AN ACT CONCERNING THE ON-TIME PAYMENT OF WAGES.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 942 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 942.
You're tracking SB 942
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 942 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE ON-TIME PAYMENT OF WAGES.
Last action — MOVED TO FOOT OF CAL., SENATE
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
151 added · 39 removed151 line(s) added, 39 removed.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
942219 January Session, 2021 LCOSubstitute Senate Bill No.
3795942 ReferredSenate, toMarch 30, 2021 The Committee on LABORLabor ANDand PUBLICPublic EMPLOYEESEmployees Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(LAB)KUSHNER ANof ACTthe CONCERNING24th THEDist., ON-TIMEChairperson PAYMENTof OFthe WAGES.Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE ON-TIME PAYMENT OF WAGES.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) AAs fiscalused intermediary who provides payroll services for employers funded in wholethis orsection: in substantial part by state funds shall be deemed an employer solely for purposes of failure to timely pay wages under sections 31-71a to 31-71i, inclusive, of the general statutes.
(b)(1) A"Employer" delaymeans causeda byfiscal theintermediary failurewho toprovides meetpayroll theservices provisionsfunded ofin thiswhole sectionor shallin besubstantial deemedpart aby failurestate funds to timely pay wagespersonal undercare sectionsattendants, 31-71abut todoes 31-71i,not inclusive,include a consumer, as defined in section 17b-706 of the general statutes.statutes;
(c) Employers shall provide clear and timely(2) communication"Personal directlycare toattendant" employeeshas regardingthe paysame discrepancies,meaning paymentas confirmationprovided or a change in paymentsection status,17b-706 including,of butthe notgeneral limitedstatutes. to, providing employees:
(1)(b) SufficientEach noticeemployer priorshall topay theirweekly, payor date,once withevery specifictwo informationweeks, aboutall anywages, problemsalary withor submittedother timecompensation recordsdue whicheach wouldpersonal impactcare theattendant amounton ofa regular pay anday, employeedesignated willin receiveadvance onby theirthe payemployer, date;using one or more of the following methods:
(2)(1) aCash; specific and accessible option to address any such problem in LCO No.
3795(2) 1by ofnegotiable 2checks; Raised Bill No.
942(3) sufficientupon timean toemployee's correctwritten theor amountelectronic receivedrequest, onby theirdirect paydeposit; date;
andor (3)(4) aby timely method to receive pay between payroll cyclescard, whereprovided athe payrequirements discrepancyof hassection not31-71k beenof resolvedthe withingeneral twenty-fourstatutes hoursare aftersatisfied. the pay date.
SuchsSB942 method/ shallFile provideNo. for pay not later than forty-eight hours after such pay date.
For219 purposes1 ofsSB942 thisFile subsectionNo. "sufficient notice" means a length of time to allow an employee to respond to and correct any issues in time to be properly paid on their pay date.
(d)219 An(c) Each employer whoshall violatesprovide anyclear provisionand oftimely thiscommunication sectiondirectly shallto beeach finedpersonal twenty-fivecare dollarsattendant perregarding daypayment forconfirmation, eacha separatechange violation.in payment status or any pay discrepancy.
TheIf Laborthere Commissioneris a pay discrepancy or an issue with the time records submitted by the personal care attendant that will impact the amount of wages, salary or other compensation the personal care attendant will receive on the personal care attendant's regular pay day, the communication shall assess(1) allcontain specific information about the discrepancy or issue, and (2) provide the personal care attendant with sufficient time, and a specific and accessible method, to respond to the employer and attempt to correct such fines.discrepancy or issue prior to the personal care attendant's regular pay date.
If the pay discrepancy or issue has not been resolved twenty-four hours or more before the personal care attendant's regular pay day, the employer shall provide to the personal care attendant a method to receive wages, salary or other compensation between payroll cycles and not later than forty-eight hours after such discrepancy or issue has been resolved.
(d) An employer who violates any provision of this section shall be fined one hundred dollars per day for each separate violation from the date of the violation to the date such violation is corrected.
If the Labor Commissioner imposes a fine under the provisions of this section, the commissioner shall, not later than thirty days after collecting such fine, remit the amount collected to the personal care attendant who was subjected to the violation.
Section 1 from passage New section StatementLAB ofJoint Purpose:Favorable Subst.
TosSB942 requiring/ fiscalFile intermediariesNo. who provide payroll services for employers funded in whole or in substantial part by state funds to meet employer timely pay obligations.
[Proposed219 deletions2 aresSB942 enclosedFile inNo. brackets.
Proposed219 additionsThe arefollowing indicatedFiscal byImpact underline,Statement exceptand underlined.]eBill entireAnalysis textare prepared for the benefit of athe billmembers orof resolutionthe orGeneral aAssembly, sectionsolely offor apurposes billof orinformation, resolutionsummarization isand new,explanation itand isdo not LCOrepresent No.the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
3795In 2general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of 2informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Labor Dept.
GF - Potential Up to Up to Cost 113,075 114,905 State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Potential Up to Up to Benefits1 Cost 46,700 47,456 Social Services, Dept.;
GF - Potential See Below See Below Department of Developmental Services Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires fiscal intermediaries providing payroll services for state-funded personal care attendants (PCAs) to pay a fine of $100 per day for violations of the payroll-related requirements established under the bill.
To the extent the fiscal intermediary experiences increased cost to meet the requirements of the bill, the state contract with the fiscal intermediary may be adjusted to reflect such increases.
The Department of Social Services and the Department of Developmental Services support certain individuals, who are enrolled in a Home and Community-Based Medicaid waiver, with funding for PCAs.
The bill may also result in a potential federal revenue loss to the The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.3% of payroll in FY 22 and FY 23.
sSB942 / File No.
219 3 sSB942 File No.
219 extent the bill's provisions conflict with Medicaid waiver requirements.
There is a cost to the Department of Labor (DOL) the extent that the agency would have to investigate and hold hearings on potential violations.
Show all 65 changed lines (25 more)
The potential cost is estimated to be up to $159,775 in FY 22 and up to $162,361 in FY 23 for one full-time Wage Enforcement Agents and one part-time Staff Attorney.
3 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation.
2Per the Shortt vs.
New Milford Police Department (212 Conn.
294, 1989) Connecticut Supreme Court decision, DOL could administer a fine only after a PCA has exhausted all administrative remedies afforded them under a collective bargaining agreement.
3For context, in January 2021 446 PCA timesheets were delayed beyond the pay period due to errors.
sSB942 / File No.
219 4 sSB942 File No.
219 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 942 AN ACT CONCERNING THE ON-TIME PAYMENT OF WAGES.
SUMMARY This bill requires certain fiscal intermediaries that provide payroll services for paying state-funded personal care attendants (PCAs) to meet certain payroll-related requirements.
It applies to fiscal intermediaries that provide payroll services funded in whole or in substantial part by state funds to pay PCAs.
PCAs covered by the bill are people who provide personal care assistance under a state-funded program, such as the Connecticut Home Care Program for Elders.
The bill specifies that fiscal intermediaries do not include the consumers who receive PCA services.
The bill requires the fiscal intermediaries to pay the PCAs weekly or bi-weekly on a regular pay day designated in advance by the fiscal intermediary.Asunder thepayrolllawthat appliesto allemployersand employees, they must do so by cash, check, direct deposit (upon the employee’s request), or payroll card.
The bill further requires the fiscal intermediaries to provide clear and timely communication directly to each PCA about payment confirmation, a change in payment status, or any pay discrepancy.
If there is a pay discrepancy or issue with a PCA’s time records that will impact how much pay the PCA will receive on his or her regular pay day, the fiscal intermediary’s communication must (1) contain specific informationabout thediscrepancy or issueand(2) give thePCA enough time and a specific and accessible way to respond and try to fix the problem before the regular pay day.
If the problem has not been resolved at least 24 hours before the regular pay day, the fiscal intermediary must provide a way for the PCA to receive his or her pay sSB942 / File No.
219 5 sSB942 File No.
219 between payroll cycles and within 48 hours after the problem has been resolved.
The bill subjects violators to a $100 fine per violation, per day, until the violation is corrected.
If the labor commissioner imposes the fine, he must remit it to the PCA who was subjected to the violation within 30 days after collecting it.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage BACKGROUND Related Bill sHB 6560, reported favorably by the Human Services Committee, similarly requires fiscal intermediaries to provide PCAs with a way to address pay discrepancies and timely receive their pay.
COMMITTEE ACTION Labor and Public Employees Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 10 Nay 3 (03/18/2021) sSB942 / File No.
219 6
Show all 65 changed rows (25 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- File No. 219 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute LAB Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
MOVED TO FOOT OF CAL., SENATE
-
FILE NO. 219
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 168
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/29/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0304
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees
Sponsors
- Julie Kushner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Julie Kushner Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 942?
- SB 942 is sponsored by Julie Kushner (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 942?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 942?
- Track SB 942 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 942
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 942
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →