Impact Fees
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 697 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 697.
You're tracking HB 697
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 697 — Impact Fees
Last action — Died in Community Affairs
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
225 added · 237 removed225 line(s) added, 237 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 A bill to be entitled An act relating to impact fees;
prohibiting local governments from requiring certain conditions in development orders, except under certain conditions;
The Legislature further finds that impact fees are an outgrowth of Pagethe 1home rule power of 9a CODING:local government to provide certain services within its jurisdiction.
Due to the growth of impact fee collections and local governments' reliance on impact fees, Page 1 of 8 CODING:
hb0697-03-c3hb0697-04-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 theit homeis rulethe powerintent of the Legislature to ensure that, when a localcounty governmentor tomunicipality provideadopts certainan servicesimpact withinfee itsby jurisdiction.ordinance or a special district adopts an impact fee by resolution, the governing authority complies with this section.
Due to the growth of impact fee collections and local governments' reliance on impact fees, it is the intent of the Legislature to ensure that, when a county or municipality adopts an impact fee by ordinance or a special district adopts an impact fee by resolution, the governing authority complies with this section.
A county or municipality is not required to wait 90 days to decrease, suspend, or Pageeliminate 2an ofimpact 9fee. CODING:
(e) Collection of the impact fee may not be required to occur earlier than the issuance of the building permit for the Page 2 of 8 CODING:
hb0697-03-c3hb0697-04-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 eliminateproperty anthat impactis subject to the fee.
(e) Collection of the impact fee may not be required to occur earlier than the issuance of the building permit for the property that is subject to the fee.
218.39 and submitted to the Auditor General must include an affidavit signed by the Pagechief 3financial officer of 9the CODING:local governmental entity or district school board stating that the local governmental entity or district school board has complied with this section.
Page 3 of 8 CODING:
hb0697-03-c3hb0697-04-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 chief(5) financialIn officerany ofaction challenging an impact fee, the localgovernment governmentalhas entitythe orburden districtof schoolproving boardby statinga thatpreponderance of the localevidence governmentalthat entitythe imposition or districtamount schoolof boardthe hasfee compliedmeets withthe requirements of state legal precedent or this section.
(5) In any action challenging an impact fee, the government has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee meets the requirements of state legal precedent or this section.
Page1. 4 of 9 CODING:
Development or conservation of an area of at least 1,000 acres consistent with the long-term master plan.
The local government may approve detailed specific area plans of less than Page 4 of 8 CODING:
hb0697-03-c3hb0697-04-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 1.1,000 acres based on local circumstances if it is determined that the detailed specific area plan furthers the purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380.
Development or conservation of an area of at least 1,000 acres consistent with the long-term master plan.
The local government may approve detailed specific area plans of less than 1,000 acres based on local circumstances if it is determined that the detailed specific area plan furthers the purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380.
Page7. 5 of 9 CODING:
Detailed analysis and identification of specific measures to ensure the protection and, as appropriate, restoration and management of lands within the boundary of the Page 5 of 8 CODING:
hb0697-03-c3hb0697-04-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 7.detailed specific area plan identified for permanent preservation through recordation of conservation easements consistent with s.
Detailed analysis and identification of specific measures to ensure the protection and, as appropriate, restoration and management of lands within the boundary of the detailed specific area plan identified for permanent preservation through recordation of conservation easements consistent with s.
protecting wildlife Pageand 6natural ofareas; 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0697-03-c3 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697 2018 and natural areas;
and enhancing thePage prospects6 for the creation of jobs.8 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0697-04-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 the prospects for the creation of jobs.
InWithin adopting30 adays detailedafter specificreceiving areaan planapplication orfor relatedapproval developmentof order, a localdetailed governmentspecific mayarea notplan include or imposerelated as a condition of a development orderorder, any requirement that a developer contribute or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of public facilities or portions thereof unless the local government hasmust enactedreview athe localapplication ordinancefor whichcompleteness requiresand otherissue development not within a sectorletter planningindicating areaall torequired contributeinformation itsis proportionatesubmitted share of the funds, land, or publicspecifying facilitieswith necessaryparticularity to accommodate any impactsareas havingwhich aare rationaldeficient. nexus to the proposed development.
When allowed under this section, the obligation to fund or construct new facilities or add to the present system of public facilities must have an essential nexus and be roughly proportionate to the proposed development.
11.
Within 30 days after receiving an application for approval of a detailed specific area plan or related development order, a local government must review the application for completeness and issue a letter indicating all required Page 7 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0697-03-c3 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697 2018 information is submitted or specifying with particularity any areas which are deficient.
A detailed specific area plan adopted by local development order pursuant to this section may be based upon a planning period longer than the generally applicable planning period of the local comprehensive plan and shall specify the projected populationPage within7 theof specific8 planningCODING: area during the chosen planning period.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
A detailed specific area plan adopted pursuant to this section is not required to demonstrate need based upon projected population growth or on any other basis.
All lands identified in the long-term master plan for permanent preservation shall be subject to a recorded conservation easement consistent with s.
704.06 before or concurrent with the effective date of the final detailed specific area plan to be Page 8 of 9 CODING:
hb0697-03-c3hb0697-04-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/CS/HB 697CS/CS/CS/HB, Engrossed 1 2018 approvedpopulation within the specific planning area.area during the chosen planning period.
A detailed specific area plan adopted pursuant to this section is not required to demonstrate need based upon projected population growth or on any other basis.
All lands identified in the long-term master plan for permanent preservation shall be subject to a recorded conservation easement consistent with s.
704.06 before or concurrent with the effective date of the final detailed specific area plan to be approved within the planning area.
Page 98 of 98 CODING:
hb0697-03-c3hb0697-04-e1
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- H 697 e1 View text pdf
- H 697 c3 View text pdf
- H 697 c2 View text pdf
- H 697 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 697 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Died in Community Affairs
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Received
-
Referred to Community Affairs; Appropriations Subcommittee on Finance and Tax; Appropriations
-
In Messages
-
CS passed as amended; YEAS 108 NAYS 5
-
Amendment(s) adopted (271065)
-
Read 3rd time
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Amendment(s) failed (403787)
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 02/28/18
-
Placed on Calendar
-
CS/CS/CS by Government Accountability Committee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS -under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS/CS/CS by- Government Accountability Committee; YEAS 20 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Government Accountability Committee, 02/08/18, 9:00 am, Morris Hall
-
Now in Government Accountability Committee
-
CS/CS by Ways and Means Committee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS/CS by Ways and Means Committee; YEAS 15 NAYS 1
-
On Committee agenda-- Ways and Means Committee, 01/17/18, 4:00 pm, Morris Hall
-
Now in Ways and Means Committee
-
CS by Local, Federal and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS by Local, Federal and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee; YEAS 14 NAYS 0
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Local, Federal and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee, 01/10/18, 3:30 pm, 12 HOB
-
Referred to Local, Federal and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee; Ways and Means Committee; Government Accountability Committee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Monique Miller · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Miller, Monique Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 85 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 108 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 4% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (117)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Abruzzo | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Alexander | — | Yea |
| Grant, M. | — | Yea |
| Raschein | — | Yea |
| Caldwell | — | Yea |
| Slosberg | — | Yea |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Latvala | — | Yea |
| Cortes, B. | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Cortes, J. | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Diaz, M. | — | Yea |
| Moraitis | — | Yea |
| Watson, B. | — | Nay |
| Watson, C. | — | Yea |
| Nunez | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fitzenhagen | — | Yea |
| Altman | — | Not Voting |
| Grant, J. | — | Not Voting |
| Ahern | — | Yea |
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Asencio | — | Yea |
| Beshears | — | Yea |
| Bileca | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Corcoran | — | Yea |
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Cummings | — | Yea |
| Diamond | — | Yea |
| Donalds | — | Yea |
| Drake | — | Yea |
| DuBose | — | Yea |
| Duran | — | Yea |
| Eagle | — | Yea |
| Edwards-Walpole | — | Yea |
| Fant | — | Yea |
| Fine | — | Yea |
| Fischer | — | Yea |
| Geller | — | Nay |
| Good | — | Yea |
| Goodson | — | Yea |
| Hager | — | Yea |
| Hardemon | — | Yea |
| Harrison | — | Yea |
| Henry | — | Nay |
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Ingram | — | Yea |
| Jacobs | — | Nay |
| Jacquet | — | Yea |
| Jenne | — | Yea |
| Killebrew | — | Yea |
| Magar | — | Yea |
| Mariano | — | Yea |
| McGhee | — | Not Voting |
| Mercado | — | Yea |
| Metz | — | Yea |
| Moskowitz | — | Yea |
| Newton | — | Yea |
| Oliva | — | Yea |
| Olszewski | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Peters | — | Yea |
| Pigman | — | Yea |
| Ponder | — | Yea |
| Porter | — | Yea |
| Pritchett | — | Yea |
| Raburn | — | Yea |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| Richardson | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Russell | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Shaw | — | Yea |
| Silvers | — | Yea |
| Spano | — | Yea |
| Sprowls | — | Yea |
| Stafford | — | Yea |
| Stevenson | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Toledo | — | Yea |
| Trujillo | — | Yea |
| White | — | Yea |
| Willhite | — | Yea |
| Williamson | — | Yea |
| La Rosa | — | Yea |
| Antone, Bruce Hadley | Democrat | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Daniels, Kimberly | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Nay |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Yea |
| Miller, Monique | Republican | Yea |
| Perez, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Plasencia, Susan | Republican | Yea |
| Stark, Paula A. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (23)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Abruzzo | — | Yea |
| Watson, B. | — | Yea |
| Watson, C. | — | Yea |
| Caldwell | — | Yea |
| Latvala | — | Yea |
| Raschein | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Drake | — | Yea |
| Fant | — | Not Voting |
| Jacobs | — | Yea |
| Newton | — | Yea |
| Olszewski | — | Yea |
| Pigman | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Henry | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Willhite | — | Yea |
| Williamson | — | Not Voting |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 5% | 0% | 24% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Abruzzo | — | Not Voting |
| Caldwell | — | Yea |
| Grant, M. | — | Yea |
| Altman | — | Yea |
| Cortes, B. | — | Yea |
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Donalds | — | Yea |
| Geller | — | Nay |
| Jacquet | — | Not Voting |
| Jenne | — | Not Voting |
| Mercado | — | Yea |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| White | — | Not Voting |
| La Rosa | — | Not Voting |
| Antone, Bruce Hadley | Democrat | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Yea |
| Miller, Monique | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Abruzzo | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Fant | — | Yea |
| Olszewski | — | Yea |
| Ponder | — | Yea |
| Raburn | — | Yea |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Yea |
| Miller, Monique | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 697?
- HB 697 is sponsored by Miller, Monique (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 697?
- This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 697?
- Track HB 697 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 697
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 697
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →