Connecticut 2019 Regular Session Status: In Committee 10 D cosponsors

SB 689 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE ISSUANCE OF EX PARTE RESTRAINING ORDERS.

Last action — PUBLIC HEARING 0401

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

100 added · 22 removed

100 line(s) added, 22 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Proposed Bill No.
General Assembly Committee Bill No.
2872 Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
6175 Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING THE ISSUANCE OF EX PARTE RESTRAINING ORDERS.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
Section 1.
Subsection (b) of section 46b-15 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2019):
(b) The application form shall allow the applicant, at the applicant's option, to indicate whether the respondent holds a permit to carry a pistol or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long gun eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one or more firearms or ammunition.
The application shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath which includes a brief statement of the conditions from which relief is sought.
Upon receipt of the application the court shall order that a hearing on the application be held not later than fourteen days from the date of the order except that, if the application indicates that the respondent holds a permit to carry a pistol or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long gun eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one or more firearms or ammunition, and the LCO No.
6175 1 of 4 Committee Bill No.689 court orders an ex parte order, the court shall order that a hearing be held on the application not later than seven days from the date on which the ex parte order is issued.
The court, in its discretion, may make such orders as it deems appropriate for the protection of the applicant and such dependent children or other persons as the court sees fit.
In making such orders ex parte, the court, in its discretion, may consider relevant court records if the records are available to the public from a clerk of the Superior Court or on the Judicial Branch's Internet web site.
In addition, at the time of the hearing, the court, in its discretion, may also consider a report prepared by the family services unit of the Judicial Branch that may include, as available:
Any existing or prior orders of protection obtained from the protection order registry;
information on any pending criminal case or past criminal case in which the respondent was convicted of a violent crime;
any outstanding arrest warrant for the respondent;
and the respondent's level of risk based on a risk assessment tool utilized by the Court Support Services Division.
The report may also include information pertaining to any pending or disposed family matters case involving the applicant and respondent.
Any report provided by the Court Support Services Division to the court shall also be provided to the applicant and respondent.
Such orders may include temporary child custody or visitation rights, and such relief may include, but is not limited to, an order enjoining the respondent from (1) imposing any restraint upon the person or liberty of the applicant;
(2) threatening, harassing, assaulting, molesting, sexually assaulting or attacking the applicant;
or (3) entering the family dwelling or the dwelling of the applicant.
Such order may include provisions necessary to protect any animal owned or kept by the applicant including, but not limited to, an order enjoining the respondent from injuring or threatening to injure such animal.
If an applicant alleges an immediate and present physical danger to the applicant or that the respondent could pose a physical danger to the applicant prior to the opportunity for a hearing, the court may issue an ex parte order granting such relief as it deems appropriate.
If a postponement of a hearing on the application is LCO No.
6175 2 of 4 Committee Bill No.
689 requested by either party and granted, the ex parte order shall not be continued except upon agreement of the parties or by order of the court for good cause shown.
If a hearing on the application is scheduled or an ex parte order is granted and the court is closed on the scheduled hearing date, the hearing shall be held on the next day the court is open and any such ex parte order shall remain in effect until the date of such hearing.
If the applicant is under eighteen years of age, a parent, guardian or responsible adult who brings the application as next friend of the applicant may not speak on the applicant's behalf at such hearing unless there is good cause shown as to why the applicant is unable to speak on his or her own behalf, except that nothing in this subsection shall preclude such parent, guardian or responsible adult from testifying as a witness at such hearing.
As used in this subsection, "violent crime" includes:
(A) An incident resulting in physical harm, bodily injury or assault;
(B) an act of threatened violence that constitutes fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury or assault, including, but not limited to, stalking or a pattern of threatening;
(C) verbal abuse or argument if there is a present danger and likelihood that physical violence will occur;
and (D) cruelty to animals as set forth in section 53-247.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 October 1, 2019 46b-15(b) Statement of Purpose:
To permit the court to issue ex parte restraining orders when the respondent could pose a physical danger to the applicant prior to the opportunity for a hearing.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] Co-Sponsors:
LOONEY, 11th Dist.
LOONEY, 11th Dist.;
Show all 65 changed rows (25 more)
Previous
Latest
MARONEY, 14th Dist.
SEN.
MOORE, 22nd Dist.
FONFARA, 1st Dist.;
FONFARA, 1st Dist.
MCCRORY, 2nd Dist.
BRADLEY, 23rd Dist.
CASSANO, 4th Dist.;
MCCRORY, 2nd Dist.
LESSER, 9th Dist.
KUSHNER, 24th Dist.
COHEN, 12th Dist.;
CASSANO, 4th Dist.
ABRAMS, 13th Dist.
LCO No.
6175 3 of 4 Committee Bill No.
689 SEN.
MARONEY, 14th Dist.;
HASKELL, 26th Dist.
MOORE, 22nd Dist.
LESSER, 9th Dist.
BRADLEY, 23rd Dist.;
FLEXER, 29th Dist.
KUSHNER, 24th Dist.
COHEN, 12th Dist.
HASKELL, 26th Dist.;
NEEDLEMAN, 33rd Dist.
FLEXER, 29th Dist.
ABRAMS, 13th Dist.
NEEDLEMAN, 33rd Dist.;
AN ACT CONCERNING THE TOLLING OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS.
REP.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
ELLIOTT, 88th Dist.
That the general statutes be amended to require that any period of incarceration for the respondent of a temporary restraining order be excluded from any calculation determining the period of time for which the order is in effect and that such order shall be continued upon the release from custody of the respondent.
S.B.
Statement of Purpose:
689 LCO No.
To provide that the time for which a temporary restraining order is in effect does not toll during any period for which the respondent is held in custody.
6175 4 of 4
LCO No.
2872 1 of 1
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. PUBLIC HEARING 0401

  2. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

  3. DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE

  4. Vote to Draft

  5. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

16 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 171 not signed on

Sponsors (16)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (171)

171 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 171 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 689?
SB 689 is sponsored by Cassano, Steve, Haskell, Will, John W. Fonfara (Democratic), Bob Duff (Democratic), Mae Flexer (Democratic), Elliott, Josh, Daugherty Abrams, Mary, Bradley, Dennis A., Marilyn Moore, Christine Cohen (Democratic), Norman Needleman (Democratic), Douglas McCrory (Democratic), Julie Kushner (Democratic), Martin M. Looney (Democratic), Matthew L. Lesser (Democratic), and James J. Maroney (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 689?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 689?
Track SB 689 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 689

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 689

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →