California 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 6 — Human services.

Last action — Died on Senate third reading file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires the State Department of Developmental Services to allocate funds to private nonprofit regional centers for the provision of community services and support for persons with developmental disabilities and their families and sets forth the duties of regional centers in that regard. Existing law requires that contracts between the department and regional centers specify certain coordinator-to-consumer ratios. Existing law also requires these contracts to require the regional center to have, or contract for, expertise in certain areas. This bill would provide that, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, certain coordinator-to-consumer ratio requirements shall not apply and that a regional center shall not be required to have or contract for certain areas of expertise. Existing law requires regional centers, by December 1 of each year, to provide a listing to the department of a complete salary schedule for all personnel classifications used by the regional center and information on all prior fiscal year expenditures, as specified. This bill, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, would suspend the salary schedule reporting requirements. The bill would also provide that regional centers shall not be required to report certain prior fiscal year operations expenditures in 2009. The bill would also require regional centers, in order to implement changes in the level of funding for regional center purchase of services, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, to reduce certain payments for services delivered on or after February 1, 2009, by 3%, except as specified. Existing federal law provides for allocation of federal funds through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant program to eligible states. Existing law provides for the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program under which, through a combination of state and county funds and federal funds received through the TANF program, each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families. Existing law establishes maximum aid grant amounts to be provided under the CalWORKs program, and provides, with certain exceptions, including the 2007–08 and 2008–09 fiscal years for an annual cost-of-living adjustment to be made in the maximum aid payments provided to needy families under the program. This bill would reduce the maximum aid payments in effect on September 1, 2007, by 4%, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. This bill would provide that no adjustment to the maximum aid payment would be made for the 2009–10 fiscal year. Existing law provides for the State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled (SSP) , which requires the State Department of Social Services to contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to make payments to SSP recipients to supplement Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments made available pursuant to the federal Social Security Act. Under existing law, benefit payments under the SSP are calculated by establishing the maximum level of nonexempt income and federal SSI and state SSP benefits for each category of eligible recipient. The state SSP payment is the amount, when added to the nonexempt income and SSI benefits available to the recipient, which would be required to provide the maximum benefit payment. Under existing law, this adjustment becomes effective on January 1 of each year, until the 2010 calendar year, and thereafter, when the adjustment takes effect on June 1. This bill would provide that, on May 1, 2009, the maximum aid payment levels in effect on January 1, 2009, would be reduced to the payment levels in effect on December 1, 2008, except as specified. The bill would provide for a further reduction of these benefits of 2.3 percent, commencing July 1, 2009, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. The bill would provide that no benefit adjustment would be made for the 2010 calendar year, and would require the adjustment to be made effective June 1 commencing with the 2011 calendar year and thereafter. Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law establishes the federal Medicaid program, which is administered by each state. California's version of this program is the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. Existing law provides for the payment of a supplementary benefit under the IHSS program to any eligible aged, blind, or disabled person who is receiving Medi-Cal personal care services and who would otherwise be deemed a categorically needy recipient under the IHSS program. This bill would limit this supplementary payment to individuals who received Medi-Cal personal care services before July 1, 2009, who continue to receive those services, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. Existing law provides that when any increase in provider wages or benefits is negotiated or agreed to by a public authority or nonprofit consortium, the county shall use county-only funds for the state and county share of any increase in the program, unless otherwise provided in the Budget Act or appropriated by statute. Existing law establishes a formula with regard to provider wages or benefits increases negotiated or agreed to by a public authority or nonprofit consortium, and specifies the percentages required to be paid by the state and counties, beginning with the 2000–01 fiscal year, with regard to the nonfederal share of any increases. This bill, notwithstanding the existing formula, would limit state participation to a total cost of wages up to $9.50 per hour and individual health benefits up to $0.60 per hour, commencing July 1, 2009, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. This bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to implement the changes made by this bill relating to the IHSS program through all-county letters or similar instructions from the director, pending the adoption of emergency regulations. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on Senate third reading file.

  2. Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 27.).

  3. Ordered returned to third reading.

  4. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 57.) (February 14).

  5. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  6. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 24.)

  7. Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on second reading file.

  10. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  11. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 0. Page 31.)

  12. Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on third reading file.

  13. Re-referred to Com. on RULES.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on RULES. Read second time and amended.

  15. Referred to Com. on RULES.

  16. From printer.

  17. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Evans · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Evans

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended.

Passed 24 Yea · 13 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211203
Democratic 3000
Republican 0100
Total 241303
% of votes cast 60%33%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Negrete — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Nay
Cogdill — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Ashburn — Not Voting
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 56 Yea · 0 Nay · 36 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 510033
Democratic 4001
Republican 1002
Total 560036
% of votes cast 61%0%0%39%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Coto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
Bill — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Tom — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Charles — Not Voting
Fuller — Not Voting
Garrick — Not Voting
Hagman — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Gaines — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
DeVore — Not Voting
Duvall — Not Voting
Knight — Not Voting
Anderson — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Mendoza — Not Voting
Miller — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Silva — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Not Voting
Adams — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 6 do?
Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires the State Department of Developmental Services to allocate funds to private nonprofit regional centers for the provision of community services and support for persons with developmental disabilities and their families and sets forth the duties of regional centers in that regard. Existing law requires that contracts between the department and regional centers specify certain coordinator-to-consumer ratios. Existing law also requires these contracts to require the regional center to have, or contract for, expertise in certain areas. This bill would provide that, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, certain coordinator-to-consumer ratio requirements shall not apply and that a regional center shall not be required to have or contract for certain areas of expertise. Existing law requires regional centers, by December 1 of each year, to provide a listing to the department of a complete salary schedule for all personnel classifications used by the regional center and information on all prior fiscal year expenditures, as specified. This bill, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, would suspend the salary schedule reporting requirements. The bill would also provide that regional centers shall not be required to report certain prior fiscal year operations expenditures in 2009. The bill would also require regional centers, in order to implement changes in the level of funding for regional center purchase of services, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, to reduce certain payments for services delivered on or after February 1, 2009, by 3%, except as specified. Existing federal law provides for allocation of federal funds through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant program to eligible states. Existing law provides for the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program under which, through a combination of state and county funds and federal funds received through the TANF program, each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families. Existing law establishes maximum aid grant amounts to be provided under the CalWORKs program, and provides, with certain exceptions, including the 2007–08 and 2008–09 fiscal years for an annual cost-of-living adjustment to be made in the maximum aid payments provided to needy families under the program. This bill would reduce the maximum aid payments in effect on September 1, 2007, by 4%, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. This bill would provide that no adjustment to the maximum aid payment would be made for the 2009–10 fiscal year. Existing law provides for the State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled (SSP) , which requires the State Department of Social Services to contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to make payments to SSP recipients to supplement Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments made available pursuant to the federal Social Security Act. Under existing law, benefit payments under the SSP are calculated by establishing the maximum level of nonexempt income and federal SSI and state SSP benefits for each category of eligible recipient. The state SSP payment is the amount, when added to the nonexempt income and SSI benefits available to the recipient, which would be required to provide the maximum benefit payment. Under existing law, this adjustment becomes effective on January 1 of each year, until the 2010 calendar year, and thereafter, when the adjustment takes effect on June 1. This bill would provide that, on May 1, 2009, the maximum aid payment levels in effect on January 1, 2009, would be reduced to the payment levels in effect on December 1, 2008, except as specified. The bill would provide for a further reduction of these benefits of 2.3 percent, commencing July 1, 2009, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. The bill would provide that no benefit adjustment would be made for the 2010 calendar year, and would require the adjustment to be made effective June 1 commencing with the 2011 calendar year and thereafter. Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law establishes the federal Medicaid program, which is administered by each state. California's version of this program is the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. Existing law provides for the payment of a supplementary benefit under the IHSS program to any eligible aged, blind, or disabled person who is receiving Medi-Cal personal care services and who would otherwise be deemed a categorically needy recipient under the IHSS program. This bill would limit this supplementary payment to individuals who received Medi-Cal personal care services before July 1, 2009, who continue to receive those services, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. Existing law provides that when any increase in provider wages or benefits is negotiated or agreed to by a public authority or nonprofit consortium, the county shall use county-only funds for the state and county share of any increase in the program, unless otherwise provided in the Budget Act or appropriated by statute. Existing law establishes a formula with regard to provider wages or benefits increases negotiated or agreed to by a public authority or nonprofit consortium, and specifies the percentages required to be paid by the state and counties, beginning with the 2000–01 fiscal year, with regard to the nonfederal share of any increases. This bill, notwithstanding the existing formula, would limit state participation to a total cost of wages up to $9.50 per hour and individual health benefits up to $0.60 per hour, commencing July 1, 2009, unless a specified notice is made by the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, in accordance with a designated section of the Government Code. This bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to implement the changes made by this bill relating to the IHSS program through all-county letters or similar instructions from the director, pending the adoption of emergency regulations. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 6?
AB 6 is sponsored by Evans.
What is the current status of AB 6?
This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 6?
Track AB 6 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 6

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 6

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →