Delaware 152nd General Assembly (2023-2024) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 6 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 256 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 6 AND 29 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO CONSUMER PROTECTION.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2024. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    9 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

This Act clarifies the Attorney General’s existing authority to enforce the State’s consumer protection laws, specifically the Attorney General’s ability to pursue non-penalty civil remedies, such as damages and restitution, without having to show that a person’s violation of a law or regulation enforced by the Department of Justice’s Division of Consumer Protection was wilful. This Act does not change the requirement that the Attorney General show that such a violation was wilful in order to obtain civil penalties from a court or hearing officer. Every other state that has a similar state of mind requirement in their consumer fraud law does not impose that state of mind requirement for non-penalty civil remedies. By harmonizing the language in the Consumer Fraud Act (Subchapter II, Chapter 25, Title 6 of the Code) and the Division of Consumer Protection’s enabling statute (Subchapter II, Chapter 25, Title 29 of the Code), this Act clarifies that Delaware is line with the other states. This Act also strikes outdated language in the Consumer Fraud Act requiring cases to be filed in specific counties, as the Superior Court and the Court of Chancery have both eliminated their historical county filing requirement. Additionally, this Act fixes inconsistencies with the Summary Cease and Desist Order process, by clarifying that an alleged violator must request a hearing in order to trigger the Division of Consumer Protection’s obligation to hold a hearing. This Act further clarifies the Summary Cease and Desist Order process, such as by making explicit the alleged violator’s right to postpone a hearing and final order, changing the various 10 day requirements to 15 business days, and removing the requirement for a complaint to accompany the original summary cease and desist order.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

131 added · 21 removed

131 line(s) added, 21 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Gay DELAWARE STATE SENATE 152nd GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
Gay & Rep.
1 TO SENATE BILL NO.
Griffith & Rep.
256 AMEND Senate Bill No.
Bush Sens.
256 on line 17 by deleting "pay damages," as it appears therein.
Lockman, Sokola, Wilson;
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
Reps.
256 on line 32 by deleting "above" as it appears therein.
Baumbach, Heffernan, Osienski DELAWARE STATE SENATE 152nd GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO.
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
256 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 6 AND 29 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO CONSUMER PROTECTION.
256 on line 34 by deleting "pay damages," as it appears therein.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
Section 1.
256 on line 42 by deleting "of this chapter." as it appears therein and inserting in lieu thereof "of this title.".
Amend § 2522, Title 6 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
§ 2522.
256 on line 43 by deleting "of this chapter." as it appears therein and inserting in lieu thereof "of this title.".
Proceedings brought by the Attorney General.
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
(a) Whenever it appears to the Attorney General that a person has engaged in, is engaging in or is about to engage in any practice declared by this subchapter to be unlawful, the Attorney General may institute an action in accordance with subchapter II of Chapter 25 of Title 29 in order to enjoin such practices or any acts being done in furtherance thereof.
256 on line 62 by deleting "damages," as it appears therein.
The complaint shall state the nature of the conduct constituting a violation of this subchapter and the relief sought thereunder.
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
Such action shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the county in which the alleged unlawful practice has been, is, or is about to be performed.
256 on line 73 by inserting “, which order must include findings of fact and conclusions of law sufficient to put the respondent on notice of the reasons for the issuance of the order.” after “order.” therein.
(b) If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that any person has wilfully violated this subchapter, upon petition to the court by the Attorney General in the original complaint or made at any time following the court’s finding of a wilful violation, the person shall forfeit and pay to the State a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each violation.
SYNOPSIS This Amendment clarifies the Summary Cease and Desist Order process by requiring that, when the Director of the Division of Consumer Protection, or the Director's designee, issues a cease and desist order pursuant to § 2525(c) of Title 29, the order must include findings of fact and conclusions of law sufficient to put the respondent on notice of the reasons for issuance of the order.
For purposes of this subchapter, a wilful violation occurs when the person committing the violation knew or should have known that the conduct was of the nature prohibited by this subchapter.
Finally, the Amendment makes technical changes to SB 256 to conform to the Legislative Drafting Manual.
(c) If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that any person has violated this subchapter, upon petition to the court by the Attorney General in the original complaint or made at any time following the court’s finding of a violation, the court may order the violator to cease and desist the unlawful conduct prospectively, pay damages, return any moneys obtained unlawfully, and when appropriate freeze designated assets of the violator, order restitution, rescission, or recoupment, or grant other relief appropriate to prevent violators from being unjustly enriched.
Section 2.
Amend § 2522, Title 29 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 2522.
Proceedings;
judicial remedies.
(a) The Attorney General and the Director shall have standing to seek, on behalf of the State, any remedy in this SD :
MD :
ALW Page 1 of 4 Released:
03/21/2024 03:23 PM chapter whenever it appears that a person has violated or is about to violate any provision of Chapter 25 of Title 6, any provision of Chapter 35 of Title 6, Chapters 51 through 67 of Title 25, Chapter 70 of Title 25, §§ 841, 914, 915, and 915A of Title 11, or any other law or regulation that the Division of Consumer Protection is authorized to enforce.
The Attorney General or the Director may initiate an investigation, administrative proceeding, or court proceeding to enjoin or sanction the unlawful conduct.
(b) If, in any court proceeding brought under subsection (a) of this section above, any person is found to have committed a wilful violation, the court shall order the violator to pay to the State a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each violation.
(c) If, in any court proceeding brought under subsection (a) of this section above, any person is found to have committed a violation, the court Where a wilful violation is found, any court entertaining the action may additionally order the violator to cease and desist the unlawful conduct prospectively, pay damages, return any moneys obtained unlawfully, and when appropriate freeze designated assets of the violator, order restitution, rescission, or recoupment, or grant to seek other relief appropriate to prevent violators from being unjustly enriched.
Section 3.
Amend § 2524, Title 29 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 2524.
Administrative remedies.
(a) After notice and an administrative hearing, any violation or apparent threat of violation of any provision of Chapter 25 of Title 6, or of any law or regulation the Division of Consumer Protection is charged to enforce, may be sanctioned by the issuance of a cease and desist order as provided in § 2525 of this chapter.
(b) If, in any administrative proceeding brought under § 2523 of this chapter, a person is found to have committed a wilful violation, the Director or hearing officer shall order the violator to pay to the State a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation.
After notice and an administrative hearing, any wilful violation of § 2513 or § 2532 of Title 6, or of a lawful cease and desist order of the Director or the hearing officer, may be sanctioned by an administrative penalty up to $5000 per violation, a cease and desist order, and an order of restitution, rescission, recoupment, or other relief appropriate to prevent violators from being unjustly enriched.
(c) After the expiration of the 30-day appeal period in which no appeal has been filed, if the violator fails to pay all penalties and restitution or other amounts administratively determined, the Director may file a complaint in any court of competent jurisdiction and obtain a judgment for the amounts that have not been paid.
The amounts shall be treated by the court as an unpaid debt, and the merits of the administrative findings may not be contested.
Section 4.
Show all 83 changed rows (43 more)
Previous
Latest
Amend § 2525, Title 29 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and SD :
MD :
ALW Page 2 of 4 Released:
03/21/2024 03:23 PM insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 2525.
Cease and desist orders.
(a) By agreement.
— At any time after it appears to the Director that a person has engaged in, is engaging in, or is about to engage in any practice declared to be unlawful by Chapter 25 of Title 6, Chapter 35 of Title 6, Chapters 51 through 67 of Title 25, Chapter 70 of Title 25, or any other laws and regulations which the Division of Consumer Protection is authorized to enforce, the Director may issue a cease and desist order pursuant to an agreement with such person.
Each such agreement may provide for:
(1) The immediate discontinuance of each practice set forth in the agreement;
(2) Any such relief, remedies, penalties, fines, damages, or recoveries authorized by this chapter, including restitution, rescission, recoupment, or other relief appropriate to prevent violators from being unjustly enriched;
and (3) Any other action deemed by the Director to be necessary to remedy such practice or practices.
(b) By administrative order.
— Upon the finding of a violation of any provision of Chapter 25 of Title 6, or of any law or regulation the Division of Consumer Protection is charged to enforce, after notice and a hearing, the designated hearing officer may issue a cease and desist order against the violator.
Such cease and desist order may provide for any relief as indicated in subsection (a) of this section above.
(c) By summary administrative order.
— (1) Where the Director in the Director’s discretion perceives an immediate threat to the public interest as a result of a violation of any provision of Chapter 25 of Title 6, or of any law or regulation the Division of Consumer Protection is charged to enforce, the Director may issue a summary cease and desist order ordering an immediate discontinuance of the unlawful practice identified in the order.
A complaint detailing the specific allegations against the alleged violator shall accompany any summary cease and desist order served upon the alleged violator.
Before issuing the summary order, the Director or the Director’s designee shall attempt to obtain voluntary compliance from the alleged violator by letter or telephone call.
(2) The complaint and summary cease and desist order shall be served upon the alleged violator by first class and certified mail to the alleged violator’s last known address.
Service shall be deemed effective upon mailing.
Within 10 15 business days after the mailing of the complaint and summary order, the alleged violator may request, in writing, a hearing on the charges.
An summary order that was not the subject of a hearing may not be appealed to the Superior Court.
(3) If the alleged violator makes a written request for a hearing, Tthe Division of Consumer Protection shall provide a hearing on the charges in the complaint within 10 15 business days after the issuance of the SD :
MD :
ALW Page 3 of 4 Released:
03/21/2024 03:23 PM 84 complaint and the cease and desist order receipt by the Director of Consumer Protection of the alleged violator’s written request for a hearing.
A written opinion and order, containing findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall issue within 10 15 business days after the close of the hearing.
(4) If the alleged violator makes a written request for a hearing but none is provided within 10 15 business days after the issuance of the order receipt by the Director of Consumer Protection of the written request for a hearing, the summary order shall expire at the end of the tenth fifteenth business day after it was issued the receipt by the Director of Consumer Protection of the written request for a hearing unless the alleged violator waives that alleged violator’s right to a prompt hearing by agreeing to a hearing at a later date.
If the alleged violator makes a written request for a hearing and one is provided within 10 15 business days of the receipt by the Director of Consumer Protection of the written request, but no decision order is issued within 10 15 business days after the close of the hearing, the summary order shall expire at the end of the tenth fifteenth business day after the close of the hearing, unless the alleged violator agrees to be bound by the summary order until a later date.
An order that has expired in accordance with the restrictions of this paragraph may not be reissued as a summary order.
(5) The order issued after the hearing may provide for any administrative remedy contained in § 2524 of this title.
Any person aggrieved by the order issued after the hearing shall have 30 days to appeal the order to the Superior Court, as provided in § 2523(d) of this title.
(6) Any person who wilfully violates a cease and desist order may be sanctioned as provided in § 2524(b) or § 2526 of this title.
SYNOPSIS This Act clarifies the Attorney General’s existing authority to enforce the State’s consumer protection laws, specifically the Attorney General’s ability to pursue non-penalty civil remedies, such as damages and restitution, without having to show that a person’s violation of a law or regulation enforced by the Department of Justice’s Division of Consumer Protection was wilful.
This Act does not change the requirement that the Attorney General show that such a violation was wilful in order to obtain civil penalties from a court or hearing officer.
Every other state that has a similar state of mind requirement in their consumer fraud law does not impose that state of mind requirement for non-penalty civil remedies.
By harmonizing the language in the Consumer Fraud Act (Subchapter II, Chapter 25, Title 6 of the Code) and the Division of Consumer Protection’s enabling statute (Subchapter II, Chapter 25, Title 29 of the Code), this Act clarifies that Delaware is line with the other states.
This Act also strikes outdated language in the Consumer Fraud Act requiring cases to be filed in specific counties, as the Superior Court and the Court of Chancery have both eliminated their historical county filing requirement.
Additionally, this Act fixes inconsistencies with the Summary Cease and Desist Order process, by clarifying that an alleged violator must request a hearing in order to trigger the Division of Consumer Protection’s obligation to hold a hearing.
This Act further clarifies the Summary Cease and Desist Order process, such as by making explicit the alleged violator’s right to postpone a hearing and final order, changing the various 10 day requirements to 15 business days, and removing the requirement for a complaint to accompany the original summary cease and desist order.
ALW Page 1 of 1 Released:
ALW Page 4 of 4 Released:
06/11/2024 01:30 PM 2711520169
03/21/2024 03:23 PM 2711520105
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By House. Votes: 37 YES 4 ABSENT

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce) in House with 7 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce Committee in House

  5. Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  6. Amendment SA 1 to SB 256 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  7. Amendment SA 1 to SB 256 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  8. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 Favorable, 1 On Its Merits

  9. Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

9 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 53 not signed on

Sponsors (9)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (53)

53 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 53 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5002
Democratic 19001
Republican 13001
Total 37004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Michael Ramone — Not Voting
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Sean Matthews — Not Voting
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stell Parker Selby — Yea
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Cyndie Romer Democratic Yea
DeShanna U Neal Democratic Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Not Voting
Sophie Phillips Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Not Voting
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeff Hilovsky Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea
Valerie Jones Giltner Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 13000
Republican 6000
Unaffiliated 2000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Kyle Evans Gay — Yea
Sarah McBride — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Kyra L. Hoffner Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
Russell Huxtable Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Eric Buckson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 256 do?
This Act clarifies the Attorney General’s existing authority to enforce the State’s consumer protection laws, specifically the Attorney General’s ability to pursue non-penalty civil remedies, such as damages and restitution, without having to show that a person’s violation of a law or regulation enforced by the Department of Justice’s Division of Consumer Protection was wilful. This Act does not change the requirement that the Attorney General show that such a violation was wilful in order to obtain civil penalties from a court or hearing officer. Every other state that has a similar state of mind requirement in their consumer fraud law does not impose that state of mind requirement for non-penalty civil remedies. By harmonizing the language in the Consumer Fraud Act (Subchapter II, Chapter 25, Title 6 of the Code) and the Division of Consumer Protection’s enabling statute (Subchapter II, Chapter 25, Title 29 of the Code), this Act clarifies that Delaware is line with the other states. This Act also strikes outdated language in the Consumer Fraud Act requiring cases to be filed in specific counties, as the Superior Court and the Court of Chancery have both eliminated their historical county filing requirement. Additionally, this Act fixes inconsistencies with the Summary Cease and Desist Order process, by clarifying that an alleged violator must request a hearing in order to trigger the Division of Consumer Protection’s obligation to hold a hearing. This Act further clarifies the Summary Cease and Desist Order process, such as by making explicit the alleged violator’s right to postpone a hearing and final order, changing the various 10 day requirements to 15 business days, and removing the requirement for a complaint to accompany the original summary cease and desist order.
Who sponsors SB 256?
SB 256 is sponsored by Kyle Evans Gay, Edward S. Osienski (Democratic), Russell Huxtable (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), David P. Sokola (Democratic), S. Elizabeth Lockman (Democratic), William Bush (Democratic), Nicole Poore (Democratic), and Paul S. Baumbach.
What is the current status of SB 256?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2024. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 256?
Track SB 256 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 256

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 256

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →