Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: In Committee 3 D cosponsors

HB 6523 — AN ACT CONCERNING VIRTUAL NET METERING CREDITS FOR MANUFACTURERS IN DISTRESSED MUNICIPALITIES.

Last action — FILE NO. 269

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

73 added · 11 removed

73 line(s) added, 11 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
6523 January Session, 2021 LCO No.
269 January Session, 2021 House Bill No.
3854 Referred to Committee on ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY Introduced by:
6523 House of Representatives, April 6, 2021 The Committee on Energy and Technology reported through REP.
(ET) AN ACT CONCERNING VIRTUAL NET METERING CREDITS FOR MANUFACTURERS IN DISTRESSED MUNICIPALITIES.
ARCONTI of the 109th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING VIRTUAL NET METERING CREDITS FOR MANUFACTURERS IN DISTRESSED MUNICIPALITIES.
At least ten million dollars per year, of the thirty million dollars per year cap, shall be designated for LCO 3854 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-06523-R01-1 of 2 HB.docx Raised Bill No.
At least ten million dollars per HB6523 / File No.
6523 manufacturerslocated inadistressed municipality,asdefinedin section 32-9p, providedthat such manufacturers include, in its application to an electric distribution company, an anticipated plan for the utilization of any energy savings associated with the credits received under this section.
269 1 HB6523 File No.
269 year, of the thirty million dollars per year cap, shall be designated for manufacturerslocated inadistressed municipality,asdefinedin section 32-9p, providedthat such manufacturers include, in its application to an electric distribution company, an anticipated plan for the utilization of any energy savings associated with the credits received under this section.
Section 1 July 1, 2021 16-244u(e)(1) ET Joint Favorable LCO 3854 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-06523- 2 of 2 R01-HB.docx }
Section 1 July 1, 2021 16-244u(e)(1) ET Joint Favorable HB6523 / File No.
269 2 HB6523 File No.
269 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation There is no fiscal impact resulting from the bill, which increases the virtual net metering credit cap from $20 to $30 million and requires that $10 millionincreditsbeprovidedtomanufacturerslocatedindistressed municipalities.
The bill does not increase the portion under the cap that may be utilized by municipalities to achieve energy savings and therefore does not result in a savings to municipalities participating in the program.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None HB6523 / File No.
269 3 HB6523 File No.
269 OLR Bill Analysis HB 6523 AN ACT CONCERNING VIRTUAL NET METERING CREDITS FOR MANUFACTURERS IN DISTRESSED MUNICIPALITIES.
SUMMARY The state’s virtual net metering law generally allows a state, municipal, or agricultural “customer host” that owns or leases certain renewable energy resources (e.g., solar) to (1) generate virtual net metering billing credits when the host generates more power than it uses and (2) share the credits with the customer host’s designated “beneficial accounts” to reduce the beneficial accounts’ electric bills.
This bill increases the annual cap on virtual net metering credits from $20 million to $30 million, but it requires that at least $10 million in annual credits be designated for manufacturers in a distressed municipality (presumably, as beneficial accounts of a state or municipal customer host).
It also requires the manufacturers to include, in their application to an electric distribution company (EDC) (i.e., Eversource and United Illuminating), an anticipated plan for using any energy savings associated with the credits it receives.
(The bill does not specify any criteria that this plan must meet for approval.
In addition, it is unclear how a manufacturer would meet this requirement, as existing law requires a customer-host to give its EDC advance written notification about its designated beneficial accounts, but it does not require the beneficial account holders to apply for an EDC’s approval (CGS § 16-244u(d)).) By law, the Department of Economic Community Development commissioner must annually designate distressed municipalities based on a combination of economic, education, demographic, and housing criteria.
In 2020, she designated the following 25 municipalities as distressed:
Ansonia, Bridgeport, Bristol, Chaplin, Derby, East Hartford, HB6523 / File No.
269 4 HB6523 File No.
269 East Haven, Griswold, Hartford, Meriden, Montville, New Britain, New Haven, New London, Norwich, Preston, Putnam, Sprague, Stratford, Torrington, Voluntown, Waterbury, West Haven, Winchester, and Windham.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2021 COMMITTEE ACTION Energy and Technology Committee Joint Favorable Yea 26 Nay 0 (03/18/2021) HB6523 / File No.
269 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. FILE NO. 269

  2. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 223

  3. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  4. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  5. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/06/21

  6. FILED WITH LCO

  7. Joint Favorable

  8. PUBLIC HEARING 0304

  9. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Energy and Technology

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (184)

184 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 184 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 6523?
HB 6523 is sponsored by Kara Rochelle (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), and Lucy Dathan (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 6523?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 6523?
Track HB 6523 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 6523

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 6523

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →