Florida 2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 98 — Health Insurer Authorization

Last action — Died in Messages

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

208 added · 1 removed

208 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
DOCUMENT UNAVAILABLE
CS for CS for SB 98 First Engrossed (ntc) 201898e1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to health insurer authorization;
amending s.
627.42392, F.S.;
redefining the term “health insurer”;
defining the term “urgent care situation”;
prohibiting prior authorization forms from requiring certain information;
authorizing the Financial Services Commission to adopt certain rules;
requiring health insurers and pharmacy benefits managers on behalf of health insurers to provide certain information relating to prior authorization by specified means;
prohibiting such insurers and pharmacy benefits managers from implementing or making changes to requirements or restrictions to obtain prior authorization except under certain circumstances;
providing applicability;
requiring such insurers and pharmacy benefits managers to authorize or deny prior authorization requests and provide certain notices within specified timeframes;
creating s.
627.42393, F.S.;
defining terms;
requiring health insurers to publish on their websites and provide to insureds in writing a procedure for insureds and health care providers to request protocol exceptions;
specifying requirements for such procedure;
requiring health insurers, within specified timeframes, to authorize or deny a protocol exception request or respond to appeals of their authorizations or denials;
requiring authorizations or denials to specify certain information;
requiring health insurers to grant protocol exception requests under certain circumstances;
authorizing health insurers to request documentation in support of a protocol exception request;
providing an effective date.
34 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
36 Section 1. Section 627.42392, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
627.42392 Prior authorization.— (1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Health insurer” means an authorized insurer offering an individual or group health insurance policy that provides major medical or similar comprehensive coverage health insurance as defined in s.
624.603, a managed care plan as defined in s.
409.962(10), or a health maintenance organization as defined in s.
641.19(12).
(b) “Urgent care situation” has the same meaning as in s.
627.42393.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective January 1, 2017, or six (6) months after the effective date of the rule adopting the prior authorization form, whichever is later, a health insurer, or a pharmacy benefits manager on behalf of the health insurer, which does not provide an electronic prior authorization process for use by its contracted providers, shall only use the prior authorization form that has been approved by the Financial Services Commission for granting a prior authorization for a medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug benefit.
Such form may not exceed two pages in length, excluding any instructions or guiding documentation, and must include all clinical documentation necessary for the health insurer to make a decision.
At a minimum, the form must include:
(1) sufficient patient information to identify the member, date of birth, full name, and Health Plan ID number;
(2) provider name, address and phone number;
(3) the medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug benefit being requested, including the medical reason therefor, and all services tried and failed;
(4) any laboratory documentation required;
and (5) an attestation that all information provided is true and accurate.
The form, whether in electronic or paper format, may not require information that is not necessary for the determination of medical necessity of, or coverage for, the requested medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug.
The commission may adopt rules prescribing such necessary information.
Show all 85 changed rows (45 more)
Previous
Latest
(3) The Financial Services Commission in consultation with the Agency for Health Care Administration shall adopt by rule guidelines for all prior authorization forms which ensure the general uniformity of such forms.
(4) Electronic prior authorization approvals do not preclude benefit verification or medical review by the insurer under either the medical or pharmacy benefits.
(5) A health insurer or a pharmacy benefits manager on behalf of the health insurer must provide the following information in writing or in an electronic format upon request, and on a publicly accessible Internet website:
(a) Detailed descriptions of requirements and restrictions to obtain prior authorization for coverage of a medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug in clear, easily understandable language.
Clinical criteria must be described in language easily understandable by a health care provider.
(b) Prior authorization forms.
(6) A health insurer or a pharmacy benefits manager on behalf of the health insurer may not implement any new requirements or restrictions or make changes to existing requirements or restrictions to obtain prior authorization unless:
(a) The changes have been available on a publicly accessible Internet website at least 60 days before the implementation of the changes.
(b) Policyholders and health care providers who are affected by the new requirements and restrictions or changes to the requirements and restrictions are provided with a written notice of the changes at least 60 days before the changes are implemented.
Such notice may be delivered electronically or by other means as agreed to by the insured or health care provider.
107 This subsection does not apply to expansion of health care services coverage.
(7) A health insurer or a pharmacy benefits manager on behalf of the health insurer must authorize or deny a prior authorization request and notify the patient and the patient’s treating health care provider of the decision within:
(a) Seventy-two hours of obtaining a completed prior authorization form for nonurgent care situations.
(b) Twenty-four hours of obtaining a completed prior authorization form for urgent care situations.
Section 2. Section 627.42393, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
627.42393 Fail-first protocols.— (1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Fail-first protocol” means a written protocol that specifies the order in which a certain medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug must be used to treat an insured’s condition.
(b) “Health insurer” has the same meaning as provided in s.
627.42392.
(c) “Preceding prescription drug or medical treatment” means a medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug that must be used pursuant to a health insurer’s fail-first protocol as a condition of coverage under a health insurance policy or a health maintenance contract to treat an insured’s condition.
(d) “Protocol exception” means a determination by a health insurer that a fail-first protocol is not medically appropriate or indicated for treatment of an insured’s condition and the health insurer authorizes the use of another medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug prescribed or recommended by the treating health care provider for the insured’s condition.
(e) “Urgent care situation” means an injury or condition of an insured which, if medical care and treatment are not provided earlier than the time generally considered by the medical profession to be reasonable for a nonurgent situation, in the opinion of the insured’s treating physician, physician assistant, or advanced registered nurse practitioner, would:
1. Seriously jeopardize the insured’s life, health, or ability to regain maximum function;
or 2. Subject the insured to severe pain that cannot be adequately managed.
(2) A health insurer must publish on its website and provide to an insured in writing a procedure for an insured and health care provider to request a protocol exception.
The procedure must include:
(a) A description of the manner in which an insured or health care provider may request a protocol exception.
(b) The manner and timeframe in which the health insurer is required to authorize or deny a protocol exception request or respond to an appeal of a health insurer’s authorization or denial of a request.
(c) The conditions under which the protocol exception request must be granted.
(3)(a) The health insurer must authorize or deny a protocol exception request or respond to an appeal of a health insurer’s authorization or denial of a request within:
1. Seventy-two hours of obtaining a completed prior authorization form for nonurgent care situations.
2. Twenty-four hours of obtaining a completed prior authorization form for urgent care situations.
(b) An authorization of the request must specify the approved medical procedure, course of treatment, or prescription drug benefits.
(c) A denial of the request must include a detailed, written explanation of the reason for the denial, the clinical rationale that supports the denial, and the procedure to appeal the health insurer’s determination.
(4) A health insurer must grant a protocol exception request if:
(a) A preceding prescription drug or medical treatment is contraindicated or will likely cause an adverse reaction or physical or mental harm to the insured;
(b) A preceding prescription drug is expected to be ineffective, based on the medical history of the insured and the clinical evidence of the characteristics of the preceding prescription drug or medical treatment;
(c) The insured has previously received a preceding prescription drug or medical treatment that is in the same pharmacologic class or has the same mechanism of action, and such drug or treatment lacked efficacy or effectiveness or adversely affected the insured;
(d) A preceding prescription drug or medical treatment is not in the best interest of the insured because the insured’s use of such drug or treatment is expected to:
1. Cause a significant barrier to the insured’s adherence to or compliance with the insured’s plan of care;
2. Worsen an insured’s medical condition that exists simultaneously but independently with the condition under treatment;
or 3. Decrease the insured’s ability to achieve or maintain his or her ability to perform daily activities;
or (e) A preceding prescription drug is an opioid, and the protocol exception request is for a nonopioid prescription drug or treatment with a likelihood of similar or better results.
(5) The health insurer may request a copy of relevant documentation from the insured’s medical record in support of a protocol exception request.
Section 3. This act shall take effect January 1, 2019.
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Died in Messages

  2. Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

  3. In Messages

  4. CS passed as amended; YEAS 37 NAYS 0

  5. Read 3rd time

  6. Placed on 3rd reading

  7. Ordered engrossed

  8. Amendment(s) adopted (450052)

  9. Read 2nd time

  10. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 01/24/18

  11. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  12. CS/CS by Rules read 1st time

  13. Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  14. CS/CS by- Rules; YEAS 11 NAYS 0

  15. CS by Judiciary read 1st time

  16. Introduced

  17. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 01/11/18, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Office Building

  18. Now in Rules

  19. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  20. CS by Judiciary; YEAS 10 NAYS 0

  21. On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 12/05/17, 2:00 pm, 110 Senate Office Building

  22. Now in Judiciary

  23. Favorable by Banking and Insurance; YEAS 10 NAYS 0

  24. On Committee agenda-- Banking and Insurance, 11/07/17, 10:00 am, 110 Senate Office Building

  25. Referred to Banking and Insurance; Judiciary; Rules

  26. Filed

Sponsors

  • Steube · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Steube

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30000
Republican 5000
Democrat 2001
Total 37001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Baxley — Yea
Simmons — Yea
Bean — Yea
Gibson — Yea
Simpson — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Grimsley — Yea
Stargel — Yea
Hukill — Yea
Steube — Yea
Lee — Yea
Brandes — Yea
Braynon — Yea
Montford — Yea
Perry — Yea
Negron — Yea
Flores — Yea
Rader — Yea
Galvano — Yea
Book — Yea
Bracy — Yea
Broxson — Yea
Farmer — Yea
Gainer — Yea
Hutson — Yea
Powell — Yea
Stewart — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Taddeo — Yea
Torres — Yea
Campbell, Daryl Democrat Not Voting
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Yea
Young, RaShon Democrat Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Garcia, Ileana Republican Yea
Mayfield, Debbie Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Brandes — Yea
Galvano — Yea
Lee — Yea
Montford — Yea
Perry — Yea
Simpson — Yea
Benacquisto — Yea
Flores — Not Voting
Braynon — Not Voting
Book — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Favorable

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1001
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Braynon — Yea
Grimsley — Yea
Steube — Yea
Flores — Yea
Bracy — Yea
Broxson — Yea
Gainer — Yea
Taddeo — Yea
Thurston — Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Garcia, Ileana Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 98?
SB 98 is sponsored by Steube.
What is the current status of SB 98?
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 98?
Track SB 98 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 98

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 98

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →