relative to the offense of identity fraud.
This bill modifies how identity fraud is defined and specifies related penalties. It aims to provide clearer legal guidelines regarding identity fraud.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 622 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 622.
You're tracking SB 622
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 622 — relative to the offense of identity fraud.
Last action — Signed by the Governor on 05/28/2026; Chapter 110; Effective 01/01/2027
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 25, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Kelly Ayotte (Republican) on May 29, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (4 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill updates the definition and penalties for identity fraud offenses.
This bill modifies how identity fraud is defined and specifies related penalties. It aims to provide clearer legal guidelines regarding identity fraud.
Summary
relative to the offense of identity fraud.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
43 added · 68 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 622 now includes a clear definition of "entity," which refers to organizations like corporations, trusts, and governments, making them subject to identity fraud laws. This change is significant because it explicitly states that both individuals and organizations can be victims of identity fraud, thereby broadening the scope of protection against this crime. By including entities, the law aims to strengthen accountability and deterrence against identity theft and fraud involving organizations.
CHAPTER 110 SB 622-FN - VERSIONFINAL ADOPTEDVERSION BY BOTH BODIES 01/29/2026 0094s SESSION 26-2194 09/08 SENATE BILL 622-FN AN ACT relative to the offense of identity fraud.
CHAPTER 110 SB 622-FN - VERSIONFINAL ADOPTEDVERSION BY BOTH BODIES 01/29/2026 0094s 26-2194 09/08 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to the offense of identity fraud.
1110:1 Identity Fraud;
2110:2 Identity Fraud.
or SB 622-FN - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES - Page 2 - (d) Poses as another person or entity, without the express authorization of such person or entity, with the purpose of obtaining confidential information about such person or entity, or another person or entity, that is not available to the general public.
3CHAPTER 110 SB 622-FN - FINAL VERSION - Page 2 - 110:3 Effective Date.
LBAApproved: 26-2194 1/30/26 SB 622-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE (AMENDMENT # 2026-0094s) AN ACT relative to the offense of identity fraud.
FISCALMay IMPACT:28, 2026 Effective Date:
EstimatedJanuary State01, Impact FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue Fund None Expenditures* Indeterminable Funding Source General Fund Appropriations* $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source None *Expenditure = Cost of bill *Appropriation = Authorized funding to cover cost of bill Estimated Political Subdivision Impact FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 County Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 County Expenditures Indeterminable Local Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Expenditures Indeterminable METHODOLOGY:
This bill adds, deletes, or modifies a criminal penalty, or changes statute to which there is a penalty for violation.
Therefore, this bill may have an impact on the judicial and correctional systems, which could affect prosecution, incarceration, probation, and parole costs, for the state, as well as county and local governments.
A summary of such costs can be found at:
https://gencourt.state.nh.us/lba/Budget/Fiscal_Notes/JudicialCorrectionalCosts.pdf AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Judicial Branch, Judicial Council, Department of Justice, Department of Corrections, New Hampshire Association of Counties, and New Hampshire Municipal Association
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered CHAPTERED FINAL VERSION Current pdf
- Version adopted by both bodies View text pdf
- Amended As Amended by the Senate pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Signed by the Governor on 05/28/2026; Chapter 110; Effective 01/01/2027
-
Enrolled (in recess of) 05/14/2026 HJ 13
-
Enrolled Adopted, VV, (In recess 05/14/2026); SJ 13
-
Ought to Pass: MA VV 04/23/2026 HJ 11
-
Committee Report: Ought to Pass 03/20/2026 (Vote 12-0; CC)
-
Executive Session: 03/20/2026 02:00 pm GP 159
-
Public Hearing: 03/18/2026 02:30 pm GP 159
-
Introduced (in recess of) 02/19/2026 and referred to Criminal Justice and Public Safety HJ 5 P. 127
-
Committee Amendment # 2026-0094s, AA, VV; 01/29/2026; SJ 2
-
Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-0094s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 01/29/2026; SJ 2
-
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0094s, 01/29/2026; Vote 3-0; CC; SC 3
-
Hearing: 01/13/2026, Room 100, SH, 01:45 pm; SC 48
-
Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Judiciary; SJ 1
Sponsors
- Howard Pearl · Cosponsor
- Timothy Lang · Cosponsor
- Denise Ricciardi · Cosponsor
- Cindy Rosenwald · Cosponsor
- Daniel Innis · Primary
- John Michael Potucek · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 409 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Daniel Innis Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Howard Pearl Republican
- Timothy Lang Republican
- Denise Ricciardi Republican
- Cindy Rosenwald Democrat
- John Michael Potucek
Not signed on (409)
409 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 409 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 622 do?
- relative to the offense of identity fraud.
- Who sponsors SB 622?
- SB 622 is sponsored by Howard Pearl (Republican), Timothy Lang (Republican), Denise Ricciardi (Republican), Cindy Rosenwald (Democrat), Daniel Innis (Republican), and John Michael Potucek.
- What is the current status of SB 622?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 25, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 622?
- Track SB 622 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 622
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 622
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →