California 2009-2010, 4th Special Session Status: Enacted

AB 22 — State property: Orange County Fair: inventory: leases: sale and leaseback.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 20, Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides that the state is divided into agricultural districts within the boundaries of which district agricultural associations may be formed. Existing law provides that District 32 is the County of Orange. This bill would create District 32a, which would consist of all of that real property that is a portion of District 32 that is commonly known as the Orange County Fair located in the City of Costa Mesa, and would prescribe certain matters applicable to officers of District 32 and District 32a. The bill would, among other things, (A) authorize the Department of General Services to sell all or any portion of the real property that composes District 32a pursuant to a public bidding process, as provided; (B) prohibit District 32a from entering into any contract, lease, or other agreement affecting the use or operation of that real property for a period that exceeds 3 months; (C) require those contracts, leases, or agreements to contain a certain cancellation notice; (D) authorize the department to be reimbursed for reasonable costs or expenses; (E) authorize bonds involving District 32a property to be paid from the proceeds of any sale or lease of District 32a property; (F) require the Director of General Services to report specified information to the chairs of the fiscal committees of the Legislature 30 days prior to executing a transaction for the sale of the real property; (G) require the director to include a reservation to the state of mineral rights in the sale of the real property; (H) require the net sale proceeds to be deposited into the District 32a Disposition Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury; and (I) require the department to report annually to the Legislature on the status of the sale of the real property. This bill would require District 32a to be abolished and all funds in the District 32a Disposition Fund to be transferred to the General Fund upon sale of all property that composes District 32a. (2) Existing law requires the Department of General Services to offer for sale land that is declared excess or is declared surplus by the Legislature, and that is not needed by any state agency, to local agencies and private entities and individuals, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also authorizes the Director of General Services, with the consent of the state agency involved, to let for a period not to exceed 5 years, any real or personal property that belongs to the state, subject to specified conditions. Any money received in connection with these leases is required to be deposited in the Property Acquisition Law Money Account and be available to the Department of General Services upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would authorize the Department of General Services to lease specified real property without certain existing restrictions, if the Director of General Services determines that the real property is of no immediate need to the state but may have a potential future use. This bill would require the Department of General Services to annually report to the Legislature on certain leases entered into under the authority of these provisions. The bill would also specify procedures for the reimbursement of costs incurred pursuant to entering into a lease under these provisions and require the Department of Finance to deposit, into the General Fund, the net proceeds of a lease after the reimbursement of those costs. This bill would authorize the Department of General Services to enter into a sale or long-term lease of certain listed properties, including entering into an option to repurchase that property or building. The bill would authorize the Department of General Services to sell real property or buildings if the proceeds of the sale would be used to defense or otherwise retire lease revenue bonds only if the issuer and trustee for the bonds approves the sales transaction. The bill would require the Director of General Services to make an annual report, on or before June 30 of each year, to the fiscal committees of the Legislature regarding the prior year's sales and leases pursuant to these provisions and at least 30 days prior to entering into any sale or lease pursuant to these provisions. If the proceeds of the sale would be used to defease or retire the bonds, those proceeds would be appropriated to the Department of General Services for that purpose. The bill would specify procedures for the reimbursement of costs incurred pursuant to these provisions. The Department of Finance would be required to deposit, in the General Fund, the net proceeds of a sale or lease after the reimbursement of certain costs. (3) Existing law requires each agency, as defined, to furnish the Department of General Services with a record of each parcel of real property it possesses and to update its real property holdings, reflecting any changes, by July 1 of each year, including specified information regarding project uses during the next 3 years. This bill would define terms for purposes of this requirement and would require the update of the real property holdings to include additional information regarding specific programmatic uses, whether the property is fully utilized, partially utilized, or excess with regard to an existing or ongoing program of the agency, agreements relating to the use of the property, and projected future uses during the next 5 years, as identified pursuant to the 5-year infrastructure plan, the agency's master plan, or as specified. The bill would require the head of each agency to make a specified annual certification and would require the Department of General Services to maintain the certification notices on its Internet Web site. (4) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA generally requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA also provides some exemptions from its requirements for specified projects. This bill would exempt the sale, lease, or repurchase of the Orange County Fair or specified state real property or buildings subject to the bill that is made on an "as is" basis from designated provisions of CEQA. The bill would also exempt from those provisions of CEQA the execution of the purchase and sale agreement or the exchange agreement for this property or these buildings if the disposition is not made on an "as is" basis and the close of escrow is contingent on a specified requirement and compliance with CEQA. (5) This bill would state the Legislature's finding and declaration that specified provisions apply to every transaction undertaken pursuant to the authority of this act. (6) The bill would authorize the Director of Finance to provide a loan from the General Fund in the amount of not more than $10,000,000 to augment Item 1760-001-0002 of Section 2 of the Budget Act of 2009 and to adjust the amounts appropriated in Item 1760-001-0002 of Section 2 of the Budget Act of 2009, for the purposes of supporting the management of the state's real property assets to implement the bill, thereby making an appropriation. (7) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on July 1, 2009. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on July 1, 2009, pursuant to the California Constitution. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 20, Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 3. Page 73.)

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended.

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 59.)

  8. (Ayes 24. Noes 12. Page 43.)

  9. Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.

  10. (Ayes 37. Noes 1. Page 43.)

  11. Joint Rule 10.5 suspended.

  12. Read third time and amended.

  13. Read second time. To third reading.

  14. Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on second reading file.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 2. Page 30.)

  17. Read second time. To third reading.

  18. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Without reference to committee.

  20. From printer.

  21. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Evans · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Evans

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34003
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 38003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Yee — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Corbett — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Harman — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 88 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 80300
Democratic 5000
Republican 3000
Total 88300
% of votes cast 97%3%0%0%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bill — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Gaines — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Bass — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 55 Yea · 3 Nay · 33 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 512030
Democratic 4001
Republican 0102
Total 553033
% of votes cast 60%3%0%36%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Not Voting
Fuller — Not Voting
Garrick — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Audra — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Bill — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Tom — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Not Voting
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Not Voting
Hagman — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Gaines — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Duvall — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Krekorian — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Nestande — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Tran — Not Voting
Adams — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 22 do?
(1) Existing law provides that the state is divided into agricultural districts within the boundaries of which district agricultural associations may be formed. Existing law provides that District 32 is the County of Orange. This bill would create District 32a, which would consist of all of that real property that is a portion of District 32 that is commonly known as the Orange County Fair located in the City of Costa Mesa, and would prescribe certain matters applicable to officers of District 32 and District 32a. The bill would, among other things, (A) authorize the Department of General Services to sell all or any portion of the real property that composes District 32a pursuant to a public bidding process, as provided; (B) prohibit District 32a from entering into any contract, lease, or other agreement affecting the use or operation of that real property for a period that exceeds 3 months; (C) require those contracts, leases, or agreements to contain a certain cancellation notice; (D) authorize the department to be reimbursed for reasonable costs or expenses; (E) authorize bonds involving District 32a property to be paid from the proceeds of any sale or lease of District 32a property; (F) require the Director of General Services to report specified information to the chairs of the fiscal committees of the Legislature 30 days prior to executing a transaction for the sale of the real property; (G) require the director to include a reservation to the state of mineral rights in the sale of the real property; (H) require the net sale proceeds to be deposited into the District 32a Disposition Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury; and (I) require the department to report annually to the Legislature on the status of the sale of the real property. This bill would require District 32a to be abolished and all funds in the District 32a Disposition Fund to be transferred to the General Fund upon sale of all property that composes District 32a. (2) Existing law requires the Department of General Services to offer for sale land that is declared excess or is declared surplus by the Legislature, and that is not needed by any state agency, to local agencies and private entities and individuals, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also authorizes the Director of General Services, with the consent of the state agency involved, to let for a period not to exceed 5 years, any real or personal property that belongs to the state, subject to specified conditions. Any money received in connection with these leases is required to be deposited in the Property Acquisition Law Money Account and be available to the Department of General Services upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would authorize the Department of General Services to lease specified real property without certain existing restrictions, if the Director of General Services determines that the real property is of no immediate need to the state but may have a potential future use. This bill would require the Department of General Services to annually report to the Legislature on certain leases entered into under the authority of these provisions. The bill would also specify procedures for the reimbursement of costs incurred pursuant to entering into a lease under these provisions and require the Department of Finance to deposit, into the General Fund, the net proceeds of a lease after the reimbursement of those costs. This bill would authorize the Department of General Services to enter into a sale or long-term lease of certain listed properties, including entering into an option to repurchase that property or building. The bill would authorize the Department of General Services to sell real property or buildings if the proceeds of the sale would be used to defense or otherwise retire lease revenue bonds only if the issuer and trustee for the bonds approves the sales transaction. The bill would require the Director of General Services to make an annual report, on or before June 30 of each year, to the fiscal committees of the Legislature regarding the prior year's sales and leases pursuant to these provisions and at least 30 days prior to entering into any sale or lease pursuant to these provisions. If the proceeds of the sale would be used to defease or retire the bonds, those proceeds would be appropriated to the Department of General Services for that purpose. The bill would specify procedures for the reimbursement of costs incurred pursuant to these provisions. The Department of Finance would be required to deposit, in the General Fund, the net proceeds of a sale or lease after the reimbursement of certain costs. (3) Existing law requires each agency, as defined, to furnish the Department of General Services with a record of each parcel of real property it possesses and to update its real property holdings, reflecting any changes, by July 1 of each year, including specified information regarding project uses during the next 3 years. This bill would define terms for purposes of this requirement and would require the update of the real property holdings to include additional information regarding specific programmatic uses, whether the property is fully utilized, partially utilized, or excess with regard to an existing or ongoing program of the agency, agreements relating to the use of the property, and projected future uses during the next 5 years, as identified pursuant to the 5-year infrastructure plan, the agency's master plan, or as specified. The bill would require the head of each agency to make a specified annual certification and would require the Department of General Services to maintain the certification notices on its Internet Web site. (4) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA generally requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA also provides some exemptions from its requirements for specified projects. This bill would exempt the sale, lease, or repurchase of the Orange County Fair or specified state real property or buildings subject to the bill that is made on an "as is" basis from designated provisions of CEQA. The bill would also exempt from those provisions of CEQA the execution of the purchase and sale agreement or the exchange agreement for this property or these buildings if the disposition is not made on an "as is" basis and the close of escrow is contingent on a specified requirement and compliance with CEQA. (5) This bill would state the Legislature's finding and declaration that specified provisions apply to every transaction undertaken pursuant to the authority of this act. (6) The bill would authorize the Director of Finance to provide a loan from the General Fund in the amount of not more than $10,000,000 to augment Item 1760-001-0002 of Section 2 of the Budget Act of 2009 and to adjust the amounts appropriated in Item 1760-001-0002 of Section 2 of the Budget Act of 2009, for the purposes of supporting the management of the state's real property assets to implement the bill, thereby making an appropriation. (7) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on July 1, 2009. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on July 1, 2009, pursuant to the California Constitution. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 22?
AB 22 is sponsored by Evans.
What is the current status of AB 22?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 22?
Track AB 22 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 22

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 22

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →