Delaware 151st General Assembly (2021-2022) Status: Enacted 11 D cosponsors

SB 211 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 19 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    3 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

This Act prohibits employers from requesting or requiring that an applicant for employment disclose the applicant’s age, date of birth, or dates of attendance or graduation from an educational institution in an initial application for employment, unless the employer is requesting the information because of a bona fide occupational qualification or to comply with state or federal law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

70 added · 11 removed

70 line(s) added, 11 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Mantzavinos DELAWARE STATE SENATE 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
Mantzavinos & Sen.
1 TO SENATE BILL NO.
Brown & Rep.
211 AMEND Senate Bill No.
Griffith Sens.
211 by deleting line 8 in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following:
Bonini, Gay, Hansen, Lockman, S.
“with any provision of state or federal law, or the requirements of any regulatory, licensing, or certifying body or organization.” SYNOPSIS This amendment expands upon the reasons that an employer can request or require prospective employees to disclose their age, date of birth, dates of attendance at, or date of graduation from, an educational institution to include circumstances where the information is required by any regulatory, licensing, or certifying body or organization.
McBride, Pinkney, Sokola, Sturgeon, Townsend;
Reps.
Baumbach, Heffernan, Longhurst, K.
Williams DELAWARE STATE SENATE 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO.
211 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 19 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1.
Amend Chapter 7, Title 19 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and by redesignating accordingly:
§ 711.
Unlawful employment practices, employer practices.
(l) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to request or require a prospective employee’s age, date of birth, dates of attendance at or date of graduation from an educational institution on an initial employment application, provided that the provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any employer requesting or requiring such information (1) based on a bona fide occupational qualification or need, or (2) when such information is required to comply with any provision of state or federal law.
(l) (m) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter:
(1) It shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual or for an employer, labor organization or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program on the basis of religion, genetic information, age, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, genetic information, age, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise;
and (2) It shall not be an unlawful employment practice for a school, college, university or other educational institution or institution of learning to hire and employ employees of a particular religion if such school, college, university or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association or society or if the SD :
MD :
CBK Page 1 of 3 Released:
01/10/2022 01:18 PM curriculum of such school, college, university or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of a particular religion.
(m) (n) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to apply different standards of compensation or different terms, conditions or privileges of employment pursuant to a bona fide seniority or merit system or a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production or to employees who work in different locations, provided that such differences are not the result of an intention to discriminate because of race, marital status, genetic information, color, age, religion, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin, nor shall it be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to give and to act upon the results of any professionally developed ability test provided that such test, its administration or action upon the results is not designed, intended or used to discriminate because of race, marital status, genetic information, color, religion, age, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
(n) (o) Nothing contained in this subchapter as it applies to discrimination because of age or sex shall be interpreted to affect or interfere with the retirement policy or system of any employer or the underwriting or administration of a bona fide employee welfare or benefit plan, provided that such policy, system or plan is not merely a subterfuge to evade the purpose of this subchapter.
(o) (p) (1) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prohibit compulsory retirement of any employee who has attained 65 years of age, and who, for the 2-year period immediately before retirement, is employed in a bona fide executive or a high policy-making position, if such employee is entitled to an immediate nonforfeitable annual retirement benefit from a pension, profit sharing, savings or deferred compensation plan, or any combination of such plans, of the employer of such an employee, which equals, in the aggregate, at least $44,000.
(2) In applying the retirement benefit test of paragraph (o)(1) of this section, if any such retirement benefit is in a form other than a straight life annuity (with no ancillary benefits), or if employees contribute to any such plan or make rollover contributions, such benefit shall be adjusted in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary, United States Department of Labor, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
§ 631(c)(2), so that the benefit is the equivalent of a straight life annuity (with no ancillary benefits) under a plan to which employees do not contribute and under which no rollover contributions are made.
(p) (q) Nothing in this subchapter shall be interpreted to require employers to offer health, welfare, pension or other benefits to persons associated with employees on the basis as such benefits are afforded to the spouses of married employees.
SD :
MD :
CBK Page 2 of 3 Released:
01/10/2022 01:18 PM (q) (r) Nothing in this subchapter shall affect the ability of an employer to require employees to adhere to reasonable workplace appearance, grooming and dress standards not precluded by other provisions of state or federal law, except that an employer shall allow an employee to appear, groom and dress consistent with the employee’s gender identity.
SYNOPSIS This Act prohibits employers from requesting or requiring that an applicant for employment disclose the applicant’s age, date of birth, or dates of attendance or graduation from an educational institution in an initial application for employment, unless the employer is requesting the information because of a bona fide occupational qualification or to comply with state or federal law.
FJM :
MD :
CBK Page 1 of 1 Released:
CBK Page 3 of 3 Released:
01/19/2022 03:19 PM 4761510208
01/10/2022 01:18 PM 4761510178
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By House. Votes: 34 YES 4 NO 3 ABSENT

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Labor) in House with 7 Favorable, 2 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Labor Committee in House

  5. Passed By Senate. Votes: 16 YES 5 NO

  6. Amendment SA 2 to SB 211 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 19 YES 2 NO

  7. Amendment SA 1 to SB 211 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  8. Amendment SA 2 to SB 211 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  9. Amendment SA 1 to SB 211 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  10. Reported Out of Committee (Labor) in Senate with 3 Favorable, 3 On Its Merits

  11. Introduced and Assigned to Labor Committee in Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 46 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Not signed on (46)

46 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 46 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 34 Yea · 4 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11002
Democratic 15001
Republican 8400
Total 34403
% of votes cast 83%10%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
Charles "Bud" M. Freel — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Not Voting
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stephen Smyk — Not Voting
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Not Voting
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Nay
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Nay
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Nay
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Nay
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 16 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
Democratic 11000
Republican 0500
Total 16500
% of votes cast 76%24%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Colin Bonini — Yea
Ernesto B Lopez — Yea
Kyle Evans Gay — Yea
Sarah McBride — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Nay
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Nay
Dave G. Lawson Republican Nay
David L. Wilson Republican Nay
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 211 do?
This Act prohibits employers from requesting or requiring that an applicant for employment disclose the applicant’s age, date of birth, or dates of attendance or graduation from an educational institution in an initial application for employment, unless the employer is requesting the information because of a bona fide occupational qualification or to comply with state or federal law.
Who sponsors SB 211?
SB 211 is sponsored by Kyle Evans Gay, Colin Bonini, Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Krista Griffith (Democratic), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), S. Elizabeth Lockman (Democratic), Marie Pinkney (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), Debra Heffernan (Democratic), Kimberly Williams (Democratic), Valerie Longhurst, Paul S. Baumbach, and Sarah McBride.
What is the current status of SB 211?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 11, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 211?
Track SB 211 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 211

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 211

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →