State contracts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 21 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 21.
You're tracking AB 21
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 21 — State contracts.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 19, Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, with regard to certain state contracts, requires the awarding department to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder meeting or making a good faith effort to meet specified statewide participation goals for disabled veteran business enterprises. Existing law requires that, if a bidder cites an approved utilization plan in response to the disabled veteran business enterprise participation requirements of a solicitation that calls for specified business participation, and the solicitation specifies higher participation goals than the utilization plan, the bidder shall meet the goals in the solicitation or make a good faith effort to do so. This bill would instead require the awarding department to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder meeting specified business enterprise statewide participation goals. The bill would also, if a solicitation specifies higher participation goals than the bidder's utilization plan, require the bidder to meet the goals in the solicitation. Existing law requires that certain contracts awarded by the Director of Corrections or the Director of the Youth Authority have specified statewide participation goals for minority business enterprises, women business enterprises, and disabled veteran enterprises. Existing law requires the awarding department, in awarding these contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, to consider the responsiveness of a bidder to the goals and, if a bidder fails to demonstrate a good faith effort in attaining these goals, requires the awarding department to award the contract to the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder. This bill would delete the requirement that, if a bidder fails to demonstrate a good faith effort in attaining these goals, the awarding department must award the contract to the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder. This bill would require that the state agencies report to the Department of General Services on or before July 1, 2012, and that the department report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2013, on the impact of the above provisions upon outreach efforts and the actual award of contracts to bidders meeting the business enterprise goals. (2) Existing law, with specified exceptions, prohibits any person, firm, or subsidiary thereof who has been awarded a consulting services contract from submitting a bid for, or being awarded a contract for, the provision of services, procurement of goods or supplies, or any other related action that is required, suggested, or otherwise deemed appropriate in the end product of the consulting services contract. Existing law provides that this prohibition does not apply to incidental advice or suggestions made outside of the scope of a consulting services contract with regard to certain contracts for the acquisition of information technology goods and services, as specified. This bill would also exempt from this authorization a contract that is part of a single competitive procurement conducted in more than one stage for information technology goods or services, when the Director of the Department of General Services and the Chief Information Officer determine that there is no conflict of interest, as specified, and that it is in the best interest of the state to utilize this procurement method. The bill would require the department to annually post a report on its Internet Web site describing each determination, as specified, and to provide notice to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee within 30 days of the posting of the report. (3) Existing law requires the Department of General Services, for any contract for information technology goods or services meeting specified requirements, to provide that not less than 10% of the contract price is required to be withheld until final delivery and acceptance of the goods and services, and requires the department to conduct a risk evaluation, as specified. This bill would, until July 1, 2013, require the department, if it determines that lesser withholding levels are appropriate based on the evaluation of risk, to withhold no less than 5% of the contract price, if the contract price is $10,000,000 or more, or no less than 3% of the contract price, if the contract price is less than $10,000,000, until final delivery and acceptance of the goods or services. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on July 1, 2009. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on July 1, 2009, pursuant to the California Constitution. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/28/09 - Chaptered Current pdf July 28, 2009
- Enrolled 07/28/09 - Enrolled pdf July 28, 2009
- Amended 07/23/09 - Amended Senate pdf July 23, 2009
- Introduced 07/02/09 - Introduced pdf July 02, 2009
- AB21 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 19, Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 2. Page 71.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 58.)
-
(Ayes 24. Noes 12. Page 43.)
-
Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.
-
(Ayes 37. Noes 1. Page 43.)
-
Joint Rule 10.5 suspended.
-
Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on second reading file.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 2. Page 30.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Without reference to committee.
-
From printer.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Evans · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Evans
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 80 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 88 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 2% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 2 | 0 | 30 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 55 | 3 | 0 | 33 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 3% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Bill | — | Not Voting |
| Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Tran | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 21 do?
- (1) Existing law, with regard to certain state contracts, requires the awarding department to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder meeting or making a good faith effort to meet specified statewide participation goals for disabled veteran business enterprises. Existing law requires that, if a bidder cites an approved utilization plan in response to the disabled veteran business enterprise participation requirements of a solicitation that calls for specified business participation, and the solicitation specifies higher participation goals than the utilization plan, the bidder shall meet the goals in the solicitation or make a good faith effort to do so. This bill would instead require the awarding department to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder meeting specified business enterprise statewide participation goals. The bill would also, if a solicitation specifies higher participation goals than the bidder's utilization plan, require the bidder to meet the goals in the solicitation. Existing law requires that certain contracts awarded by the Director of Corrections or the Director of the Youth Authority have specified statewide participation goals for minority business enterprises, women business enterprises, and disabled veteran enterprises. Existing law requires the awarding department, in awarding these contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, to consider the responsiveness of a bidder to the goals and, if a bidder fails to demonstrate a good faith effort in attaining these goals, requires the awarding department to award the contract to the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder. This bill would delete the requirement that, if a bidder fails to demonstrate a good faith effort in attaining these goals, the awarding department must award the contract to the next lowest responsive and responsible bidder. This bill would require that the state agencies report to the Department of General Services on or before July 1, 2012, and that the department report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2013, on the impact of the above provisions upon outreach efforts and the actual award of contracts to bidders meeting the business enterprise goals. (2) Existing law, with specified exceptions, prohibits any person, firm, or subsidiary thereof who has been awarded a consulting services contract from submitting a bid for, or being awarded a contract for, the provision of services, procurement of goods or supplies, or any other related action that is required, suggested, or otherwise deemed appropriate in the end product of the consulting services contract. Existing law provides that this prohibition does not apply to incidental advice or suggestions made outside of the scope of a consulting services contract with regard to certain contracts for the acquisition of information technology goods and services, as specified. This bill would also exempt from this authorization a contract that is part of a single competitive procurement conducted in more than one stage for information technology goods or services, when the Director of the Department of General Services and the Chief Information Officer determine that there is no conflict of interest, as specified, and that it is in the best interest of the state to utilize this procurement method. The bill would require the department to annually post a report on its Internet Web site describing each determination, as specified, and to provide notice to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee within 30 days of the posting of the report. (3) Existing law requires the Department of General Services, for any contract for information technology goods or services meeting specified requirements, to provide that not less than 10% of the contract price is required to be withheld until final delivery and acceptance of the goods and services, and requires the department to conduct a risk evaluation, as specified. This bill would, until July 1, 2013, require the department, if it determines that lesser withholding levels are appropriate based on the evaluation of risk, to withhold no less than 5% of the contract price, if the contract price is $10,000,000 or more, or no less than 3% of the contract price, if the contract price is less than $10,000,000, until final delivery and acceptance of the goods or services. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on July 1, 2009. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on July 1, 2009, pursuant to the California Constitution. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 21?
- AB 21 is sponsored by Evans.
- What is the current status of AB 21?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 21?
- Track AB 21 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 21
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 21
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →