Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 970 — AN ACT CONCERNING EXTENDING THE TIME OF EXPIRATION OF CERTAIN LAND USE PERMITS.

Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 504

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

128 added · 18 removed

128 line(s) added, 18 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
970 January Session, 2021 LCO No.
321 January Session, 2021 Senate Bill No.
4099 Referred to Committee on PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Introduced by:
970 Senate, April 7, 2021 The Committee on Planning and Development reported through SEN.
(PD) AN ACT CONCERNING EXTENDING THE TIME OF EXPIRATION OF CERTAIN LAND USE PERMITS.
CASSANO of the 4th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING EXTENDING THE TIME OF EXPIRATION OF CERTAIN LAND USE PERMITS.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, any site plan approval made under this section on or after July 1, 2011, but prior to LCO 4099 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00970-R01 of 4 SB.docx Raised Bill No.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, any site plan approval made under this section on or after July 1, 2011, but prior to SB970 / File No.
970 the effective date of this section, that did not expire prior to March 10, 2020, except an approval made under subsection (j) of this section, shall expire not less than six years after the date of such approval and the commission may grant one or more extensions of time to complete all or part of the work in connection with such site plan, provided no approval, including all extensions, shall be valid for more than eleven years from the date the site plan was approved.
321 1 SB970 File No.
321 the effective date of this section, that did not expire prior to March 10, 2020, except an approval made under subsection (j) of this section, shall expire not less than six years after the date of such approval and the commission may grant one or more extensions of time to complete all or part of the work in connection with such site plan, provided no approval, including all extensions, shall be valid for more than eleven years from the date the site plan was approved.
(c) (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, for any LCO 4099 {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00972 of 4 R01-SB.docx } Raised Bill No.
(c) (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, for any subdivision of land for a project consisting of four hundred or more SB970 / File No.
970 subdivision of land for a project consisting of four hundred or more dwelling units and approved prior to July 1, 2011, that has not expired prior to May 9, 2011, any person, firm or corporation making such subdivision shallcomplete allwork inconnectionwithsuchsubdivision not later than the date fourteen years after the date of approval of the plan for such subdivision.
321 2 SB970 File No.
321 dwelling units and approved prior to July 1, 2011, that has not expired prior to May 9, 2011, any person, firm or corporation making such subdivision shallcomplete allwork inconnectionwithsuchsubdivision not later than the date fourteen years after the date of approval of the plan for such subdivision.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (2) of subsection (d) of this section, any permit issued under this section on or after July LCO 4099 {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-009703 of 4 R01-SB.docx } Raised Bill No.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (2) of subsection (d) of this section, any permit issued under this section on or after July 1, 2011, but prior to the effective date of this section, that did not expire prior to March 10, 2020, shall expire not less than six years after the date SB970 / File No.
970 1, 2011, but prior to the effective date of this section, that did not expire prior to March 10, 2020, shall expire not less than six years after the date of such approval.
321 3 SB970 File No.
321 of such approval.
4 from passage 22a-42a(g) PD Joint Favorable LCO 4099 {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00970- 4 of 4 R01-SB.docx }
4 from passage 22a-42a(g) PD Joint Favorable SB970 / File No.
321 4 SB970 File No.
321 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill extends the expiration period of certain land use permits.
This has no fiscal impact, as it is not anticipated to change the number of permits sought in any municipality.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None SB970 / File No.
321 5 SB970 File No.
321 OLR Bill Analysis SB 970 AN ACT CONCERNING EXTENDING THE TIME OF EXPIRATION OF CERTAIN LAND USE PERMITS.
SUMMARY This bill gives developers more time to complete an ongoing project without seeking reapproval.
It does so by extending the initial and extended deadlines for completing projects that require certain subdivision, wetlands, or site plan approval.
The bill applies to approvals that were (1) granted on or after July 1, 2011, but before the bill’s passage, and (2) unexpired on March 10, 2020.
The bill does not apply to site plan approvals for large-scale housing or business development projects.
When a planning or zoning commission, combined planning and zoning commission, or an inland wetlands agency approves a project, it must set an expiration date that falls within the timeframes the law specifies.
Consequently, a developer must complete the project before that date or resubmit it to the local commission or agency for approval.
Generally, under current law, the maximum timeframe, including extensions if permitted, is 10 years from the date of approval.
Under the bill, it is 11 years.
Executive Order (EO) 7JJ, § 3, issued on May 6, 2020, and subsequently extended, generally tolls the expiration dates for various land use approvals that were valid on March 10, 2020 (including site plan, wetlands, and subdivision approvals), thus pausing these approvals so they will not expire during the declared emergencies.
It is unclear what impact the bill has on approvals that are tolled by the EO.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage SB970 / File No.
Show all 63 changed rows (23 more)
Previous
Latest
321 6 SB970 File No.
321 PROJECT COMPLETION DEADLINES The bill generally extends the initial and extended expiration deadlinesthat apply to subdivision,wetlands, andrelatively small-scale site plans approvals that were (1) granted on or after July 1, 2011, but before the bill’s passage and (2) unexpired on March 10, 2020.
Table 1, below, shows these changes.
Table 1:
Deadlines and Extensions Under Current Law and the Bill Land Use Approval Current Law Bill (CGS §) Residential site plans for Deadline:
10 years after approval No change projects with 400 or more units (§ 8-3(j)) No extensions Business site plans for projects Deadline:
5-10 years after approval No change with at least 400,000 square feet (set locally) (§ 8-3(j)) Extension:
up to 10 years from approval Other site plans Deadline:
5 years after approval At least 6 (§ 8-3(i)) years after approval Extension:
up to 10 years from Up to 11 approval years from approval Subdivisions plans for 400 or Deadline:
10 years after approval 11 years after more dwelling units approval (§ 8-26g) No extensions No change Other subdivisions Deadline:
5 years after approval At least 6 (§ 8-26c(a)&(b)) years after approval Extension:
up to 10 years from Up to 11 approval years from approval SB970 / File No.
321 7 SB970 File No.
321 Wetlands permits associated Deadline:
10 years after approval orAt least 6 with another approval (e.g., site the date the associated land use years from plans and subdivisions) approval expires (whichever is approval (§ 22a-42a(d)(2)) earlier) Extension:
up to 10 years from Up to 11 approval years from approval Other wetlands Deadline:
2-5 years after approval At least 6 (§ 22a-42a(d)(2)) (set locally) years after approval Extension:
up to 10 years from Up to 11 approval years from approval BACKGROUND Related Executive Order Under EO 7JJ, the expiration date of various land use approvals is tolled during the declared emergencies (§ 3, issued on May 6, 2020, and subsequently extended).
The tolling provision applies only if the approval-holder was not in violation of the approval’s conditions on March 10, 2020, and does not violate them during the declared emergencies (a waiver of this requirement is available).
Related Bill sHB 6541, favorably reported by the Planning and Development Committee, for permits issued on or after July 1, 2021, delays the effective date of municipal inland wetlands permits to coincide with the effective period of related local land use approvals (e.g., special permits, zoning variances, site plans, subdivision plans).
COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Yea 26 Nay 0 (03/21/2021) SB970 / File No.
321 8
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 504

  2. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  3. ON CONSENT CALENDAR

  4. SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  5. SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  6. FILE NO. 321

  7. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 217

  8. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  9. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  10. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/06/21

  11. FILED WITH LCO

  12. Joint Favorable

  13. PUBLIC HEARING 0305

  14. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development

Sponsors

  • Rosa C. Rebimbas · Primary
  • Saud Anwar · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (185)

185 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 185 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 970?
SB 970 is sponsored by Rebimbas, Rosa C. and Saud Anwar (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 970?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 970?
Track SB 970 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 970

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 970

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →