California 2009-2010, 1st Special Session Status: To Executive

SB 5 — Human services.

Last action — Vetoed by Governor.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires the State Department of Developmental Services to allocate funds to private nonprofit regional centers for the provision of community services and support for persons with developmental disabilities and their families and sets forth the duties of regional centers in that regard. Existing law requires that contracts between the department and regional centers specify certain coordinator-to-consumer ratios. Existing law also requires these contracts to require the regional center to have, or contract for, expertise in certain areas. This bill would provide that, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, certain coordinator-to-consumer ratio requirements shall not apply and that a regional center shall not be required to have or contract for certain areas of expertise. Existing law requires regional centers, by December 1 of each year, to provide a listing to the department of a complete salary schedule for all personnel classifications used by the regional center and information on all prior fiscal year expenditures, as specified. This bill, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, would suspend the salary schedule reporting requirements. The bill would also provide that regional centers shall not be required to report certain prior fiscal year operations expenditures in 2008 and 2009. The bill would also require regional centers, in order to implement changes in the level of funding for regional center purchase of services, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, to reduce certain payments for services delivered on or after December 1, 2008, by 3%, except as specified. Existing federal law provides for allocation of federal funds through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant program to eligible states. Existing law provides for the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program under which, through a combination of state and county funds and federal funds received through the TANF program, each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families. Existing law, with certain exceptions, requires an annual cost-of-living adjustment to be made in maximum aid payments provided to needy families under the CalWORKs program. This bill would provide that no adjustment to the maximum aid payment would be made for the 2009–10 fiscal year. Existing law provides for the State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled (SSP) , which requires the State Department of Social Services to contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to make payments to SSP recipients to supplement Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments made available pursuant to the federal Social Security Act. Under existing law, benefit payments under the SSP are calculated by establishing the maximum level of nonexempt income and federal SSI and state SSP benefits for each category of eligible recipient. The state SSP payment is the amount, when added to the nonexempt income and SSI benefits available to the recipient, which would be required to provide the maximum benefit payment. Under existing law, this adjustment becomes effective on January 1 of each year, until the 2010 calendar year, and thereafter, when the adjustment takes effect on June 1. This bill would provide that no benefit adjustment would be made for the 2010 calendar year, and would require the adjustment to be made effective June 1 commencing with the 2011 calendar year and thereafter. Existing law provides that, commencing with the 2004 calendar year and thereafter, in any calendar year in which no cost-of-living adjustment is made to the payment schedules, there shall be a pass along of any cost-of-living increases in federal SSI benefits. This bill would, for the 2009 calendar year, provide for the elimination of the federal pass along commencing April 1, 2009, except as specified. This bill would become operative if either AB 2 or SB 2 and AB 9 or SB 9 of the 2009–10 First Extraordinary Session of the Legislature are chaptered. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 1, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 1, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor.

  2. Enrolled. To Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  3. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 5. Page 31.) To enrollment.

  4. In Senate.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 48. Noes 23. Page 36.) To Senate.

  6. Amended. (Page 34.)

  7. Read second time.

  8. Held at desk.

  9. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 26.)

  10. Art. IV, Sec. 8(b), of Constitution dispensed with.

  11. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 10.) To Assembly.

  13. Read second time.

  14. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 8.)

  15. Art. IV, Sec. 8(b), of Constitution dispensed with.

  16. Withdrawn from committee.

  17. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Ducheny · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ducheny

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 55 Yea · 26 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4924011
Democratic 5000
Republican 1200
Total 5526011
% of votes cast 60%28%0%12%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hagman — Nay
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Eng — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
DeVore — Nay
Bill — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Gaines — Nay
Audra — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
V. — Not Voting
Manuel — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Duvall — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

W/O REF. TO FILE SB5 Ducheny

Passed 33 Yea · 6 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29601
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 33601
% of votes cast 83%15%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Yee — Nay
Ashburn — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Runner — Yea
Negrete — Nay
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

W/O REF. TO FILE SB5 Ducheny

Passed 34 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30105
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 34105
% of votes cast 85%3%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Walters — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 5 do?
Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires the State Department of Developmental Services to allocate funds to private nonprofit regional centers for the provision of community services and support for persons with developmental disabilities and their families and sets forth the duties of regional centers in that regard. Existing law requires that contracts between the department and regional centers specify certain coordinator-to-consumer ratios. Existing law also requires these contracts to require the regional center to have, or contract for, expertise in certain areas. This bill would provide that, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, certain coordinator-to-consumer ratio requirements shall not apply and that a regional center shall not be required to have or contract for certain areas of expertise. Existing law requires regional centers, by December 1 of each year, to provide a listing to the department of a complete salary schedule for all personnel classifications used by the regional center and information on all prior fiscal year expenditures, as specified. This bill, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, would suspend the salary schedule reporting requirements. The bill would also provide that regional centers shall not be required to report certain prior fiscal year operations expenditures in 2008 and 2009. The bill would also require regional centers, in order to implement changes in the level of funding for regional center purchase of services, from February 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, inclusive, to reduce certain payments for services delivered on or after December 1, 2008, by 3%, except as specified. Existing federal law provides for allocation of federal funds through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant program to eligible states. Existing law provides for the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program under which, through a combination of state and county funds and federal funds received through the TANF program, each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families. Existing law, with certain exceptions, requires an annual cost-of-living adjustment to be made in maximum aid payments provided to needy families under the CalWORKs program. This bill would provide that no adjustment to the maximum aid payment would be made for the 2009–10 fiscal year. Existing law provides for the State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled (SSP) , which requires the State Department of Social Services to contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to make payments to SSP recipients to supplement Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments made available pursuant to the federal Social Security Act. Under existing law, benefit payments under the SSP are calculated by establishing the maximum level of nonexempt income and federal SSI and state SSP benefits for each category of eligible recipient. The state SSP payment is the amount, when added to the nonexempt income and SSI benefits available to the recipient, which would be required to provide the maximum benefit payment. Under existing law, this adjustment becomes effective on January 1 of each year, until the 2010 calendar year, and thereafter, when the adjustment takes effect on June 1. This bill would provide that no benefit adjustment would be made for the 2010 calendar year, and would require the adjustment to be made effective June 1 commencing with the 2011 calendar year and thereafter. Existing law provides that, commencing with the 2004 calendar year and thereafter, in any calendar year in which no cost-of-living adjustment is made to the payment schedules, there shall be a pass along of any cost-of-living increases in federal SSI benefits. This bill would, for the 2009 calendar year, provide for the elimination of the federal pass along commencing April 1, 2009, except as specified. This bill would become operative if either AB 2 or SB 2 and AB 9 or SB 9 of the 2009–10 First Extraordinary Session of the Legislature are chaptered. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 1, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 1, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Who sponsors SB 5?
SB 5 is sponsored by Ducheny.
What is the current status of SB 5?
This bill died with 2009-2010, 1st Special Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5?
Track SB 5 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →