California 2009-2010, 8th Special Session Status: To Executive

SB 32 — Taxation: federal conformity.

Last action — Vetoed by Governor.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010, 8th Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, various provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code, as enacted as of a specified date, are referenced in various sections of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Those laws provide that for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, the specified date of those referenced Internal Revenue Code sections is January 1, 2005, unless otherwise specifically provided. Existing law requires, for any introduced bill that proposes changes in any of those dates, that the Franchise Tax Board prepare a complete analysis of the bill that describes all changes to state law that will automatically occur by reference to federal law as of the changed date. It further requires the Franchise Tax Board to immediately update and supplement that analysis upon any amendment to the bill, and requires that analysis be made available to the public and be submitted to the Legislature for publication in the daily journal of each house of the Legislature. This bill would change the specified date of those referenced Internal Revenue Code sections to January 1, 2010, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, and thereby would make numerous substantive changes to both the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law with respect to those areas of preexisting conformity that are subject to changes under federal laws enacted after January 1, 2005, and that have not been, or are not being, excepted or modified. This bill would make certain other changes in federal income tax laws applicable, with specified exceptions and modifications, and make specified supplemental, technical, or clarifying changes for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law or the Corporation Tax Law, or both, with respect to, among other things, the tax treatment of qualifying income of publicly traded partnerships, certain disaster mitigation payments, depreciation of electric transmission property and natural gas gathering lines, nuclear decommissioning cost provisions, a small refiner exception to oil depletion deduction, recapture rules for amortizable Section 197 intangibles, amortization of expenses incurred in creating or acquiring music or music copyrights, treatment of certain self-created musical works and qualified retirement income, funding for self-employed defined benefit pension plans and for multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, withdrawals from retirement plans for individuals called to active duty, waiver of an early withdrawal penalty tax on certain distributions of pension plans for public safety employees, allowance of additional IRA payments in certain bankruptcy cases, inflation indexing of gross income limitations on certain retirement savings incentives, treatment of death benefits from corporate-owned life insurance, exemption of income from leveraged real estate held by church plans, gratuitous transfer for benefits of employees, exclusion from gross income of specified grants for renewable energy property, exclusion from gross income with respect to a specified tragic event, penalties for bad checks, penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability by a tax preparer, frivolous tax submissions, exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence by certain employees of the intelligence community, sale of property by judicial officers, excise tax on UBTI of charitable remainder trusts, certain listed and reportable transactions provisions, the taxation of certain settlement funds, the active business requirement, loans to qualified continuing care facilities, exception from suspension rules, and specified federal acts. This bill would also increase the age of children whose unearned income is taxed as if a parent's income, would require a penalty to be imposed for a claim or credit made for an excessive amount, would increase the penalty for willful failure to file specified returns, and would revise, in modified conformity with the federal income tax laws, various provisions applicable to tax-exempt organizations. This bill would also specify various dates on which specified provisions apply, make findings and declarations that certain provisions are declaratory of existing law, specify the intent and operation in the application of provisions conforming to various federal acts, repeal obsolete provisions, and declare that the retroactive application of specified provisions serves public purposes, as defined. Because this bill would require specific documents to be filed under the penalty of perjury, thus changing the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the crime of perjury. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on January 8, 2010. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 8, 2010, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor.

  2. Enrolled. To Governor at 2 p.m.

  3. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 15. Page 119.) To enrollment.

  4. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 29. Page 147.) To Senate.

  6. Read third time. Amended. (Page 137.) To third reading.

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. (Heard in committee on February 25.)

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.)

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. (Heard in committee on February 24.)

  12. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Re-referred to Com. on Rev. & Tax.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 77.) To Assembly.

  16. Read second time. To third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 56.)

  18. Set for hearing February 12.

  19. (February 11 amended version corrected February 22.)

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 51.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Set for hearing February 11.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on Rev. & Tax.

  24. Read first time.

  25. Introduced. To Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Wolk · Primary
  • Leno · Cosponsor
  • Hancock · Cosponsor
  • Charles Calderon · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Leno
  • Hancock
  • Charles Calderon

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 2 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Democratic 1202
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 2302
% of votes cast 29%43%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Skinner — Nay
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Nay
Limón, Monique Democratic Not Voting
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Nay
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5000
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Skinner — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 15 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201402
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 221503
% of votes cast 55%38%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Leno — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Alquist — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Runner — Nay
Correa — Nay
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Cox — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Nay
Aanestad — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 54 Yea · 32 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 483005
Democratic 5000
Republican 1200
Total 543205
% of votes cast 59%35%0%5%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Charles — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Cook — Nay
Coto — Yea
Bill — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Gaines — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Davis — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Audra — Nay
V. — Not Voting
Manuel — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Not Voting
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 14 Yea · 5 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13502
Democratic 1000
Total 14502
% of votes cast 67%24%0%10%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Davis — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Conway — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Coto — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Miller — Nay
Torlakson — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB32 Wolk

Passed 22 Yea · 14 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201204
Democratic 2100
Republican 0100
Total 221404
% of votes cast 55%35%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Yee — Not Voting
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Negrete — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Nay
Aanestad — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6104
Total 6104
% of votes cast 55%9%0%36%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
Denham — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 32 do?
Under the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, various provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code, as enacted as of a specified date, are referenced in various sections of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Those laws provide that for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, the specified date of those referenced Internal Revenue Code sections is January 1, 2005, unless otherwise specifically provided. Existing law requires, for any introduced bill that proposes changes in any of those dates, that the Franchise Tax Board prepare a complete analysis of the bill that describes all changes to state law that will automatically occur by reference to federal law as of the changed date. It further requires the Franchise Tax Board to immediately update and supplement that analysis upon any amendment to the bill, and requires that analysis be made available to the public and be submitted to the Legislature for publication in the daily journal of each house of the Legislature. This bill would change the specified date of those referenced Internal Revenue Code sections to January 1, 2010, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, and thereby would make numerous substantive changes to both the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law with respect to those areas of preexisting conformity that are subject to changes under federal laws enacted after January 1, 2005, and that have not been, or are not being, excepted or modified. This bill would make certain other changes in federal income tax laws applicable, with specified exceptions and modifications, and make specified supplemental, technical, or clarifying changes for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law or the Corporation Tax Law, or both, with respect to, among other things, the tax treatment of qualifying income of publicly traded partnerships, certain disaster mitigation payments, depreciation of electric transmission property and natural gas gathering lines, nuclear decommissioning cost provisions, a small refiner exception to oil depletion deduction, recapture rules for amortizable Section 197 intangibles, amortization of expenses incurred in creating or acquiring music or music copyrights, treatment of certain self-created musical works and qualified retirement income, funding for self-employed defined benefit pension plans and for multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, withdrawals from retirement plans for individuals called to active duty, waiver of an early withdrawal penalty tax on certain distributions of pension plans for public safety employees, allowance of additional IRA payments in certain bankruptcy cases, inflation indexing of gross income limitations on certain retirement savings incentives, treatment of death benefits from corporate-owned life insurance, exemption of income from leveraged real estate held by church plans, gratuitous transfer for benefits of employees, exclusion from gross income of specified grants for renewable energy property, exclusion from gross income with respect to a specified tragic event, penalties for bad checks, penalty for understatement of taxpayer's liability by a tax preparer, frivolous tax submissions, exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence by certain employees of the intelligence community, sale of property by judicial officers, excise tax on UBTI of charitable remainder trusts, certain listed and reportable transactions provisions, the taxation of certain settlement funds, the active business requirement, loans to qualified continuing care facilities, exception from suspension rules, and specified federal acts. This bill would also increase the age of children whose unearned income is taxed as if a parent's income, would require a penalty to be imposed for a claim or credit made for an excessive amount, would increase the penalty for willful failure to file specified returns, and would revise, in modified conformity with the federal income tax laws, various provisions applicable to tax-exempt organizations. This bill would also specify various dates on which specified provisions apply, make findings and declarations that certain provisions are declaratory of existing law, specify the intent and operation in the application of provisions conforming to various federal acts, repeal obsolete provisions, and declare that the retroactive application of specified provisions serves public purposes, as defined. Because this bill would require specific documents to be filed under the penalty of perjury, thus changing the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the crime of perjury. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on January 8, 2010. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 8, 2010, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Who sponsors SB 32?
SB 32 is sponsored by Wolk, Leno, Hancock, and Charles Calderon.
What is the current status of SB 32?
This bill died with 2009-2010, 8th Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 32?
Track SB 32 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 32

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 32

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →