Connecticut 2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 2 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 2 — AN ACT CONCERNING INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS AND NET NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES.

Last action — MOTION FAILED SF

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

34 added · 5 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill now includes specific definitions related to broadband Internet access service, such as "broadband Internet access service," "end user," and "edge provider." It establishes a framework for Internet service providers to register with the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, detail their network management practices, and adhere to net neutrality principles, which include not blocking lawful content or engaging in paid prioritization. Importantly, the authority is given the power to handle complaints and enforce these provisions through a contested case process, potentially leading to civil penalties for noncompliance. This structure aims to ensure transparency and fairness in the services provided to users.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly   Proposed Bill No.
General Assembly   Committee Bill No.
2   February Session, 2018   LCO No.
2 February Session, 2018   LCO No.
390   *00390* Referred to Committee on ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY   Introduced by:
1844   *01844SB00002ET_* Referred to Committee on ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY   Introduced by:
  SEN.
  (ET)   AN ACT CONCERNING INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS AND NET NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES.
DUFF, 25th Dist.
  AN ACT CONCERNING INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS AND NET NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES.
That the general statutes be amended to require Internet service providers operating in the state to register with the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority and pay an annual registration fee, to require the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority to apply net neutrality principles to Internet service providers in Connecticut and to require a civil penalty be imposed by the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority for failure of an Internet service provider to comply with such principles where each day in violation is a separate offense.
Section 1.
Statement of Purpose:
(NEW) (Effective January 1, 2019) (a) As used in this section:
(1) "Broadband Internet access service" means a mass-market retail service by wire or radio that provides the capability to transmit data to and receive data from all or substantially all Internet endpoints, including any capability that is incidental to and enables the operation of the service, but excluding dial-up Internet access service;
(2) "Content, applications and services" means all traffic transmitted to or from end users of a broadband Internet access service;
(3) "Edge provider" means any person or entity that provides (A) any content, application or service over the Internet, or (B) a device used for accessing any content, application or service over the Internet;
(4) "End user" means any person or entity that uses a broadband Internet access service;
(5) "Fixed broadband Internet access service" means a broadband Internet access service that services end users primarily at fixed endpoints using stationary equipment, including fixed wireless services, fixed unlicensed wireless services and fixed satellite services;
(6) "Mobile broadband Internet access service" means a broadband Internet access service that serves end users primarily using mobile stations;
(7) "Net neutrality principles" means the provisions described in subsections (d) to (g), inclusive, of this section;
(8) "Paid prioritization" means the management of a broadband Internet access service provider's network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation or other forms of preferential traffic management either (A) in exchange for monetary or other consideration from a third party, or (B) to benefit an affiliated entity;
(9) "Authority" means the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority;
and (10) "Reasonable network management" means a network management practice that has a primarily technical network management justification, but does not include other business practices, provided a network management practice is reasonable if it is primarily used for and tailored to achieving a legitimate network management purpose, as determined by the authority, taking into account the particular network architecture and technology of the broadband Internet access service.
(b) A person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services within the state shall register with the authority, in a manner prescribed by the authority.
Beginning with January 1, 2019, and on or before each January first thereafter, each registered person or entity shall pay an annual registration fee to the authority in the amount of five thousand dollars.
(c) A person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services within the state shall publicly disclose accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance and commercial terms of its broadband Internet access services sufficient, as determined by the authority, for end users of such services to fully and accurately ascertain if the service is in compliance with this section.
(d) A person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services within the state shall not block lawful content, applications, services, as determined by the authority, or nonharmful devices, as determined by the authority, subject to reasonable network management.
(e) A person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services within the state shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application or service, or use of a nonharmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
(f) A person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services within the state shall not engage in paid prioritization.
(g) Any person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services within the state shall not interfere with or disadvantage (1) end users' ability to select, access and use broadband Internet access service or lawful Internet content, applications or services, or devices of such end users' choice, or (2) edge providers' ability to make lawful content, applications, services or devices available to end users, provided such person or entity may engage in reasonable network management.
(h) The authority shall receive and record complaints of any end user of broadband Internet access service within the state.
Upon receipt of such complaints, the authority may, in its discretion, review the performance of a person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access service.
The authority, upon a finding that any such person or entity failed to comply with the net neutrality principles described in this section, shall make orders, after a hearing that is conducted as a contested case in accordance with chapter 54 of the general statutes, to enforce the provisions of this section and may levy civil penalties against such person or entity, pursuant to section 16-41 of the general statutes, for noncompliance.
(i) Nothing in this section shall be considered to supersede or limit any obligation or authorization a person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services may have to address the needs of emergency communications, law enforcement, public safety or national security authorities, consistent with or as permitted by applicable law.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit reasonable efforts by a person or entity engaged in the provision of fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services to address copyright infringement or other unlawful activity.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 January 1, 2019 New section Statement of Purpose:
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] Co-Sponsors:
SEN.
DUFF, 25th Dist.;
REP.
ORANGE, 48th Dist.
REP.
GENTILE, 104th Dist.;
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
REP.
CONLEY, 40th Dist.
REP.
SLAP, 19th Dist.;
SEN.
BYE, 5th Dist.
REP.
WINKLER, 56th Dist.
S.B.
View plain text versions (2)
  • R01 html
  • R00 Current html

Action History

  1. MOTION FAILED SF

  2. PUBLIC HEARING 0308

  3. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Energy and Technology

  4. DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE

  5. Vote to Draft

  6. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Energy and Technology

Sponsors

  • James M. Albis · Primary
  • Michael D'Agostino · Primary
  • Josh Elliott · Primary
  • Beth Bye · Primary
  • John K. Hampton · Primary
  • Patricia A. Dillon · Primary
  • Ezequiel Santiago · Primary
  • Michael Winkler · Primary
  • Linda A. Orange · Primary
  • Linda M. Gentile · Primary
  • Christine Conley · Primary
  • Bob Duff · Primary
  • Marilyn Moore · Primary
  • Heather S. Somers · Primary
  • Derek Slap · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

15 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 172 not signed on

Sponsors (15)

  • Albis, James M.
  • D'Agostino, Michael
  • Elliott, Josh
  • Bye, Beth
  • Hampton, John K.
  • Dillon, Patricia A.
  • Santiago, Ezequiel
  • Winkler, Michael
  • Orange, Linda A.
  • Gentile, Linda M.
  • Conley, Christine
  • Bob Duff Democratic
  • Marilyn Moore
  • Heather S. Somers Republican
  • Derek Slap Democratic

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (172)

172 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 172 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 2?
SB 2 is sponsored by Albis, James M., D'Agostino, Michael, Elliott, Josh, Bye, Beth, Hampton, John K., Dillon, Patricia A., Santiago, Ezequiel, Winkler, Michael, Orange, Linda A., Gentile, Linda M., Conley, Christine, Bob Duff (Democratic), Marilyn Moore, Heather S. Somers (Republican), and Derek Slap (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 2?
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 2?
Track SB 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →