AN ACT CONCERNING REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 430 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 430.
You're tracking SB 430
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 430 — AN ACT CONCERNING REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS.
Last action — PUBLIC HEARING 0309
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
35 added · 13 removed35 line(s) added, 13 removed.
General Assembly ProposedCommittee Bill No.
23263334 Referred to Committee on COMMERCE Introduced by:
(CE) AN ACT CONCERNING REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
Section 1.
Subsection (b) of section 10-397 of the general statutes is repealed andthefollowing issubstituted inlieuthereof(EffectiveOctober 1, 2021):
(b) Each regional tourism district shall be overseen by a board of directorsconsisting ofonerepresentative fromeachmunicipality within the district, appointed by the legislative body of the municipality and, where the legislative body is a town meeting, by the board of selectmen, except that two or more municipalities may jointly appoint one representative, who shall be deemed to be present for each such municipality for the purposes of a quorum at any board of directors meeting that such representative attends and be permitted to vote for each such municipality at any such meeting.
Any such member of a board of directors shall serve for a term of three years.
In addition, the board of directors may appoint up to twenty-one persons representing tourism interests within the district to serve on the board.
No board member shall be deemed a state employee for serving on said board.
All LCO No.
3334 1 of 2 Committee Bill No.
430 appointments to the board of directors shall be reported to the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 October 1, 2021 10-397(b) Statement of Purpose:
To allow two or more municipalities in any regional tourism district to jointly appoint onerepresentativetotheregionaltourismdistrict boards of directors.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] Co-Sponsors:
OSTEN, 19th Dist.Dist.;
ANS.B. ACT CONCERNING REGIONAL TOURISM DISTRICTS.
Be430 itLCO enactedNo. by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
That3334 section2 10-397 of the2 general statutes be amended to allow two or more municipalities in any regionaltourism district to jointly appoint one representative to the regional tourism district boards of directors and allow such representative to vote for each such municipality at any meeting of the board of directors.
Statement of Purpose:
To allow two or more municipalities in any regional tourism district to jointly appoint onerepresentativetotheregionaltourism district boards of directors.
LCO No.
2326 1 of 1
Action History
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0309
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Commerce
-
DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE
-
Vote to Draft
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Commerce
Sponsors
- Dorinda Borer · Primary
- Catherine A. Osten · Primary
- Paul M. Formica · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Borer, Dorinda
- Catherine A. Osten Democratic
- Formica, Paul M.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (184)
184 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 184 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 430?
- SB 430 is sponsored by Borer, Dorinda, Catherine A. Osten (Democratic), and Formica, Paul M..
- What is the current status of SB 430?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 430?
- Track SB 430 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 430
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 430
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →