District of Columbia Council Period 26 Status: Enacted

B 26-0617 — Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Temporary Amendment Act of 2026

Last action — Law L26-0139, Effective from Jun 11, 2026 Published in DC Register Vol 73 and Page 008893, Expires on Jan 22, 2027

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Council
  4. ✓
    To Executive
  5. 5
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 02, 2026. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This act addresses transparency regarding body-worn camera footage in use of force incidents.

The legislation aims to improve the accessibility of body-worn camera footage related to use of force cases. It outlines the processes for requesting and disclosing this footage to promote transparency.

Summary

Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Temporary Amendment Act of 2026

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

140 added · 153 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill has been amended to explicitly require the release of body-worn camera footage from Metropolitan Police Department officers when there is an officer-involved death or serious use of force, even if it involves officers from other law enforcement agencies. This change is important because it ensures greater transparency and accountability in cases of serious incidents involving law enforcement, potentially building public trust and allowing for better oversight of police actions.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL A BILL 3 26-617 5 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 8 _________________________ To amend, on a temporary basis, the Body-Worn Camera Regulation and Reporting Requirements Act of 2015 and Chapter 39 of Title 24 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations to require release of body-worn camera recordings of Metropolitan Police Department Officers present in the event of an officer-involved death or serious use of force by a law enforcement officer other than a Metropolitan Police Department officer.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL AN ACT _________________________ IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________ To amend, on a temporary basis, section 3004 of the Body-Worn Camera Regulation and Reporting Requirements Act of 2015 and Chapter 39 of Title 24 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations to require the release of body-worn camera recordings of Metropolitan Police Department Officers present in the event of an officer-involved death or serious use of force by a law enforcement officer other than a Metropolitan Police Department officer.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(I) The names and body-worn camera recordings of all Metropolitan Police Department officers, as well as the names, as available, of all other law enforcement officers, directly involved in the officer-involved death or serious use of force;
“(I) The names and body-worn camera recordings of all Metropolitan Police Department officers, as well as the names, as available, of all other law enforcement officers, directly involved in the officer-involved death or serious use of force;
“(i-I) Notwithstanding sub-subparagraph (i) of this subparagraph, for incidents occurring between August 1, 2025, and the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, passed on emergency basis on March 3, 2026 (Enrolled version of Bill 26-XXX), within 10 business days after the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, passed on emergency basis on March 3, 2026 (Enrolled version of Bill 26-XXX), publicly release:
“(i-I) Notwithstanding sub-subparagraph (i) of this subparagraph, for incidents occurring between August 1, 2025, and the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, effective March 23, 2026 (D.C.
“(I) The names and body-worn camera recordings of all Metropolitan Police Department officers, as well as the names, as available, of all other law enforcement officers, directly involved in the officer-involved death or serious use of force;
Act 26-282;
73 DCR 5081) (“Body-Worn Camera Transparency Emergency Act”), within 10 business days after the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transpsarency Emergency Act, publicly release:
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(I) The names and body-worn camera recordings of all Metropolitan Police Department officers, as well as the names, as available, of all other law enforcement officers, directly involved in the officer-involved death or serious use of force;
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL (3) Sub-subparagraph (ii) is amended by striking the phrase “;
(3) Sub-subparagraph (ii) is amended by striking the phrase “;
(b) Subsection (e)(1) is amended by striking the phrase “officer-involved death or serious use of force” and inserting the phrase “officer-involved death directly involving an MPD officer or a serious use of force directly involving an MPD officer” in its place.
provided that MPD officers may review body-worn camera recordings to assist in initial report writing for incidents involving an officer-involved death directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD officer or serious use of force directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD officer prior to the effective date of the Body- Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, passed on emergency basis on March 3, 2026 (Enrolled version of Bill 26-616).”.
provided, that MPD officers may review body-worn camera recordings to assist in initial report writing for incidents involving an officer-involved death directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD officer or serious use of force directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD officer prior to the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transpsarency Emergency Act.”.
(1) A new paragraph (1A) is added to read as follows:
(1) New paragraphs (1A) and (1B) are added to read as follows:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(1A) “Law enforcement officer” means any officer, agent, or employee of the United States or any state or local government authorized by law or by a government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, or investigation of any violation of criminal or civil law.”.
“(1A) “Law enforcement officer” means any officer, agent, or employee of the United States or any state or local government authorized by law or by a government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, or investigation of any violation of criminal or civil law.
“(1B) “MPD” means the Metropolitan Police Department.”.
(A) Subparagraph (A) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer” and inserting the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer, or any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
(A) Subparagraph (A) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer” and inserting the phrase “MPD officer, or any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
(B) Subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer” and inserting the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer, or any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
(B) Subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer” and inserting the phrase “MPD officer, or any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
(C) Subparagraph (C) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer” and inserting the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer, or any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
(C) The lead-in language of subparagraph (C) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department officer” and inserting the phrase “MPD officer, or any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
(D) Subparagraph (D) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department canine” and inserting the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department canine, or canine of any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
(D) Subparagraph (D) is amended by striking the phrase “Metropolitan Police Department canine” and inserting the phrase “MPD canine, or canine of any other law enforcement officer while an MPD officer is present” in its place.
Sec.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL Sec.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL (1) Subsection 3900.9 is amended to read as follows:
(1) Subsection 3900.9 is amended to read as follows:
“(a) For any incident involving an officer-involved death directly involving an MPD member or a serious use of force directly involving an MPD member, members shall not review any BWC recordings to assist in initial report writing.
“3900.9.(a) For any incident involving an officer-involved death directly involving an MPD member or a serious use of force directly involving an MPD member, MPD members shall not review any BWC recordings to assist in initial report writing;
“(a) For any incident involving an officer-involved death directly involving an MPD member or a serious use of force directly involving an MPD member, MPD members shall not review any BWC recordings to assist in initial report writing;
provided, that MPD members may review body-worn camera recordings to assist in initial report writing for incidents involving an officer-involved death directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD member or serious use of force directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD member prior to the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, effective March 23, 2026 (D.C.
provided that MPD members may review body-worn camera recordings to assist in initial report writing for incidents involving an officer-involved death directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD member or serious use of force directly involving a law enforcement officer other than an MPD member prior to the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, passed on emergency basis on March 3, 2026 (Enrolled version of Bill 26-616).”.
Act 26-282;
73 DCR 5081).
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(i) The names and body-worn camera recordings of all Metropolitan Police Department officers, as well as the names, as available, of all other law enforcement officers, directly involved in the officer-involved death or serious use of force;
“(i) The names and body-worn camera recordings of all Metropolitan Police Department officers, as well as the names, as available, of all other law enforcement officers, directly involved in the officer-involved death or serious use of force;
“(A-i) Notwithstanding sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph, for incidents occurring between August 1, 2025, and the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, passed on emergency basis on March 3, 2026 (Enrolled version of Bill 26-XXX), within 10 business days after the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, passed on emergency basis on March 3, 2026 (Enrolled version of Bill 26-XXX), publicly release:
“(A-i) Notwithstanding sub-subparagraph (A) of this subparagraph, for incidents occurring between August 1, 2025, and the effective date of the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, effective March 23, 2026 (D.C.
Act 26-282;
73 DCR 5081), within 10 business days after the effective date of the Body- Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Emergency Amendment Act of 2026, effective March 23, 2026 (D.C.
Act 26-282;
73 DCR 5081), publicly release:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL (C) Sub-subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “;
ENROLLED ORIGINAL (C) Sub-subparagraph (B) is amended by striking the phrase “;
(b) Section 3999.1 is amended by adding a new definition between the definitions of “FOIA” and “metadata” to read as follows:
(b) Section 3999.1 is amended by adding a new definition between the definitions of “FOIA” and “Metadata” to read as follows:
(a) This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December ENGROSSED ORIGINAL 24, 1973 (87 Stat.
(a) This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto) and a 30-day period of congressional ENROLLED ORIGINAL review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat.
Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.
Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)).
___________________________________ Chairman Council of the District of Columbia _________________________________ Mayor District of Columbia 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Law L26-0139, Effective from Jun 11, 2026 Published in DC Register Vol 73 and Page 008893, Expires on Jan 22, 2027

  2. Act A26-0305 Published in DC Register Vol 73 and Page 006812

  3. Transmitted to Congress

  4. Returned from Mayor

  5. Signed by the Mayor and Enacted with Act Number A26-0305

  6. Transmitted to Mayor, Response Due on Apr 28, 2026

  7. Legislative Meeting

  8. Notice of Intent to Act on B26-0617 Published in the District of Columbia Register

  9. Legislative Meeting

  10. Retained by the Council

  11. B26-0617 Introduced by Councilmember Pinto at Office of the Secretary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Reading, CC

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Doni Crawford — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Matthew Frumin — Yea
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Wendell Felder — Yea
Zachary Parker — Yea

Official roll call →

Final Reading, CC

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Doni Crawford — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Matthew Frumin — Yea
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Wendell Felder — Yea
Zachary Parker — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does B 26-0617 do?
Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Temporary Amendment Act of 2026
Who sponsors B 26-0617?
B 26-0617 is sponsored by Brooke Pinto.
What is the current status of B 26-0617?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 02, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track B 26-0617?
Track B 26-0617 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on B 26-0617

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of B 26-0617

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →