AN ACT CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF THE FORMER SEASIDE SANATORIUM FACILITY.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 167 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 167.
You're tracking SB 167
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 167 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF THE FORMER SEASIDE SANATORIUM FACILITY.
Last action — MOVED TO FOOT OF CAL., SENATE
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
53 added · 14 removed53 line(s) added, 14 removed.
Senate General Assembly CommitteeFile Bill No.
167353 January Session, 2021 LCOSenate Bill No.
5639167 ReferredSenate, toApril 8, 2021 The Committee on COMMERCECommerce Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(CE)HARTLEY ANof ACTthe CONCERNING15th THEDist., DISPOSITIONChairperson OFof THEthe FORMERCommittee SEASIDEon SANATORIUMthe FACILITY.part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF THE FORMER SEASIDE SANATORIUM FACILITY.
(b) Any request for information issued pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall, at a minimum, require that responses to such request provide for the repair and preservation of any seawall on said property in order to allow for public access to not less than one hundred feet landward from the shoreline for the full length of the coastal frontage of said property, the improvement and maintenance of the current residentialfacilitySB167 operatedbythestatefor/ personswithintellectualandFile LCO 5639 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00167-R01 of 3 SB.docx Committee Bill No.
167353 developmental1 disabilities,SB167 andFile theNo. compliance with all requirements of the deed and covenants associated with said property, including, but not limited to, an easement for the town of Waterford to maintain and repair the municipal utility equipment located on the property and the requirement that any proceeds from the sale of the property be used to support the persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
353 residentialfacility operatedbythestatefor personswithintellectualand developmental disabilities, and the compliance with all requirements of the deed and covenants associated with said property, including, but not limited to, an easement for the town of Waterford to maintain and repair the municipal utility equipment located on the property and the requirement that any proceeds from the sale of the property be used to support the persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
LCOSB167 5639/ {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00162File of 3 R02-SB.docx } Committee Bill No.
167353 This2 actSB167 shallFile takeNo. effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section353 1This fromact passageshall Newtake sectioneffect CEas Jointfollows Favorableand {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00167-shall LCOamend 5639the R02-SB.docxfollowing }sections: 3 of 3
Section 1 from passage New section CE Joint Favorable SB167 / File No.
353 3 SB167 File No.
353 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Department of Energy and GF - Cost Approximately None Environmental Protection 100,000 Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) to consult with the Governor, the Departments of Economic and Community Development, Administrative Services, the Office of Policy and Management, and the Town of Waterford to develop and issue a request for information (ROI) for low-impact, residential uses for the former Seaside Sanatorium facility by September 1, 2021.
DEEP currently does not have staff with expertise on low-impact residential development and would need to contract with consultants to assist in the development, implementation, and oversight of the ROI.
It is estimated that the bill would result in costs of approximately $100,000 in FY 22 to contract with outside consultants for this purpose.
The Out Years There is no annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above occurs only in FY 22.
SB167 / File No.
353 4 SB167 File No.
353 OLR Bill Analysis SB 167 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DISPOSITION OF THE FORMER SEASIDE SANATORIUM FACILITY.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Special Acts.
COMMITTEE ACTION Commerce Committee Joint Favorable Yea 21 Nay 2 (03/22/2021) SB167 / File No.
353 5
Action History
-
MOVED TO FOOT OF CAL., SENATE
-
FILE NO. 353
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 219
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/07/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Commerce
-
DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE
-
Vote to Draft
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0216
-
Reserved for Subject Matter Public Hearing
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Commerce
Sponsors
- Catherine A. Osten · Primary
- Paul M. Formica · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Catherine A. Osten Democratic
- Formica, Paul M.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (185)
185 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 185 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 167?
- SB 167 is sponsored by Catherine A. Osten (Democratic) and Formica, Paul M..
- What is the current status of SB 167?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 167?
- Track SB 167 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 167
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 167
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →