Florida 2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 962 — Telephone Solicitation

Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 1267 (Ch. 2018-70)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

60 added · 55 removed

60 line(s) added, 55 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2018 SB 962 By Senator Grimsley 26-00714A-18 2018962__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to telephone solicitation;
Florida Senate - 2018 CS for SB 962 By the Committee on Commerce and Tourism;
and Senator Grimsley 577-01937-18 2018962c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to telephone solicitation;
364.246, F.S.;
365.176, F.S.;
authorizing telecommunication providers, with authorization from a subscriber, to block certain calls from reaching the subscriber;
authorizing telecommunication providers to block certain calls;
authorizing telecommunication providers to rely solely upon caller identification service information to determine originating numbers for the purpose of blocking such calls;
prohibiting the blocking of certain calls;
authorizing telecommunication providers to rely upon caller identification service information to determine originating numbers for the purpose of blocking such calls;
12 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
11 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
14 Section 1. Section 364.246, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
13 Section 1. Section 365.176, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
364.246 Florida Call-Blocking Act.— (1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Call-Blocking Act.” (2) As used in this section, the term:
365.176 Florida Call-Blocking Act.— (1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Call-Blocking Act.” (2) As used in this section, the term:
(3) Consistent with authorization provided by federal law and rules of the Federal Communications Commission or its successors, providers operating in this state may, with authorization from a subscriber, block calls to the subscriber in the following manner:
(3) Consistent with authorization provided by federal law and rules of the Federal Communications Commission or its successors, providers operating in this state may block calls in the following manner:
(a) Providers may block calls from specific numbers identified by the subscriber based on the originating number shown in the subscriber’s caller identification service.
(a) Providers may block a voice call when the subscriber to which the originating number is assigned has requested that calls purporting to originate from that number be blocked because the number is used for inbound calls only.
Such calls may be blocked without regard as to whether the calls actually originate from that number.
and 3. A valid North American Numbering Plan number that is allocated to a provider by the North American Numbering Plan Administrator or pooling administrator, but that is not assigned to a subscriber.
and 3. A valid North American Numbering Plan number that is allocated to a provider by the North American Numbering Plan Administrator or pooling administrator, but is unused, so long as the provider blocking the calls is the allocatee of the number and confirms that the number is unused or has obtained verification from the allocatee that the number is unused at the time of the blocking.
52 Providers may not block a voice call pursuant to subparagraph 1.
or subparagraph 2.
if the call is an emergency call placed to 911.
60
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 1267 (Ch. 2018-70)

  2. Substituted CS/HB 1267

  3. Read 2nd time

  4. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/05/18

  5. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  6. Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 12 NAYS 0

  7. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 01/25/18, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Office Building

  8. Now in Rules

  9. CS by Commerce and Tourism read 1st time

  10. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  11. CS by Commerce and Tourism; YEAS 8 NAYS 0

  12. Introduced

  13. On Committee agenda-- Commerce and Tourism, 01/09/18, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Office Building

  14. Referred to Commerce and Tourism; Rules

  15. Filed

Sponsors

  • Grimsley · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Grimsley

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Favorable

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Brandes — Yea
Flores — Yea
Lee — Yea
Montford — Yea
Perry — Yea
Simpson — Yea
Braynon — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Galvano — Not Voting
Book — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 962?
SB 962 is sponsored by Grimsley.
What is the current status of SB 962?
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 962?
Track SB 962 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 962

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 962

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →