Delaware 151st General Assembly (2021-2022) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 4 R · 3 D cosponsors

HB 490 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC MONITORING FOR VEHICLE OBSTRUCTIONS SYSTEM.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 13, 2022. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    3 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (4 R · 3 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Delaware’s Motor Vehicle Statutes contemplate for vehicle obstructing traffic enforcement by law enforcement agencies. It is not always possible for law enforcement officers to enforce the right-of-way regulations in areas effectively due to a number of considerations, including officer availability and safety. This bill would enable the state and municipal authorities to enforce right-of-way regulations in identified areas more effectively. This bill only imposes civil penalties for violations and does not impose points on an individual’s driver’s license.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

199 added · 9 removed

199 line(s) added, 9 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Schwartzkopf HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
Schwartzkopf & Rep.
1 TO HOUSE BILL NO.
D.
490 AMEND House Bill No.
Short & Sen.
490 on line 57 by deleting "§ 4169(c)” as it appears therein and inserting in lieu thereof “§ 4205”.
Lopez Reps.
SYNOPSIS This amendment makes a technical correction by referring to the correct section of title 21 relating to violations of Chapter 41 of Chapter 21.
S.
Moore, Osienski, Smyk;
Sens.
Hocker, Pettyjohn, Walsh, Wilson HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO.
490 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC MONITORING FOR VEHICLE OBSTRUCTIONS SYSTEM.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1.
Amend Chapter 41, Title 21 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strik though and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 4137.
Electronic Traffic Monitoring for Vehicle Obstructions System.
This section establishes the authority for the State and municipalities in the State to use an electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system to assist in the enforcement of right-of way pursuant to §§4130 and 4179(c) of this title.
This section does not establish a new violation.
(a) Definitions.
As used in this section:
(1) “Owner” means the registered owner of such vehicle on record with this or any other state;
provided, however, that in the event that the owner is a vehicle leasing company, the “owner,” for purposes of this subsection, shall mean the person shown on the records to be the lessee of such vehicle.
“Owner” does not include vehicle rental companies.
(2) “Electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system” means a device with 1 or more motor vehicle sensors that is capable of producing a recorded image of a motor vehicle whose position within an intersection violates right-of way regulations.
(3) “Electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system operator” means an individual who has been trained and certified to operate an electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system.
(4) “Recorded image” means an image recorded by an electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system and includes any of the following:
a.
A photograph.
b.
A microphotograph.
c.
A digital image.
MAW Page 1 of 1 Released:
MAW Page 1 of 7 Released:
06/21/2022 11:59 AM 2141510773
06/13/2022 10:50 AM d.
A video.
e.
Any other medium used to store images or sounds to be seen or heard later.
(b) This section does not apply to an authorized emergency vehicle operating in compliance with § 4106 of this title.
(c) (1) An electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system may be installed or used to record images of a motor vehicle traveling through an intersection within the State.
(2) An electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system may be installed or used to record images of a motor vehicle traveling on roadways with a Principal Arterial or Other Arterial functional classification as defined by the Department of Transportation, under all of the following conditions:
a.
A study approved by the Department of Transportation showing that intersection blockages are frequent is required for an intersection to be eligible under this chapter.
Show all 154 changed rows (114 more)
Previous
Latest
The intersection will remain eligible for up to one year after the acceptance of the study by the Department of Transportation.
b.
Prior to the implementation of the system at a specific location, all of the following is required:
1.
Within a municipality, the municipality must approve the intersection eligible for monitoring under this chapter, consistent with this chapter.
2.
The Department of Transportation and applicable police agency must provide notice on a publicly accessible website of the intended use of the system at least 14 days prior to implementation.
(d) A vendor shall be selected through an open competitive procurement process to administer the system.
To assure integrity and propriety, a person involved in the administration or enforcement of the vehicle obstructing traffic monitoring system may not own any direct interest or equity in the vendor used.
(e) Funding;
revenue.
(1) The Department of Transportation may initiate tasks with the selected vendor utilizing eligible funding sources.
No separate funding is allocated through this section.
(2) Revenue generated through the use of the system may be used to pay eligible costs to the vendor, staff required to implement this section, and consultant fees for administration of the programs.
(3) Any revenue collected above and beyond those required for the operation of the program as noted above may only be used for education, enforcement, or engineering purposes, related to transportation safety.
(f) Liability for failure of owner to comply with right-of-way regulations.
(1) The Department of Safety and Homeland Security shall provide for the establishment of a program imposing monetary liability on the owner of a motor vehicle for failure to comply with right-of-way regulations in HD :
NSW :
MAW Page 2 of 7 Released:
06/13/2022 10:50 AM accordance with the provisions of this subsection.
This subsection allows the State and municipalities to install and operate electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions systems.
(2) The owner or operator of a vehicle which has failed to comply with right-of-way regulations, as evidenced by information obtained from the system, shall be subject to a civil or administrative assessment consistent with those established under §4169(c) of this title.
Court costs or similar administrative fees not to exceed $35 may also be assessed against an owner or operator who requests a hearing to contest the violation and is ultimately found or pleads responsible for the violation or who fails to pay or contest the violation in a timely manner.
No assessments and court costs other than those specified in this subsection may be imposed.
A violation for which a civil assessment is imposed under this subsection shall not be classified as a criminal offense and shall not be made a part of the operating record of the person upon whom such liability is imposed, nor shall it be used for insurance purposes in the provision of motor vehicle insurance.
(g) Electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system requirements.
(1) An operator shall complete training by the manufacturer of the system in the procedures for setting up, testing, and operating the vehicle obstructing traffic monitoring system.
(2) Upon completion of the training, the manufacturer shall issue a signed certificate to the operator.
(3) The certificate of training shall be admitted into evidence in any court proceeding for a violation of this section.
(4) An operator shall fill out and sign a daily set-up log for the system that does all of the following:
a.
States the date and time when and the location where the system was set up.
b.
States that the operator successfully performed, and the device passed, the manufacturer-specified self- tests of the system before producing a recorded image.
c.
Is kept on file.
d.
Is n admitted into evidence in any court proceeding for a violation of this section.
(5) The system shall undergo an annual calibration check performed by an independent calibration laboratory which shall issue a signed certificate of calibration after the annual calibration check that shall be kept on file and be admitted into evidence in any court proceeding for a violation of this section.
(h) Violation criteria For a violation to occur, a motor vehicle must be located within a conflicting left-turn or through vehicle’s path of travel following the termination of the violating vehicle’s right-of-way and subsequent all-red clearance interval.
(i) Summons and notice of violation.
HD :
NSW :
MAW Page 3 of 7 Released:
06/13/2022 10:50 AM 83 Any nonresident owner or operator of any motor vehicle which is operated or driven on the public streets, roads, turnpikes or highways of this State is deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Delaware courts for purposes of this subsection.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Delaware Code, a summons for a violation of this subsection may be executed by mailing to any Delaware resident or nonresident by first class mail a copy thereof to the address of the owner of the vehicle as shown on the records of the Division of Motor Vehicles of this or any other state, as appropriate.
Collection actions, including default judgment and execution, may proceed based upon jurisdiction obtained through the mailing by first class mail of a summons and subsequent court notices pursuant to this subsection.
Every initial mailing shall include all of the following:
(1).
Name and address of the owner of the vehicle.
(2) Registration number of the motor vehicle involved in the violation.
(3)Violation charges.
(4) Location where the violation occurred.
(5) Date and time of the violation.
(6) Copies of 2 or more photographs, or microphotographs or other recorded images, taken as proof of the violation.
(7) Amount of the civil assessment imposed and the date by which the civil assessment should be paid.
(8) Information advising the summonsed person of the matter, time and place by which liability as alleged in the notice may be contested, and warning that the failure to pay the civil assessment or to contest liability in a timely manner is an admission of liability and may result in a judgment being entered against the summonsed person and/or the denial of the registration or the renewal of the registration of any of the owner’s vehicles.
(9) Notice of the summonsed person’s ability to rebut the presumption that the summonsed person was the operator of the vehicle at the time of the alleged violation and the means for rebutting such presumption.
(j) Payment by voluntary assessment.
Persons electing to pay by voluntary assessment shall make payments to the entity designated on the summons for payment.
Such entity may be the Justice of the Peace Court or an entity designated by the Court or the Department of Safety and Homeland Security.
Procedures for payment under this subsection shall be as provided by court rule or policy directive of the Justice of the Peace Court or by regulation of the Department of Safety and Homeland Security and shall be in lieu of the procedures set forth in §709 of this title.
(k) Procedures to contest the violation.
HD :
NSW :
MAW Page 4 of 7 Released:
06/13/2022 10:50 AM A person receiving the summons pursuant to this subsection may request a hearing to contest the violation by notifying, in writing, the entity designated on the summons within 20 days of the date.
Upon receipt of a timely request for a hearing a civil hearing shall be scheduled and the defendant notified of the hearing date by first class mail.
A civil hearing shall be held by the Justice of the Peace Court or such other entity as designated by the Department of Safety and Homeland Security.
The hearing may be informal and shall be held in accordance with Justice of the Peace Court rules or policy directive or regulation of the Department of Safety and Homeland Security.
Additional administrative collection processes may be established by court rule, policy directive, regulation, code or ordinance, as applicable.
Costs for such hearing shall not be assessed against the prevailing party.
There shall be no right of transfer to the Court of Common Pleas.
(l) Failure to pay or successfully contest the violation.
(1) If the owner or an operator identified by the owner fails to pay the civil penalty by voluntary assessment, request a hearing within the required time or submit an affidavit stating that the owner or operator identified was not the driver, the Division of Motor Vehicles may refuse to renew the registration of the owner’s vehicle operated at the time the summons was issued.
If the owner or an operator identified by the owner is found responsible at a hearing and fails to pay as ordered by the Court, or requests a hearing and fails to appear, the Division of Motor Vehicles shall suspend the license of the owner or operator.
(2) Upon receiving a record of failure to comply, the Clerk may enter a civil traffic judgment against the owner or operator in the amount of the civil penalty, costs, and any applicable penalty amounts, giving credit for any amount paid.
Such judgment may, upon motion, be transferred by the Court to the civil docket.
Any judgment so transferred may be executed and enforced or transferred in the same manner as other judgments of the Court and the Division of Public Safety or its designee, shall have authority to seek such execution, enforcement or transfer.
(m) Proof of violation.
Proof of a violation of this subsection shall be evidenced by information obtained from the electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system authorized pursuant to this subsection.
A certificate, or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images produced by an electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstruction system shall constitute prima facie evidence of the facts contained therein, if the certificate, or facsimile thereof, is sworn to or affirmed by a technician employed to impose assessments pursuant to this subsection, or a technician employed by a state agency or entity designated by a state agency for the purposes of this section.
Any photographs, microphotographs, videotape or other recorded images evidencing such a violation shall be available for inspection in any proceeding to adjudicate the liability for such violation pursuant to regulation, ordinance or other law adopted pursuant to this subsection.
HD :
NSW :
MAW Page 5 of 7 Released:
06/13/2022 10:50 AM (n) Presumptions.
(1) The owner of any vehicle found to be in violation of this subsection shall be held prima facie responsible for such violation in the same manner as provided for under § 7003 of this title, unless the owner can furnish evidence that the vehicle was, at the time of the violation, in the care, custody or control of another person.
Such presumption shall be rebutted if the owner does either of the following:
a.
Furnishes an affidavit by regular mail to the entity indicated on the summons that the owner was not the operator of the vehicle at the time of the alleged violation and provides the name and address of the person or company who leased, rented or otherwise had the care, custody or control of the vehicle, or attaches a certified copy of a police report showing that the vehicle or license plate or plates thereof had been reported to the police as stolen prior to the time of the alleged violation of this subsection.
b.
Provides proof in court or to the entity handling the administrative appeal process that the owner was not the operator of the vehicle at the time of the alleged violation.
(2) A summons may be issued to a person identified by affidavit or evidence in court as the actual operator of the vehicle shown to have violated the right-of-way regulations.
There shall be a presumption that the person so identified was the driver.
The presumption may be rebutted as described in this subsection.
(o) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section to the contrary, if the motor vehicle which is found by the electronic traffic monitoring for vehicle obstructions system to have failed to comply with the right-of-way regulations is commercially licensed, then the owner of that vehicle shall be sent notice of the date, time and location of the violation with 2 photographs thereof.
Within 10 days of the receipt of said notice, the owner of the vehicle shall provide the law- enforcement agency which has issued the summons with the name and address of the driver of the vehicle at the date, time and location of the violation and, within the same time period, shall provide the driver of the vehicle with the photographs of the violation.
After receipt by the law-enforcement agency which has issued the summons of the name and address of the driver of the vehicle at the time of the violation, the driver of the vehicle shall be prima facie responsible for such violation in the same manner as provided for under § 7003 of Title 21 and shall be subject to the provisions of this section.
Failure of the owner of the vehicle found to be in violation of subsection (d) to provide the name and address of the driver at the time of the violation within the period prescribed shall cause the owner to be held responsible as set forth in paragraph (d)(5) of this section.
(p) Any person found responsible for a civil traffic offense shall have a right of appeal only in those cases in which the civil penalty imposed exceeds $100, upon giving bond with surety satisfactory to the judge before whom such person was found responsible, such appeal to be taken and bond given within 15 days from the time of the finding of responsible.
HD :
NSW :
MAW Page 6 of 7 Released:
06/13/2022 10:50 AM Such appeal shall operate as a stay or supersedeas of all proceedings in the court below in the same manner that a certiorari from the Superior Court operates.
The taking of such appeal shall constitute a waiver by the appellant of the appellant’s right to a writ of certiorari in the Superior Court.
SYNOPSIS Delaware’s Motor Vehicle Statutes contemplate for vehicle obstructing traffic enforcement by law enforcement agencies.
It is not always possible for law enforcement officers to enforce the right-of-way regulations in areas effectively due to a number of considerations, including officer availability and safety.
This bill would enable the state and municipal authorities to enforce right-of-way regulations in identified areas more effectively.
This bill only imposes civil penalties for violations and does not impose points on an individual’s driver’s license.
HD :
NSW :
MAW Page 7 of 7 Released:
06/13/2022 10:50 AM 2141510735
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By Senate. Votes: 18 YES 3 NO

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Transportation) in Senate with 1 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Transportation Committee in Senate

  5. Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT

  6. Amendment HA 1 to HB 490 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

  7. Amendment HA 1 to HB 490 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  8. Reported Out of Committee (Administration) in House with 3 On Its Merits, 1 Unfavorable

  9. Introduced and Assigned to Administration Committee in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 52 not signed on · 3 voted No

Co-sponsors (7)

Not signed on (52)

52 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 52 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 18 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4100
Democratic 11000
Republican 3200
Total 18300
% of votes cast 86%14%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Colin Bonini — Nay
Ernesto B Lopez — Yea
Kyle Evans Gay — Yea
Sarah McBride — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Nay
Dave G. Lawson Republican Nay
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Democratic 15001
Republican 12000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
Charles "Bud" M. Freel — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Yea
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stephen Smyk — Yea
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Not Voting
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 490 do?
Delaware’s Motor Vehicle Statutes contemplate for vehicle obstructing traffic enforcement by law enforcement agencies. It is not always possible for law enforcement officers to enforce the right-of-way regulations in areas effectively due to a number of considerations, including officer availability and safety. This bill would enable the state and municipal authorities to enforce right-of-way regulations in identified areas more effectively. This bill only imposes civil penalties for violations and does not impose points on an individual’s driver’s license.
Who sponsors HB 490?
HB 490 is sponsored by Daniel B. Short (Republican), Gerald W. Hocker (Republican), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), Sherae'a Moore (Democratic), Edward S. Osienski (Democratic), Stephen Smyk, Ernesto B Lopez, and Peter C. Schwartzkopf.
What is the current status of HB 490?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 13, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 490?
Track HB 490 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 490

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 490

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →