AB 29 — Unemployment insurance.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 23, Statutes of 2009-10 Third Extraordinary Session.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 23, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, unemployment compensation benefits are based on wages paid in a base period that is calculated according to the month within which the benefit year begins. This bill would, for new claims filed on or after a specified date, but no later than April 3, 2011, for which a valid claim or benefit year cannot be established under the currently defined base periods, establish alternative base periods, as provided. This bill would also require a claimant to submit specified information regarding wages to the Employment Development Department via an affidavit, under specified conditions. The bill would require the department to implement the technical changes necessary to establish claims under the alternate base period, as specified, as soon as possible, but no later than April 3, 2011. Because this measure would increase the amount of unemployment compensation paid, it would make an additional amount payable from the Unemployment Fund, a continuously appropriated special fund, and thereby would make an appropriation. Because this measure would require specified information to be submitted to the Employment Development Department on an affidavit, the submission of which, if false, is a misdemeanor under existing law, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The bill would require the department, until April 3, 2013, to report no less frequently than quarterly, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee on the progress and effectiveness of implementation of the alternative base period program prescribed under the bill. (3) Existing law requires the Employment Development Department, upon the filing of a new claim for benefits, to promptly make a computation on the claim that sets forth the maximum amount of benefits potentially payable during the benefit year and the weekly benefit amount, and to promptly notify the claimant and the claimant's base period employers of the computation, as specified. This bill would also require the department to promptly notify each of the claimant's base period employers of the computation on the claim based on a determination of eligibility, as specified. (4) Existing law requires the manner in which disputed claims, appeals, and petitions are presented, the reports required thereon by the claimant and from any employing unit, and the conduct of hearings and appeals, to be in accordance with rules prescribed by the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. This bill would require the appeals board to permit a party or representative to participate in a hearing by telephone, as specified, in accordance with regulations adopted by the board. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (6) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 03/27/09 - Chaptered Current pdf March 27, 2009
- Enrolled 03/26/09 - Enrolled pdf March 26, 2009
- Amended 03/25/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 25, 2009
- Introduced 03/23/09 - Introduced pdf March 23, 2009
- AB29 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 23, Statutes of 2009-10 Third Extraordinary Session.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 60. Noes 6. Page 193.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 7. Page 126.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) .
-
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (March 25).
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 181.)
-
Read second time.
-
Art. IV, Sec. 8(b) of the Constitution suspended. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 178.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 23).
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
From printer.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Garrick · Cosponsor
- Coto · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Coto
Co-sponsors (1)
- Garrick
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 5 | 0 | 15 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 71 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 7% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 31% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 18% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 29 do?
- (1) Under existing law, unemployment compensation benefits are based on wages paid in a base period that is calculated according to the month within which the benefit year begins. This bill would, for new claims filed on or after a specified date, but no later than April 3, 2011, for which a valid claim or benefit year cannot be established under the currently defined base periods, establish alternative base periods, as provided. This bill would also require a claimant to submit specified information regarding wages to the Employment Development Department via an affidavit, under specified conditions. The bill would require the department to implement the technical changes necessary to establish claims under the alternate base period, as specified, as soon as possible, but no later than April 3, 2011. Because this measure would increase the amount of unemployment compensation paid, it would make an additional amount payable from the Unemployment Fund, a continuously appropriated special fund, and thereby would make an appropriation. Because this measure would require specified information to be submitted to the Employment Development Department on an affidavit, the submission of which, if false, is a misdemeanor under existing law, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The bill would require the department, until April 3, 2013, to report no less frequently than quarterly, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee on the progress and effectiveness of implementation of the alternative base period program prescribed under the bill. (3) Existing law requires the Employment Development Department, upon the filing of a new claim for benefits, to promptly make a computation on the claim that sets forth the maximum amount of benefits potentially payable during the benefit year and the weekly benefit amount, and to promptly notify the claimant and the claimant's base period employers of the computation, as specified. This bill would also require the department to promptly notify each of the claimant's base period employers of the computation on the claim based on a determination of eligibility, as specified. (4) Existing law requires the manner in which disputed claims, appeals, and petitions are presented, the reports required thereon by the claimant and from any employing unit, and the conduct of hearings and appeals, to be in accordance with rules prescribed by the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. This bill would require the appeals board to permit a party or representative to participate in a hearing by telephone, as specified, in accordance with regulations adopted by the board. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (6) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
- Who sponsors AB 29?
- AB 29 is sponsored by Garrick and Coto.
- What is the current status of AB 29?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 23, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 29?
- Track AB 29 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 29
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 29
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →