California 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 40 — Fuel user fee: vehicle fees.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law imposes a levy of $0.18 per gallon on motor vehicle fuel, commonly referred to as gasoline, and on diesel fuel, the revenues from which are deposited in the Motor Vehicle Fuel Account in the Transportation Tax Fund. Under Article XIX of the California Constitution, the portion of these revenues that is derived from use in motor vehicles upon public streets and highways is restricted for expenditure on streets and highways and for certain mass transit guideway purposes. The Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, provides procedures for the collection of certain fees and surcharges. This bill would, commencing on and after October 1, 2009, impose a user fee, as defined, of $0.18 cents per gallon of fuel, as defined, purchased by a user, as defined. The bill would also require a supplier or retailer to be licensed with the board, as specified. The bill would require a retailer to collect the user fee from each user, at the time the fuel is sold to the user, and would require the user fee to be precollected by a supplier, as specified. This bill would require revenues from the fee and related penalties to be deposited in the Motor Vehicle Fuel Account in the Transportation Tax Fund, which would be continued in existence as the Transportation Revenue Fund, and would limit the expenditure of the money deposited in the fund to specified purposes, consistent with the requirements under law for a user fee of this nature. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization to administer the user fees as specified, and would require the fee to be collected pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law. This bill would also impose other related provisions. This bill would also require certain certificates issued related to the fee to be signed under penalty of perjury, and would make certain acts related to exemption certificates a misdemeanor. Because this bill would expand the scope of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, and would create additional crimes, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law establishes as base fee amounts certain driver's license and identification card fees imposed by the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to specified provisions of the Vehicle Code. Existing law requires, on January 1 of every year, the department to adjust those base fee amounts by increasing each fee in an amount equal to the increase in the California Consumer Price Index for the prior year, as calculated by the Department of Finance, with amounts equal to or greater than $0.50 rounded to the next highest whole dollar. Existing law also provides that a statutory increase to the fees is deemed to be a change to the base fee. This bill would include within this scheme specified fee provisions applicable to restricted firefighter licenses and commercial driver's licenses and would increase, on and after October 1, 2009, or the effective date of this act, whichever is later, the amount of these and other fees subject to this scheme. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  3. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 31. Page 291.)

  4. (Ayes 47. Noes 28. Page 289.)

  5. Read third time and amended.

  6. Read second time. To third reading.

  7. Ordered to second reading.

  8. Without reference to committee.

  9. From printer.

  10. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Evans · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Evans

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 52 Yea · 36 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 473303
Democratic 4100
Republican 1200
Total 523603
% of votes cast 57%40%0%3%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Coto — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Bill — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Gaines — Nay
V. — Nay
Manuel — Nay
Perez — Nay
Audra — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Huber — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Silva — Nay
Villines — Not Voting
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 56 Yea · 31 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 502904
Democratic 5000
Republican 1200
Total 563104
% of votes cast 62%34%0%4%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
La — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Coto — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
DeVore — Nay
Bill — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Gaines — Nay
Audra — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Not Voting
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Not Voting
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 40 do?
(1) Existing law imposes a levy of $0.18 per gallon on motor vehicle fuel, commonly referred to as gasoline, and on diesel fuel, the revenues from which are deposited in the Motor Vehicle Fuel Account in the Transportation Tax Fund. Under Article XIX of the California Constitution, the portion of these revenues that is derived from use in motor vehicles upon public streets and highways is restricted for expenditure on streets and highways and for certain mass transit guideway purposes. The Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, provides procedures for the collection of certain fees and surcharges. This bill would, commencing on and after October 1, 2009, impose a user fee, as defined, of $0.18 cents per gallon of fuel, as defined, purchased by a user, as defined. The bill would also require a supplier or retailer to be licensed with the board, as specified. The bill would require a retailer to collect the user fee from each user, at the time the fuel is sold to the user, and would require the user fee to be precollected by a supplier, as specified. This bill would require revenues from the fee and related penalties to be deposited in the Motor Vehicle Fuel Account in the Transportation Tax Fund, which would be continued in existence as the Transportation Revenue Fund, and would limit the expenditure of the money deposited in the fund to specified purposes, consistent with the requirements under law for a user fee of this nature. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization to administer the user fees as specified, and would require the fee to be collected pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law. This bill would also impose other related provisions. This bill would also require certain certificates issued related to the fee to be signed under penalty of perjury, and would make certain acts related to exemption certificates a misdemeanor. Because this bill would expand the scope of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, and would create additional crimes, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law establishes as base fee amounts certain driver's license and identification card fees imposed by the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to specified provisions of the Vehicle Code. Existing law requires, on January 1 of every year, the department to adjust those base fee amounts by increasing each fee in an amount equal to the increase in the California Consumer Price Index for the prior year, as calculated by the Department of Finance, with amounts equal to or greater than $0.50 rounded to the next highest whole dollar. Existing law also provides that a statutory increase to the fees is deemed to be a change to the base fee. This bill would include within this scheme specified fee provisions applicable to restricted firefighter licenses and commercial driver's licenses and would increase, on and after October 1, 2009, or the effective date of this act, whichever is later, the amount of these and other fees subject to this scheme. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Who sponsors AB 40?
AB 40 is sponsored by Evans.
What is the current status of AB 40?
This bill died with 2009-2010, 3rd Special Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 40?
Track AB 40 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 40

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 40

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →