AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 29 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN RETIRED JUDICIAL OFFICER...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 234 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 234.
You're tracking SB 234
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 234 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 29 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN RETIRED JUDICIAL OFFICERS ACCEPTING AN ACTIVE DUTY DESIGNATION.
Last action — Signed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 03, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
13 sponsors
3 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (8 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
This Act updates the per diem compensation of any retired justice, judge, chancellor or vice chancellor accepting an active duty designation from $250 per day to 1/365 of the annual salary for such a judicial officer. This is consistent with the per diem compensation provided to retired justices of the peace and commissioners of the Superior Court, the Family Court, and the Court of Common Pleas accepting an active duty designation.
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This Act revises the compensation structure for retired judicial officers accepting active duty designations.
-
§ 5610
$250 per day→ 1/365 of the annual salary for such a retired justice, judge, chancellor or vice chancellorThe per diem compensation for retired judicial officers is changed from a fixed amount to a calculation based on their annual salary.
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Passed By House. Votes: 41 YES
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 6 Favorable
-
Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT
-
Reported Out of Committee (Elections & Government Affairs) in Senate with 2 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
-
Introduced and Assigned to Elections & Government Affairs Committee in Senate
Sponsors
- Darius J. Brown · Primary
- Sean M. Lynn · Primary
- Stephanie L. Hansen · Cosponsor
- Brian Pettyjohn · Cosponsor
- Nicole Poore · Cosponsor
- David P. Sokola · Cosponsor
- John "Jack" Walsh · Cosponsor
- William Bush · Cosponsor
- Ronald E. Gray · Cosponsor
- Krista Griffith · Cosponsor
- Kyle Evans Gay · Primary
- Stephen Smyk · Cosponsor
- Ernesto B Lopez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 49 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Darius J. Brown Democratic
- Sean M. Lynn Democratic
- Kyle Evans Gay
Co-sponsors (10)
- Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic
- Brian Pettyjohn Republican
- Nicole Poore Democratic
- David P. Sokola Democratic
- John "Jack" Walsh Democratic
- William Bush Democratic
- Ronald E. Gray Republican
- Krista Griffith Democratic
- Stephen Smyk
- Ernesto B Lopez
Not signed on (49)
49 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 49 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (41)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce C. Ennis | — | Yea |
| Colin Bonini | — | Yea |
| Ernesto B Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kyle Evans Gay | — | Yea |
| Sarah McBride | — | Yea |
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Yea |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 234 do?
- This Act updates the per diem compensation of any retired justice, judge, chancellor or vice chancellor accepting an active duty designation from $250 per day to 1/365 of the annual salary for such a judicial officer. This is consistent with the per diem compensation provided to retired justices of the peace and commissioners of the Superior Court, the Family Court, and the Court of Common Pleas accepting an active duty designation.
- Who sponsors SB 234?
- SB 234 is sponsored by Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Sean M. Lynn (Democratic), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), Nicole Poore (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), William Bush (Democratic), Ronald E. Gray (Republican), Krista Griffith (Democratic), Kyle Evans Gay, Stephen Smyk, and Ernesto B Lopez.
- What is the current status of SB 234?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 03, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 234?
- Track SB 234 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 234
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 234
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →