SB 56 — Environmental Quality: CEQA: exemption: critical infrastructure projects.
Last action — From committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010, 8th Special Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The act exempts from its provisions, among other things, certain types of ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, and emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service. This bill would exempt from CEQA a critical infrastructure project, which would include, among other projects, projects funded under the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 or the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006. The bill would provide that this exemption applies retroactively. Because a permitting agency, which includes a local agency, would be required to determine the applicability of, and to give notice of, that exemption, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would require a permitting agency, as defined, to issue or deny a permit within 15 working days of receiving a permit application from the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) or a local agency for a permit for a critical infrastructure project. The permitting agency would be authorized to apply to the ad hoc critical infrastructure permit review panel (panel) , which would be created by the bill, for a time extension to consider the permit application. The bill would provide that a permit application is deemed to be approved if the permitting agency fails to act within 15 working days of receiving the permit application and fails to obtain a time extension from the panel. The bill would authorize Caltrans or the local agency to file an appeal to the panel if the permitting agency denies the permit application or if the issued permit imposes unreasonable conditions that would lead to a significant delay in a critical infrastructure project. The panel would be authorized, at a duly noticed public meeting, to review a permit or denial of a permit for which an appeal was filed and to take specified actions. By requiring a permitting agency to perform additional duties related to critical infrastructure projects, this bill would imposed a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides that, until January 1, 2010, in an environmental impact report, a negative declaration, a mitigated negative declaration, or other document required by CEQA for either transportation projects funded under the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, or projects funded under the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006, the failure to analyze adequately the effects of greenhouse gas emissions otherwise required to be reduced pursuant to regulations adopted under the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 does not create a cause of action for a violation of CEQA. This bill would repeal that provision, thereby making a conforming change. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/12/10 - Introduced Current pdf February 12, 2010
- SB56 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing February 24.
-
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS.
Sponsors
- Hollingsworth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hollingsworth
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 56 do?
- (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The act exempts from its provisions, among other things, certain types of ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, and emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service. This bill would exempt from CEQA a critical infrastructure project, which would include, among other projects, projects funded under the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 or the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006. The bill would provide that this exemption applies retroactively. Because a permitting agency, which includes a local agency, would be required to determine the applicability of, and to give notice of, that exemption, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would require a permitting agency, as defined, to issue or deny a permit within 15 working days of receiving a permit application from the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) or a local agency for a permit for a critical infrastructure project. The permitting agency would be authorized to apply to the ad hoc critical infrastructure permit review panel (panel) , which would be created by the bill, for a time extension to consider the permit application. The bill would provide that a permit application is deemed to be approved if the permitting agency fails to act within 15 working days of receiving the permit application and fails to obtain a time extension from the panel. The bill would authorize Caltrans or the local agency to file an appeal to the panel if the permitting agency denies the permit application or if the issued permit imposes unreasonable conditions that would lead to a significant delay in a critical infrastructure project. The panel would be authorized, at a duly noticed public meeting, to review a permit or denial of a permit for which an appeal was filed and to take specified actions. By requiring a permitting agency to perform additional duties related to critical infrastructure projects, this bill would imposed a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides that, until January 1, 2010, in an environmental impact report, a negative declaration, a mitigated negative declaration, or other document required by CEQA for either transportation projects funded under the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, or projects funded under the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006, the failure to analyze adequately the effects of greenhouse gas emissions otherwise required to be reduced pursuant to regulations adopted under the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 does not create a cause of action for a violation of CEQA. This bill would repeal that provision, thereby making a conforming change. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 56?
- SB 56 is sponsored by Hollingsworth.
- What is the current status of SB 56?
- This bill died with 2009-2010, 8th Special Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 56?
- Track SB 56 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 56
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 56
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →