California 2009-2010, 4th Special Session Status: Enacted

AB 6 — Medi-Cal.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 6, Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act that revises hospital reimbursement methodologies in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals. Under existing law, to the extent required to maximize available federal funds under the demonstration project and to the extent authorized by the Special Terms and Conditions for the demonstration project, the department may claim federal reimbursement for expenditures in a certain priority order, as specified. This bill would provide, notwithstanding the above-described provisions, in order to maximize federal claiming under the demonstration project, that the department shall have broad discretion to claim federal reimbursement consistent with all applicable federal claiming rules for certain expenditures in an order of priority determined by the department. This bill would authorize the department to claim for any and all additional demonstration project funding made available pursuant to any amendments to the demonstration project made on or after October 1, 2008, or pursuant to any federal laws that increase the amount of available funding, including, but not limited to, the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This bill would provide that any amounts received in the 2008–09, 2009–10, and 2010–11 fiscal years from the federal government pursuant to additional demonstration project funding, as specified in the above provisions, shall be deposited in the Federal Trust Fund and would authorize the Department of Finance to authorize expenditure of these funds, as specified. This bill would require the department to submit an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for a waiver or demonstration project that would implement specified objectives. The bill would require the waiver or demonstration project to include designated restructuring proposals for the organization and delivery of services under the Medi-Cal program. The bill would require the department to submit the waiver or demonstration project application to the CMS by a date that allows sufficient time for the waiver or demonstration project to be approved by no later than September 1, 2010, or the conclusion of any extension period granted in the demonstration project set forth in the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, whichever happens last. (2) This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency or successor entity or designated department to submit an implementation plan to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature for implementation of the federally approved waiver or demonstration project for purposes of improving health care for low-income Californians, as specified. This bill would provide that the department shall only implement the waiver or demonstration project upon submittal of an implementation plan to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature at least 60 days prior to any appropriation. This bill would require the agency or successor entity or designated department, prior to preparing the implementation plan, to convene a stakeholder committee to advise on preparation of the implementation plan, as specified. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on July 1, 2009. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on July 1, 2009, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 6, Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 2. Page 66.)

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended.

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 53.)

  8. (Ayes 24. Noes 12. Page 43.)

  9. Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.

  10. (Ayes 37. Noes 1. Page 43.)

  11. Joint Rule 10.5 suspended.

  12. Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading.

  13. Read second time. To third reading.

  14. Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on second reading file.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 2. Page 25.)

  17. Read second time. To third reading.

  18. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Without reference to committee.

  20. From printer.

  21. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Evans · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Evans

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 88 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 80201
Democratic 5000
Republican 3000
Total 88201
% of votes cast 97%2%0%1%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Bass — Yea
Bill — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Adams — Yea
Charles — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Gaines — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Duvall — Not Voting
Swanson — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Cogdill — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 55 Yea · 3 Nay · 33 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 512030
Democratic 4001
Republican 0102
Total 553033
% of votes cast 60%3%0%36%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Gilmore — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Coto — Yea
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Berryhill — Not Voting
Tom — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Charles — Not Voting
Emmerson — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Gaines — Not Voting
Conway — Not Voting
Fuller — Not Voting
Hagman — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Not Voting
Krekorian — Not Voting
Miller — Not Voting
Nestande — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Duvall — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Tran — Not Voting
Villines — Not Voting
Adams — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 6 do?
(1) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act that revises hospital reimbursement methodologies in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals. Under existing law, to the extent required to maximize available federal funds under the demonstration project and to the extent authorized by the Special Terms and Conditions for the demonstration project, the department may claim federal reimbursement for expenditures in a certain priority order, as specified. This bill would provide, notwithstanding the above-described provisions, in order to maximize federal claiming under the demonstration project, that the department shall have broad discretion to claim federal reimbursement consistent with all applicable federal claiming rules for certain expenditures in an order of priority determined by the department. This bill would authorize the department to claim for any and all additional demonstration project funding made available pursuant to any amendments to the demonstration project made on or after October 1, 2008, or pursuant to any federal laws that increase the amount of available funding, including, but not limited to, the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This bill would provide that any amounts received in the 2008–09, 2009–10, and 2010–11 fiscal years from the federal government pursuant to additional demonstration project funding, as specified in the above provisions, shall be deposited in the Federal Trust Fund and would authorize the Department of Finance to authorize expenditure of these funds, as specified. This bill would require the department to submit an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for a waiver or demonstration project that would implement specified objectives. The bill would require the waiver or demonstration project to include designated restructuring proposals for the organization and delivery of services under the Medi-Cal program. The bill would require the department to submit the waiver or demonstration project application to the CMS by a date that allows sufficient time for the waiver or demonstration project to be approved by no later than September 1, 2010, or the conclusion of any extension period granted in the demonstration project set forth in the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, whichever happens last. (2) This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency or successor entity or designated department to submit an implementation plan to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature for implementation of the federally approved waiver or demonstration project for purposes of improving health care for low-income Californians, as specified. This bill would provide that the department shall only implement the waiver or demonstration project upon submittal of an implementation plan to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature at least 60 days prior to any appropriation. This bill would require the agency or successor entity or designated department, prior to preparing the implementation plan, to convene a stakeholder committee to advise on preparation of the implementation plan, as specified. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on July 1, 2009. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on July 1, 2009, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 6?
AB 6 is sponsored by Evans.
What is the current status of AB 6?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 6?
Track AB 6 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 6

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 6

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →