Class Naval Reservist in a special unit attached to a Marine Corps and Navy Seal assault landing craft unit, and WHEREAS, before the accident, Mr.
Companioni actively served his community as a volunteer and was a Mason, which included volunteering and donating his services for various charity events at the Shriners Hospital for Children in his role as a Shriner, volunteering at career days and counseling students interested in becoming chefs at four high schools in Tampa, volunteering at community hospitals as part of the Navy’s “Operation White Hat” program, and has continued volunteering at events at Christ the King Catholic Church through organizing the church’s food service for various charitable events, and WHEREAS, Mr.
Companioni has suffered catastrophic and life changing injuries, severe bodily injury, pain and suffering, mental anguish, disfigurement, incontinence which requires the use of a colostomy bag, and the loss of enjoyment of life, and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2004, a Hillsborough County jury found the City of Tampa, by and through its employee, Mr.
Pierola, to be negligent and 90 percent at fault for the accident and resulting injuries to Mr.
Companioni, and found Mr.
Companioni to be 10 percent comparatively negligent, and WHEREAS, the jury determined Mr.
Companioni’s damages to be in the amount of $17,928,800, and WHEREAS, final judgment was entered on April 5, 2004, in the amount of the jury verdict, plus interest at the statutory rate of 7 percent per annum, and WHEREAS, following multiple posttrial motions and appeals, which have denied Mr.
Companioni justice for more than 10 years, the Florida Supreme Court and the Second District Court of Appeal upheld the verdict and final judgment, and WHEREAS, the City of Tampa has paid $100,000, which is the sovereign immunity limit applicable to this case, leaving a remaining balance of $17,828,800, plus interest at the statutory rate of 7 percent per annum, for which Mr.
Companioni seeks satisfaction, and WHEREAS, Mr.
Companioni has waited more than 21 years for any compensation in excess of the $100,000 sovereign immunity cap and has lived a tragic life because of his disabilities and life-changing permanent injuries, which have been made more difficult without receiving adequate compensation, NOW, THEREFORE, 131 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
133 Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act are found and declared to be true.
Section 2. The City of Tampa is authorized and directed to appropriate from funds not otherwise encumbered and to draw a warrant in the sum of $17,828,800, plus interest at the statutory rate of 7 percent per annum, payable to Ramiro Companioni, Jr., as compensation for injuries and damages sustained.
Show all 42 changed lines (2 more)
Section 4. This4. Excluding actthe shallfederal takeportions effectof uponany becomingliens, aMedicaid law.or otherwise, which the claimant must pay, it is the intent of the Legislature that the lien interests relating to the treatment and care of Ramiro Companioni, Jr., are hereby waived or extinguished.
Section 5. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.
Show all 42 changed rows (2 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- S 46 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 46 Filed html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 6545 (Ch. 2018-193)
-
Substituted CS/HB 6545
-
Amendment(s) adopted (536242)
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/07/18
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 12 NAYS 1
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/22/18, 10:00 am, 110 Senate Office Building
-
Now in Rules
-
Favorable by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 5 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 02/13/18, 10:00 am, 401 Senate Office Building
-
Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability
-
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 10 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/30/18, 2:00 pm, 110 Senate Office Building
-
Now in Judiciary
-
Recommendation: Unfavorable by Special Master on Claim Bills
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Special Master on Claim Bills; Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Galvano · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Galvano
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Galvano | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Nay |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galvano | — | Yea |
| Rader | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Not Voting |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Steube | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 46?
- SB 46 is sponsored by Galvano.
- What is the current status of SB 46?
- This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 46?
- Track SB 46 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 46
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 46
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →