California 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session Status: Introduced

SB 22 — Contracting for noninstructional services.

Last action — From committee without further action.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes school districts and community college districts to contract for personal services currently or customarily performed by classified employees to achieve cost savings when specified conditions are met. Existing law requires the overall cost savings to be clearly demonstrated and sets forth certain requirements relating to comparing costs. This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would instead authorize school districts and community college districts to contract for any noninstructional services of any type, if awarded pursuant to certain provisions of existing law governing public contracts, and if the governing board of the school district or community college determines that the contract will provide a benefit for the school district or community college district. The bill would prohibit the contract from being invalidated for specified circumstances relating to food service functions and positions. (2) Existing law requires contracts for management consulting services relating to food services not to exceed a term of one year, and that contract renewals be considered on a year-to-year basis. Existing law prohibits a contract for food service management consulting services to eliminate any food service classified personnel or position, result in any adverse effect upon any food service classified food service personnel or position, or result in the supervision of food service classified personnel. This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would define the term "food service management services" to include specified functions, and would authorize school districts and community college districts to enter into contracts for food service management services for a mutually agreed upon term, subject to specified conditions. The bill would prohibit a contract for food service management services from being invalidated for specified circumstances, including that it results in or causes the elimination of a food service classified personnel or position. (3) Existing law sets forth certain requirements relating to higher education employer-employee relations, including, but not limited to, the requirement to meet and confer in good faith regarding terms and conditions of employment. This bill would declare that these employer-employee relations provisions do not limit the authority of the University of California, the Hastings College of the Law, and the California State University to enter into contracts with 3rd parties for noninstructional services, as prescribed. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. Read first time.

  3. Introduced. To Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Benoit · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Benoit

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 22 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes school districts and community college districts to contract for personal services currently or customarily performed by classified employees to achieve cost savings when specified conditions are met. Existing law requires the overall cost savings to be clearly demonstrated and sets forth certain requirements relating to comparing costs. This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would instead authorize school districts and community college districts to contract for any noninstructional services of any type, if awarded pursuant to certain provisions of existing law governing public contracts, and if the governing board of the school district or community college determines that the contract will provide a benefit for the school district or community college district. The bill would prohibit the contract from being invalidated for specified circumstances relating to food service functions and positions. (2) Existing law requires contracts for management consulting services relating to food services not to exceed a term of one year, and that contract renewals be considered on a year-to-year basis. Existing law prohibits a contract for food service management consulting services to eliminate any food service classified personnel or position, result in any adverse effect upon any food service classified food service personnel or position, or result in the supervision of food service classified personnel. This bill would repeal those provisions. The bill would define the term "food service management services" to include specified functions, and would authorize school districts and community college districts to enter into contracts for food service management services for a mutually agreed upon term, subject to specified conditions. The bill would prohibit a contract for food service management services from being invalidated for specified circumstances, including that it results in or causes the elimination of a food service classified personnel or position. (3) Existing law sets forth certain requirements relating to higher education employer-employee relations, including, but not limited to, the requirement to meet and confer in good faith regarding terms and conditions of employment. This bill would declare that these employer-employee relations provisions do not limit the authority of the University of California, the Hastings College of the Law, and the California State University to enter into contracts with 3rd parties for noninstructional services, as prescribed. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Who sponsors SB 22?
SB 22 is sponsored by Benoit.
What is the current status of SB 22?
This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 22?
Track SB 22 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 22

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 22

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →