SB570 — (New Title) relative to legislative ethics.
Last action — INTERIM STUDY
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
(New Title) relative to legislative ethics.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
46 added · 35 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 570 introduces clear definitions for "direct benefit" and "direct detriment," which will help legislators better determine conflicts of interest. It specifies that a direct benefit occurs when a legislator stands to gain financially from legislation they support, while a direct detriment applies to situations where they might suffer a financial loss due to that same legislation. This matters because it clarifies the rules around ethical decision-making for lawmakers, ensuring they avoid situations where their personal finances might influence their legislative actions. Additionally, the amendments expand the types of budget-related bills that may exempt legislators from recusal requirements, making it easier for them to engage in important budget discussions without complications from potential conflicts.
SB 570 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED BY THE SENATE 03/26/2026 1228s SESSION 26-2191 09/05 SENATE BILL 570 AN ACT relative to the legislative ethics committee and legislative ethics.
Executive Departments and Administration ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── AMENDED ANALYSIS This bill amendsadds definitions related to determining conflicts of interests for legislators.legislators and adds additional budget-related bills, subject to certain limitations, to the list of exceptions to the recusal requirements.
SB 570 - AS INTRODUCEDAMENDED BY THE SENATE 03/26/2026 1228s 26-2191 09/05 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT relative to the legislative ethics committee and legislative ethics.
Legislative Ethics Committee;
Definitions.
Amend RSA 14-B:1 by inserting after paragraph III-b the following new paragraph:
III-c.
“Public at large” means any reasonably large group of individuals or organizations that is similarly situated and likely to incur similar benefits or detriments as a result of legislation, including but not limited to professions or occupations, owners of widely held forms of property, or participants in a commercial marketplace.
2 Legislative Ethics Committee;
Definitions.
Amend RSA 14-B:1, V(a) to read as follows:
(a) A financial interest exists where a legislator or household member is an employee of, or receives compensation from, an individual or an organization which[, or a person or organization, whether nonprofit or for profit, by which the legislator is employed, or from which the legislator receives compensation, to act as the person's or organization's agent or advocate,] could stand to gain or lose anything of material value as a result of the official activity.
3 New Paragraph;
Conflicts of Interests for Legislators;
Definitions.
Amend RSA 14-C:2 by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraph:
II-a.
“Direct benefit” or “direct detriment” means a financial benefit or detriment that flows to the legislator or household member without any intervening action by an independent actor, consumer, or other instrumentality or action that is not under the control of the legislator or household member.
A “direct benefit” or “direct detriment” does not include a benefit or detriment that affects a marketplace or program in which the legislator or household member participates as a member of the public at large.
4 New Paragraph;
(a) “Organization”A means“direct benefit” exists when a legislator or household member will receive a financial benefit as the clientresult andof notthe enactment of legislation, unless the person,decision partnership,whether firm,the benefit will be received by the legislator or corporationhousehold actingmember asis lobbyist.subject to the discretion of an unrelated third party.
(b) A persondirect whobenefit registersexists asonly when a lobbyistlegislator pursuantadvocates toor RSAvotes 15:1in doesa notmanner "exerciseto substantialobtain influence over the affairspositive impact of the organization"legislation. unless he or she also satisfies the test set forth in RSA 14-C:4-c through 14-C:4-e.
5(b) EffectiveA Date.“direct detriment” exists when a legislator or household member will experience a negative impact on their financial interests as the result of the enactment of the legislation, unless the decision whether the detriment will be applied to the legislator or household member is subject to the discretion of an unrelated third partyA direct detriment exists only when a legislator advocates or votes in a manner to avoid the negative impact of the legislation.
(c) “Official legislative activity” is any activity that relates to official responsibilities, including the introduction of legislation, testifying before any legislative committee or state agency, voting in committee or in house or senate session, or otherwise participating in any decision of the legislature, county delegation, or any state agency.
(d) A legislator who has recused from participation in any official legislative activity pursuant to paragraph I or paragraph II of this section may testify before a legislative committee on the legislation from which the legislator has recused, provided that the legislator makes a written disclosure by filing a declaration of intent and makes a verbal disclosure identifying the conflict of interest before testifying.
2 Legislative Ethics;
Exceptions to Recusal for Conflicts of Interest.
Amend RSA 14-C:4-b to read as follows:
14-C:4-b Exceptions to Recusal for Conflicts of Interest.
A legislator shall not be required to recuse themselves from participation in any official legislative activity regarding preparation, review, or approval or disapproval of the state operating budget, state capital budget, trailer bill, or general revenue bills that involve business taxes, meals and rooms tax, tobacco tax, interest and dividends tax, real estate transfer tax, communications services tax, current use tax, statewide property tax, road tolls, income tax, sales tax, capital gains tax, or inheritance tax.
This exception from recusal shall not apply to participation in any SB 570 - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE - Page 2 - official legislative activity regarding amendments to the trailer bill when the amendment concerns solely subject matters as to which the legislator has a conflict of interest.
3 Effective Date.
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended As Amended by the Senate Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Interim Study Report: Recommended for Future Legislation 09/28/2026 (Vote 9-0; )
-
Executive Session: 09/15/2026 10:00 am GP 234
-
Refer for Interim Study: MA VV 05/14/2026 HJ 13 P. 25
-
Committee Report: Refer for Interim Study 05/06/2026 (Vote 12-0; CC) HC 19 P. 15
-
Executive Session: 05/06/2026 01:00 pm GP 232
-
Public Hearing: 04/15/2026 10:00 am GP 234
-
Introduced (in recess of) 03/26/2026 and referred to Legislative Administration HJ 5 P. 54
-
Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-1228s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/26/2026; SJ 7
-
Committee Amendment # 2026-1228s, AA, VV; 03/26/2026; SJ 7
-
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1228s, 03/26/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 11
-
Hearing: 01/28/2026, Room 103, SH, 09:10 am; SC 3
-
Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Executive Departments and Administration; SJ 1
Sponsors
- Ruth Ward · Cosponsor
- Sharon Carson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 413 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Sharon Carson Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Ruth Ward Republican
Not signed on (413)
413 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 413 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB570 do?
- (New Title) relative to legislative ethics.
- Who sponsors SB570?
- SB570 is sponsored by Ruth Ward (Republican) and Sharon Carson (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB570?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB570?
- Track SB570 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB570
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB570
Last checked for changes 2 days ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →