California 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session Status: Enacted

AB 29 — Unemployment insurance.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 23, Statutes of 2009-10 Third Extraordinary Session.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 23, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Under existing law, unemployment compensation benefits are based on wages paid in a base period that is calculated according to the month within which the benefit year begins. This bill would, for new claims filed on or after a specified date, but no later than April 3, 2011, for which a valid claim or benefit year cannot be established under the currently defined base periods, establish alternative base periods, as provided. This bill would also require a claimant to submit specified information regarding wages to the Employment Development Department via an affidavit, under specified conditions. The bill would require the department to implement the technical changes necessary to establish claims under the alternate base period, as specified, as soon as possible, but no later than April 3, 2011. Because this measure would increase the amount of unemployment compensation paid, it would make an additional amount payable from the Unemployment Fund, a continuously appropriated special fund, and thereby would make an appropriation. Because this measure would require specified information to be submitted to the Employment Development Department on an affidavit, the submission of which, if false, is a misdemeanor under existing law, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The bill would require the department, until April 3, 2013, to report no less frequently than quarterly, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee on the progress and effectiveness of implementation of the alternative base period program prescribed under the bill. (3) Existing law requires the Employment Development Department, upon the filing of a new claim for benefits, to promptly make a computation on the claim that sets forth the maximum amount of benefits potentially payable during the benefit year and the weekly benefit amount, and to promptly notify the claimant and the claimant's base period employers of the computation, as specified. This bill would also require the department to promptly notify each of the claimant's base period employers of the computation on the claim based on a determination of eligibility, as specified. (4) Existing law requires the manner in which disputed claims, appeals, and petitions are presented, the reports required thereon by the claimant and from any employing unit, and the conduct of hearings and appeals, to be in accordance with rules prescribed by the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. This bill would require the appeals board to permit a party or representative to participate in a hearing by telephone, as specified, in accordance with regulations adopted by the board. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (6) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 23, Statutes of 2009-10 Third Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 60. Noes 6. Page 193.)

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 7. Page 126.)

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) .

  9. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (March 25).

  11. Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 181.)

  14. Read second time.

  15. Art. IV, Sec. 8(b) of the Constitution suspended. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 178.)

  16. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 23).

  17. Referred to Com. on INS.

  18. From printer.

  19. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Garrick · Cosponsor
  • Coto · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Coto

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Garrick

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 71 Yea · 6 Nay · 15 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 645015
Democratic 5000
Republican 2100
Total 716015
% of votes cast 77%7%0%16%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hagman — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Bill — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Gaines — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Conway — Nay
Duvall — Not Voting
Tom — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Salas — Not Voting
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Adams — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Not Voting
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 8 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8401
Total 8401
% of votes cast 62%31%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Runner — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 32 Yea · 7 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28701
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 32701
% of votes cast 80%18%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Florez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Runner — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Cox — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Not Voting
Benoit — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 90 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 82002
Democratic 5000
Republican 3000
Total 90002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Bill — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Gaines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Coto — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Garrick — Yea
Charles — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Carter — Yea
Coto — Yea
Nava — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Torres — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 29 do?
(1) Under existing law, unemployment compensation benefits are based on wages paid in a base period that is calculated according to the month within which the benefit year begins. This bill would, for new claims filed on or after a specified date, but no later than April 3, 2011, for which a valid claim or benefit year cannot be established under the currently defined base periods, establish alternative base periods, as provided. This bill would also require a claimant to submit specified information regarding wages to the Employment Development Department via an affidavit, under specified conditions. The bill would require the department to implement the technical changes necessary to establish claims under the alternate base period, as specified, as soon as possible, but no later than April 3, 2011. Because this measure would increase the amount of unemployment compensation paid, it would make an additional amount payable from the Unemployment Fund, a continuously appropriated special fund, and thereby would make an appropriation. Because this measure would require specified information to be submitted to the Employment Development Department on an affidavit, the submission of which, if false, is a misdemeanor under existing law, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The bill would require the department, until April 3, 2013, to report no less frequently than quarterly, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee on the progress and effectiveness of implementation of the alternative base period program prescribed under the bill. (3) Existing law requires the Employment Development Department, upon the filing of a new claim for benefits, to promptly make a computation on the claim that sets forth the maximum amount of benefits potentially payable during the benefit year and the weekly benefit amount, and to promptly notify the claimant and the claimant's base period employers of the computation, as specified. This bill would also require the department to promptly notify each of the claimant's base period employers of the computation on the claim based on a determination of eligibility, as specified. (4) Existing law requires the manner in which disputed claims, appeals, and petitions are presented, the reports required thereon by the claimant and from any employing unit, and the conduct of hearings and appeals, to be in accordance with rules prescribed by the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. This bill would require the appeals board to permit a party or representative to participate in a hearing by telephone, as specified, in accordance with regulations adopted by the board. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (6) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Who sponsors AB 29?
AB 29 is sponsored by Garrick and Coto.
What is the current status of AB 29?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 23, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 29?
Track AB 29 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 29

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 29

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →