SCA 2 — A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Article IVA thereto, relating to expenditure limits.
Last action — Died on file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2003-2004, 5th Special Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 12/03/03 - Introduced Current pdf December 03, 2003
- SCA2 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
Withdrawn from committee. Art. IV, Sec. 8(b), of Constitution dispensed with. Read second time. To third reading. Read third time. Refused adoption. (Ayes 0. Noes 34. Page 24.) Motion to reconsider made by Senator Brulte. Reconsideration granted.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Standing Committee on Banking and Finance R. and C.A.
Sponsors
- Brulte · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Brulte
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 33 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 34 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 85% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Ackerman | — | Nay |
| Alarcon | — | Nay |
| Alpert | — | Nay |
| Battin | — | Nay |
| Bowen | — | Nay |
| Brulte | — | Nay |
| Burton | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Dunn | — | Nay |
| Escutia | — | Nay |
| Figueroa | — | Nay |
| Kuehl | — | Nay |
| Machado | — | Nay |
| Margett | — | Nay |
| McClintock | — | Nay |
| Morrow | — | Nay |
| Oller | — | Nay |
| Ortiz | — | Nay |
| Perata | — | Nay |
| Scott | — | Nay |
| Sher | — | Nay |
| Soto | — | Nay |
| Speier | — | Nay |
| Vasconcellos | — | Nay |
| Vincent | — | Nay |
| Karnette | — | Not Voting |
| McPherson | — | Not Voting |
| Murray | — | Not Voting |
| Poochigian | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Nay |
| Johnson, Natasha | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SCA 2?
- SCA 2 is sponsored by Brulte.
- What is the current status of SCA 2?
- This bill died with 2003-2004, 5th Special Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCA 2?
- Track SCA 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCA 2
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCA 2
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →