Connecticut 2019 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 3 D · 2 R cosponsors

HB 6590 — AN ACT CONCERNING SPEED LIMITS IN MUNICIPALITIES.

Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 482

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

10 added · 17 removed

10 line(s) added, 17 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
The Office of the State Traffic Administration may determine speed limits which are reasonable and safe on any state highway, bridge or parkway built or maintained by the state, and differing limits may be established for different types of vehicles, and may erect or cause to be erected signs LCO No.
The Office of the State Traffic Administration may determine speed limits which are reasonable and safe on any state highway, bridge or parkway built or maintained by the state, and differing limits may be established for different types of vehicles, and may erect or cause to be erected signs LCO 4654 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590-R021 of 5 HB.docx Committee Bill No.
4654 1 of 5 Committee Bill No.6590 indicating such speed limits.
6590 indicating such speed limits.
LCO No.
(c) Any speed in excess of [such limits] a speed limit that has been LCO 4654 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-065902 of 5 R02-HB.docx } Committee Bill No.
4654 2 of 5 Committee Bill No.
6590 established in accordance with this section, other than speeding as provided for in section 14-219, as amended by this act, shall be prima facie evidence that such speed is not reasonable, but the fact that the speed of a vehicle is lower than such [limits] speed limit shall not relieve the operator from the duty to decrease speed when a special hazard exists with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
6590 (c) Any speed in excess of [such limits] a speed limit that has been established in accordance with this section, other than speeding as provided for in section 14-219, as amended by this act, shall be prima facie evidence that such speed is not reasonable, but the fact that the speed of a vehicle is lower than such [limits] speed limit shall not relieve the operator from the duty to decrease speed when a special hazard exists with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.
(a) No person shall operate any motor vehicle (1) upon any highway, road or any parking area for ten cars or more, at such a rate LCO No.
(a) No person shall operate any motor vehicle (1) upon any highway, road or any parking area for ten cars or more, at such a rate of speed as to endanger the life of any occupant of such motor vehicle, but not the life of any other person than such an occupant;
4654 3 of 5 Committee Bill No.6590 of speed as to endanger the life of any occupant of such motor vehicle, but not the life of any other person than such an occupant;
(2) at a rate LCO 4654 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590- 3 of 5 R02-HB.docx } Committee Bill No.
(2) at a rate of speed greater than fifty-five miles per hour upon any highway other than a highway specified in subsection [(b)] (d) of section 14-218a, as amended by this act, for which a speed limit has been established in accordance with the provisions of said subsection;
6590 of speed greater than fifty-five miles per hour upon any highway other than a highway specified in subsection [(b)] (d) of section 14-218a, as amended by this act, for which a speed limit has been established in accordance with the provisions of said subsection;
LCO No.
LCO 4654 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590- 4 of 5 R02-HB.docx } Committee Bill No.
4654 4 of 5 Committee Bill No.
3 October 1, 2019 14-219(a) and (b) Statement of Purpose:
3 October 1, 2019 14-219(a) and (b) TRA Joint Favorable LCO 4654 R02-HB.docx }OUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2019HB-06590- 5 of 5
To allow local traffic authorities to establish lower speed limits on streets under their jurisdiction by holding a public hearing regarding such speed limits and providing notification of such speed limits to the Office of the State Traffic Administration.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] Co-Sponsors:
REP.
CONCEPCION, 4th Dist.
H.B.
6590 LCO No.
4654 5 of 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 482

  2. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  3. HOUSE PASSED

  4. FILE NO. 404

  5. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 256

  6. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER

  7. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  8. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/03/19

  9. FILED WITH LCO

  10. Joint Favorable

  11. PUBLIC HEARING 0227

  12. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation

  13. DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE

  14. Vote to Draft

  15. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on

Sponsors (7)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (180)

180 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 180 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 6590?
HB 6590 is sponsored by Marilyn Moore, D'Amelio, Anthony J., Carol Hall (Republican), Julio A. Concepcion (Democratic), Tom Delnicki (Republican), Roland J. Lemar (Democratic), and Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 6590?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 6590?
Track HB 6590 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 6590

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 6590

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →