HB 6590 — AN ACT CONCERNING SPEED LIMITS IN MUNICIPALITIES.
Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 482
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 17 removed10 line(s) added, 17 removed.
The Office of the State Traffic Administration may determine speed limits which are reasonable and safe on any state highway, bridge or parkway built or maintained by the state, and differing limits may be established for different types of vehicles, and may erect or cause to be erected signs LCO 4654 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590-R021 of 5 HB.docx Committee Bill No.
46546590 1 of 5 Committee Bill No.6590 indicating such speed limits.
(c) Any speed in excess of [such limits] a speed limit that has been LCO 4654 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-065902 of 5 R02-HB.docx } Committee Bill No.
46546590 2established in accordance with this section, other than speeding as provided for in section 14-219, as amended by this act, shall be prima facie evidence that such speed is not reasonable, but the fact that the speed of 5a Committeevehicle Billis No.lower than such [limits] speed limit shall not relieve the operator from the duty to decrease speed when a special hazard exists with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
6590 (c) Any speed in excess of [such limits] a speed limit that has been established in accordance with this section, other than speeding as provided for in section 14-219, as amended by this act, shall be prima facie evidence that such speed is not reasonable, but the fact that the speed of a vehicle is lower than such [limits] speed limit shall not relieve the operator from the duty to decrease speed when a special hazard exists with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
(a) No person shall operate any motor vehicle (1) upon any highway, road or any parking area for ten cars or more, at such a rate LCOof No.speed as to endanger the life of any occupant of such motor vehicle, but not the life of any other person than such an occupant;
4654(2) 3at ofa 5rate CommitteeLCO Bill4654 No.6590{\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590- of3 speed as to endanger the life of any5 occupantR02-HB.docx of} suchCommittee motorBill vehicle,No. but not the life of any other person than such an occupant;
(2)6590 at a rate of speed greater than fifty-five miles per hour upon any highway other than a highway specified in subsection [(b)] (d) of section 14-218a, as amended by this act, for which a speed limit has been established in accordance with the provisions of said subsection;
LCO 4654 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590- 4 of 5 R02-HB.docx } Committee Bill No.
4654 4 of 5 Committee Bill No.
3 October 1, 2019 14-219(a) and (b) StatementTRA Joint Favorable LCO 4654 R02-HB.docx }OUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590- 5 of Purpose:5
To allow local traffic authorities to establish lower speed limits on streets under their jurisdiction by holding a public hearing regarding such speed limits and providing notification of such speed limits to the Office of the State Traffic Administration.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] Co-Sponsors:
REP.
CONCEPCION, 4th Dist.
H.B.
6590 LCO No.
4654 5 of 5
Action History
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 482
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 404
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 256
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/03/19
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0227
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation
-
DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE
-
Vote to Draft
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation
Sponsors
- Marilyn Moore · Primary
- Anthony J. D'Amelio · Primary
- Carol Hall · Primary
- Julio A. Concepcion · Primary
- Tom Delnicki · Primary
- Roland J. Lemar · Primary
- Geraldo C. Reyes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- Marilyn Moore
- D'Amelio, Anthony J.
- Carol Hall Republican
- Julio A. Concepcion Democratic
- Tom Delnicki Republican
- Roland J. Lemar Democratic
- Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (180)
180 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 180 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 6590?
- HB 6590 is sponsored by Marilyn Moore, D'Amelio, Anthony J., Carol Hall (Republican), Julio A. Concepcion (Democratic), Tom Delnicki (Republican), Roland J. Lemar (Democratic), and Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 6590?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 6590?
- Track HB 6590 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 6590
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 6590
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →