AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO SALES OF REAL ESTATE MADE BY A SHERIFF.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 159 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 159.
You're tracking HB 159
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 159 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO SALES OF REAL ESTATE MADE BY A SHERIFF.
Last action — Signed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 27, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
4 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
This act modifies the locations at which sheriff’s sales may be conducted to provide the sheriffs with needed flexibility and to modernize the sheriff’s sale process. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has revealed substantial inflexibility in 10 Del. C. § 4974 as currently adopted, forcing the sheriff of each of the three counties to either hold sheriff’s sales outdoors, find non-governmental venues in which to hold sheriff’s sales or cancel sheriff’s sales. Additionally, the New Castle County Sheriff is considering using an online auction process to conduct sheriff’s sales, as other counties throughout the United States have done, but § 4974 as currently adopted does not permit online sheriff’s sales. Finally, this act removes uncertainty regarding the meaning of the term “public building” as currently used in § 4974 by adopting a definition that is consistent with the Delaware Supreme Court’s definition of that term in Moore v. Wilmington Housing Authority, 619 A.2d 1166, 1174-75 (Del. 1993).
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
38 added · 16 removed38 line(s) added, 16 removed.
Mitchell HOUSE& OFRep. REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
1Dorsey TOWalker HOUSE& BILLSen. NO.
159Poore AMEND& HouseSen. Bill No.
159Hansen byRep. deleting line 9 and 10 in their entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
“(2)Briggs atKing; At the courthouse for the county in which the premises are situated.
situated,Sens. or in Sussex County, at the Sussex County Sheriff’s officer or.
InEnnis, KentGay, County,Sturgeon salesHOUSE mayOF alsoREPRESENTATIVES be151st conductedGENERAL inASSEMBLY anyHOUSE buildingBILL inNO. which the Sheriff’s Office is located.” FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
159 byAN deletingACT lineTO 12AMEND andTITLE 1310 inOF theirTHE entiretyDELAWARE andCODE insertingRELATING inTO lieuSALES thereofOF theREAL following:ESTATE MADE BY A SHERIFF.
“(4)BE atIT AtENACTED anyBY publicTHE buildingGENERAL orASSEMBLY outdoorsOF onTHE anySTATE publicOF propertyDELAWARE: located in the county seat where the premises are situated.” FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
159Section by1. deleting lines 14 through 17 in their entirety.
SYNOPSISAmend This§ amendment4974, removesTitle the10 authorizationof tothe holdDelaware salesCode ofby realmaking estatedeletions duringas theshown executionby processstrike through anand onlineinsertions auctionas process.shown by underline as follows:
This(a) amendmentAs alsoused makesin technicalthis corrections.section, “public building” and “public property” mean a building or property that is open to members of the public who wish to attend a sheriff’s sale.
“Public building” or “public property” includes a building or property not owned by the government or a governmental entity.
(b) All sales of real estate, made by a sheriff by virtue of execution process, shall be made at any one of the following locations:
(1) on On the premises to be sold, or sold.
(2) at At the courthouse for the county in which the premises are situated.
situated, or in Sussex County, at the Sussex County Sheriff’s office or (3) At the Sheriff’s Office or the building in which the Sheriff’s Office is located.
(4) at At any public building or outdoors on any public property located in the county seat of the county where the premises are situated.
(5) Through an online auction process that is available to the public and accommodates parties who cannot bid electronically.
(6) Through any public sale process authorized by a court order.
In Kent County, sales may also be conducted in any building in which the Sheriff’s Office is located.
(c) Unless otherwise directed by court order, the sheriff conducting a sale retains exclusive authority to determine the location and means for the sale of real property by virtue of execution as permitted by subsection (b) of this section.
SYNOPSIS This act modifies the locations at which sheriff’s sales may be conducted to provide the sheriffs with needed flexibility and to modernize the sheriff’s sale process.The recent COVID-19 pandemic has revealed substantial inflexibility in 10 Del.
C.
§ 4974 as currently adopted, forcing the sheriff of each of the three counties to either hold sheriff’s sales outdoors, find non-governmental venues in which to hold sheriff’s sales or cancel sheriff’s sales.
MAW Page 1 of 12 Released:
06/14/202104/27/2021 12:2701:19 PM 2141510343Additionally, the New Castle County Sheriff is considering using an online auction process to conduct sheriff’s sales, as other counties throughout the United States have done, but § 4974 as currently adopted does not permit online sheriff’s sales.
Finally, this act removes uncertainty regarding the meaning of the term “public building” as currently used in § 4974 by adopting a definition that is consistent with the Delaware Supreme Court’s definition of that term in Moore v.
Wilmington Housing Authority, 619 A.2d 1166, 1174-75 (Del.
1993).
HD :
NSW :
MAW Page 2 of 2 Released:
04/27/2021 01:19 PM 2141510145
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 5 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
-
Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 159 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 159 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 2 Favorable, 6 On Its Merits
-
Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
Sponsors
- Nicole Poore · Primary
- Stephanie L. Hansen · Primary
- Laura V. Sturgeon · Cosponsor
- Kyle Evans Gay · Cosponsor
- Ruth Briggs King · Cosponsor
- Bruce C. Ennis · Cosponsor
- Sherry Dorsey Walker · Primary
- John L. Mitchell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 54 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Nicole Poore Democratic
- Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic
- Sherry Dorsey Walker
- John L. Mitchell
Co-sponsors (4)
Not signed on (54)
54 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 54 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce C. Ennis | — | Yea |
| Colin Bonini | — | Yea |
| Ernesto B Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kyle Evans Gay | — | Yea |
| Sarah McBride | — | Yea |
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Yea |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 159 do?
- This act modifies the locations at which sheriff’s sales may be conducted to provide the sheriffs with needed flexibility and to modernize the sheriff’s sale process. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has revealed substantial inflexibility in 10 Del. C. § 4974 as currently adopted, forcing the sheriff of each of the three counties to either hold sheriff’s sales outdoors, find non-governmental venues in which to hold sheriff’s sales or cancel sheriff’s sales. Additionally, the New Castle County Sheriff is considering using an online auction process to conduct sheriff’s sales, as other counties throughout the United States have done, but § 4974 as currently adopted does not permit online sheriff’s sales. Finally, this act removes uncertainty regarding the meaning of the term “public building” as currently used in § 4974 by adopting a definition that is consistent with the Delaware Supreme Court’s definition of that term in Moore v. Wilmington Housing Authority, 619 A.2d 1166, 1174-75 (Del. 1993).
- Who sponsors HB 159?
- HB 159 is sponsored by Nicole Poore (Democratic), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), Kyle Evans Gay, Ruth Briggs King, Bruce C. Ennis, Sherry Dorsey Walker, and John L. Mitchell.
- What is the current status of HB 159?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 27, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 159?
- Track HB 159 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 159
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 159
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →