California 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 5 — Health.

Last action — Died on file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Bronzan-McCorquodale Act, contains provisions governing the operation and financing of community mental health services for the mentally disordered in every county through locally administered and locally controlled community mental health programs. Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act, an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. The act may be amended only by a 23 vote of both houses of the Legislature and only so long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act. Provisions that clarify procedures and terms of the act may be added by majority vote. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, comprised of specified members, to oversee various programs and provisions of law relating to mental health. The bill would provide that the commission shall administer its operations under the act separate and apart from the State Department of Mental Health. Existing law requires each county mental health program to prepare and submit a 3 year plan to be updated at least annually and approved by the department after review and comment by the commission. Existing law requires the department to evaluate each proposed expenditure plan and determine, among other things, the extent to which each county has the capacity to serve the number of child, adults, and seniors proposed in the plan. This bill would require the department to approve, deny, or request information on a county expenditure plan or update no later than 60 days upon receipt. The bill would provide that the department shall only evaluate those programs in a county expenditure plan or update that have not previously been approved or that have previously identified problems that have been conveyed to the county. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income persons are provided with health care services. The Medi-Cal program is partially governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. This bill would provide, except as specified, and to the extent permitted by federal law, that certain optional Medi-Cal benefits, including, among others, certain adult dental services, acupuncture services, and audiology and speech therapy services, are excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that these provisions shall be implemented on the first day of the month following 90 days after this bill becomes effective. The bill would provide that, upon a prescribed notification from the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the above provisions shall become inoperative. Existing law requires the department to establish and maintain a plan, known as the County Administrative Cost Control Plan, for the purpose of effectively controlling costs related to the county administration of the determination of eligibility for benefits under the Medi-Cal program within the amounts annually appropriated for that administration. Under existing law, the Legislature finds and declares that linking appropriate funding for county Medi-Cal administrative operations, including annual cost-of-doing-business adjustments, with performance standards will give counties the incentive to meet the performance standards and enable them to continue to do the work they do on behalf of the state. Existing law provides that it is the intent of the Legislature to not appropriate funds for the cost-of-doing-business adjustment for the 2008–09 fiscal year. This bill would additionally provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to not appropriate funds for the cost-of-doing-business adjustment for the 2009–10 fiscal year. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, which revises hospital reimbursement methodologies under the Medi-Cal program in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals that provide care to Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured patients. This demonstration project provides for funding, in supplementation of Medi-Cal reimbursement, to various hospitals, including designated public hospitals, nondesignated public hospitals, and private hospitals, as defined in accordance with certain provisions relating to disproportionate share hospitals. This bill would require that certain payments made to designated public hospitals and to the South Los Angeles Medical Services Preservation Fund for services rendered on or after the first day of the month following 90 days after the effective date of the bill, be reduced by 10%, but that in no event shall the total amount of the reduction exceed $54,200,000. The bill would provide that, upon a prescribed notification from the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the above provisions shall become inoperative. Under existing law, the State Department of Developmental Services contracts with private nonprofit regional centers to provide services and supports to persons with developmental disabilities. This bill would require the department to submit a plan to the Legislature by April 1, 2009, as part of the Governor's Finance Letter process, that shall identify specific cost containment measures to achieve up to $100,000,000 in General Fund reductions for the 2009–10 fiscal year. The bill would provide that in the event that statutory changes are not enacted by September 1, 2009, to achieve a General Fund reduction of $100,000,000, as referenced above, the State Department of Developmental Services shall direct regional centers to reduce all payments for services and supports paid from purchase of services funds for services delivered on or after September 1, 2009, by 7.1%, except as specified. The bill would provide that the 7.1% shall, in subsequent fiscal years, be adjusted to ensure a General Fund reduction of $100,000,000 for that fiscal year. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on file.

  2. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  3. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 67. Noes 12. Page 85.) To Senate.

  4. (Corrected February 16.)

  5. Read third time. Amended. (Page 74.)

  6. Placed on third reading.

  7. Withdrawn from committee.

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RULES.

  9. To Com. on RULES.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  11. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 1. Page 18.) To Assembly.

  12. Read second time. To third reading.

  13. Placed on second reading file.

  14. Withdrawn from committee.

  15. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Ducheny · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ducheny

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 78 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 711201
Democratic 5000
Republican 2100
Total 781301
% of votes cast 85%14%0%1%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Nay
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bill — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Knight — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Gaines — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Audra — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Adams — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 30 Yea · 1 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27108
Democratic 3000
Republican 0001
Total 30109
% of votes cast 75%3%0%23%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Not Voting
Harman — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 5 do?
Existing law, the Bronzan-McCorquodale Act, contains provisions governing the operation and financing of community mental health services for the mentally disordered in every county through locally administered and locally controlled community mental health programs. Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act, an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. The act may be amended only by a 23 vote of both houses of the Legislature and only so long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act. Provisions that clarify procedures and terms of the act may be added by majority vote. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, comprised of specified members, to oversee various programs and provisions of law relating to mental health. The bill would provide that the commission shall administer its operations under the act separate and apart from the State Department of Mental Health. Existing law requires each county mental health program to prepare and submit a 3 year plan to be updated at least annually and approved by the department after review and comment by the commission. Existing law requires the department to evaluate each proposed expenditure plan and determine, among other things, the extent to which each county has the capacity to serve the number of child, adults, and seniors proposed in the plan. This bill would require the department to approve, deny, or request information on a county expenditure plan or update no later than 60 days upon receipt. The bill would provide that the department shall only evaluate those programs in a county expenditure plan or update that have not previously been approved or that have previously identified problems that have been conveyed to the county. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income persons are provided with health care services. The Medi-Cal program is partially governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. This bill would provide, except as specified, and to the extent permitted by federal law, that certain optional Medi-Cal benefits, including, among others, certain adult dental services, acupuncture services, and audiology and speech therapy services, are excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. This bill would provide that these provisions shall be implemented on the first day of the month following 90 days after this bill becomes effective. The bill would provide that, upon a prescribed notification from the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the above provisions shall become inoperative. Existing law requires the department to establish and maintain a plan, known as the County Administrative Cost Control Plan, for the purpose of effectively controlling costs related to the county administration of the determination of eligibility for benefits under the Medi-Cal program within the amounts annually appropriated for that administration. Under existing law, the Legislature finds and declares that linking appropriate funding for county Medi-Cal administrative operations, including annual cost-of-doing-business adjustments, with performance standards will give counties the incentive to meet the performance standards and enable them to continue to do the work they do on behalf of the state. Existing law provides that it is the intent of the Legislature to not appropriate funds for the cost-of-doing-business adjustment for the 2008–09 fiscal year. This bill would additionally provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to not appropriate funds for the cost-of-doing-business adjustment for the 2009–10 fiscal year. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, which revises hospital reimbursement methodologies under the Medi-Cal program in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals that provide care to Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured patients. This demonstration project provides for funding, in supplementation of Medi-Cal reimbursement, to various hospitals, including designated public hospitals, nondesignated public hospitals, and private hospitals, as defined in accordance with certain provisions relating to disproportionate share hospitals. This bill would require that certain payments made to designated public hospitals and to the South Los Angeles Medical Services Preservation Fund for services rendered on or after the first day of the month following 90 days after the effective date of the bill, be reduced by 10%, but that in no event shall the total amount of the reduction exceed $54,200,000. The bill would provide that, upon a prescribed notification from the Director of Finance to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the above provisions shall become inoperative. Under existing law, the State Department of Developmental Services contracts with private nonprofit regional centers to provide services and supports to persons with developmental disabilities. This bill would require the department to submit a plan to the Legislature by April 1, 2009, as part of the Governor's Finance Letter process, that shall identify specific cost containment measures to achieve up to $100,000,000 in General Fund reductions for the 2009–10 fiscal year. The bill would provide that in the event that statutory changes are not enacted by September 1, 2009, to achieve a General Fund reduction of $100,000,000, as referenced above, the State Department of Developmental Services shall direct regional centers to reduce all payments for services and supports paid from purchase of services funds for services delivered on or after September 1, 2009, by 7.1%, except as specified. The bill would provide that the 7.1% shall, in subsequent fiscal years, be adjusted to ensure a General Fund reduction of $100,000,000 for that fiscal year. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 5?
SB 5 is sponsored by Ducheny.
What is the current status of SB 5?
This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5?
Track SB 5 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →