Delaware 151st General Assembly (2021-2022) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 18 D · 6 R cosponsors

HB 230 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO JUDICIAL PRIVACY.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 03, 2021. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 30 sponsors

    7 primary, 23 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (18 D · 6 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Recent high-profile attacks on judges and their families are a constant reminder to those that choose public service that they may be doing so at the risk of their and their loved ones’ lives. The death of U.S. District Court Judge Esther Salas’ son, Daniel Anderl, in New Jersey is tragically just one example – numerous instances of threatening and harassing behavior targeted at judicial officers rarely make prime time news but nonetheless impacts them. The rise and use of social media and online access to information has made it more difficult for judicial officers to maintain their privacy. This Act would allow judicial officers to make a written request that their personal information not be published and remain confidential. The Act takes effect 1 year after its enactment to allow for implementation.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

141 added · 22 removed

141 line(s) added, 22 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Griffith HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
Griffith & Rep.
1 TO HOUSE BILL NO.
Bush & Rep.
230 AMEND House Bill No.
Heffernan & Rep.
230 at line 38 by striking “(5)” as it appears thereon and substituting in lieu thereof “(6)” and redesignating accordingly.
Dorsey Walker & Sen.
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
Gay & Sen.
230 by striking lines 67 through 69 in their entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following:
Brown & Sen.
“(1) After a person has received a written request from a judicial officer to protect the personal information of the judicial officer or their family, that person must remove the personal information from public display withing 72 hours or, in the case of a printed directory, no later than the next update to the directory.”.
Hansen Reps.
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
Baumbach, Brady, Chukwuocha, K.
230 by inserting after line 86 and before line 87 the following:
Johnson, Lynn, Minor-Brown, Osienski, D.
“(d) Affirmative defense.
Short, K.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or enlarge the protections that 47 U.S.C § 230 confers on an interactive computer service for content provided by another information content provider, as those terms are defined in 47 U.S.C.
Williams;
§ 230.”.
Sens.
SYNOPSIS This amendment does all of the following:
Hocker, Lawson, Lockman, Lopez, Mantzavinos, S.
1.
McBride, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Poore, Richardson, Sokola, Townsend, Walsh, Wilson HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO.
Corrects a technical error.
230 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO JUDICIAL PRIVACY.
2.
WHEREAS, Delaware judicial officers perform the important and essential function of interpreting our Delaware Constitution, statutes, and laws and administering justice in a fair and impartial manner;
Clarifies that where personal information is contained in a printed directory, the person must remove it (following a request) before the next update, rather than within 3 day.
and WHEREAS, when carrying out their public duties, judicial officers must be able to act without fear of personal reprisal from individuals affected by the decisions they make;
3.
and WHEREAS, in recent years, as a result of the rise in the use of social media and online access to information, judicial officers across the country have been exposed to an increasing number of personal threats in connection to their public duties;
Clarifies that this Act is not meant to limit or enlarge protections in federal law relating to third-party content providers on an interactive computer service.
and WHEREAS, on Sunday July 19, 2020, an assailant went to the home of Esther Salas, a judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, impersonated a package delivery driver, opened fire upon arrival, and killed Daniel Anderl, the 20-year-old son of Judge Salas, and seriously wounding Mark Anderl, her husband;
and WHEREAS, in the lessons learned in the aftermath of this recent tragedy and in response to the continuous rise of threats against judicial officers, there is an immediate need for judicial officers to protect the privacy of their personal information and the personal information of their family members.
NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1.
Amend Chapter 19, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
Subchapter I-A.
Judicial Privacy.
§ 1921.
Definitions.
As used in this subchapter:
MAW Page 1 of 1 Released:
MAW Page 1 of 5 Released:
06/15/2021 11:51 AM 2141510344
06/02/2021 06:43 PM (1) “Government agency” includes all agencies, authorities, boards, commissioner, departments, institutions, offices, and any other bodies of the State created by the constitution or statute, whether in the executive, judicial, or legislative branch;
all units and corporate outgrowths created by executive order of the Governor or any constitutional officer, by the Supreme Court, or by resolution of the General Assembly;
and agencies, authorities, boards, commissions, departments, institutions, offices, and any other bodies politic and corporate of a unit of local government, or school district.
(2) “Home address” includes a judicial officer’s permanent residence and any secondary residence affirmatively identified by the judicial officer, but does not include a judicial officer’s work address.
(3) “Family” means as defined in § 901 of this title.
(4) “Judicial officer” includes any active, formerly active, or retired:
a.
Chief Justice or Justice of the Supreme Court.
b.
Chancellor, Vice Chancellor or Master of the Court of Chancery.
Show all 119 changed rows (79 more)
Previous
Latest
c.
President Judge, Judge or Commissioner of the Superior Court.
d.
Chief Judge, Judge or Commissioner of the Court of Common Pleas.
e.
Chief Judge, Judge or Commissioner of the Family Court.
f.
Chief Magistrate or Justice of the Peace of the Justice of the Peace Court.
(5) “Person” means as defined in § 302 of Title 1.
(5) “Personal information” means a home address, home telephone number, mobile telephone number, direct telephone number to a judicial officer’s private chambers, personal e-mail address, social security number, federal tax identification number, checking and savings account numbers, credit or debit card numbers, birth or marital records, property tax records, and identity of children under the age of 18.
(6) “Publicly available content” means any written, printed, or electronic document or record that provides information or that serves as a document or record maintained, controlled, or in the possession of a government agency that may be obtained by any person, from the Internet, from the government agency upon request either free of charge or for a fee, or in response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
(7) “Publicly post” or “publicly display” means to communicate to another or otherwise make available to the general public.
(8) “Written request” means written notice signed by a judicial officer or a representative of the judicial officer’s employer requesting a government agency or person to refrain from posting or displaying publicly available content that includes the personal information of the judicial officer or of their family.
HD :
KL :
MAW Page 2 of 5 Released:
06/02/2021 06:43 PM § 1922.
Public display or public posting of a judicial officer’s personal information by government agencies.
Government agencies may not publicly post or publicly display content that includes the personal information of the judicial officer or their family if the judicial officer has made a written request under § 1924 of this subchapter that the government agency not disclose such personal information.
After a government agency has received a written request, that agency shall remove the personal information from publicly available content within 72 hours.
After the government agency has removed the judicial officer’s personal information from publicly available content, the agency shall not publicly post, display or otherwise release the information unless the government agency has received the judicial officer’s consent to make the personal information available to the public.
§ 1923.
Public display or public posting of a judicial officer’s personal information by persons.
(a) Prohibited Conduct.
(1) No person shall publicly post or publicly display the personal information of a judicial officer or their family if the judicial officer has made a written request under § 1924 of this subchapter of that person not to disclose such personal information.
(2) No person shall share, solicit, sell, or trade the personal information of a judicial officer or their family with the intent to pose an imminent and serious threat to the health and safety of the judicial officer or their family.
(b) Required Conduct.
(1) After a person has received a written request from a judicial officer to protect the personal information of the judicial officer of their family, that person must remove the personal information from public display within 72 hours.
(2) After a person has received a written request from a judicial officer, that person shall ensure that the judicial officer’s personal information is not publicly displayed, including on any website or subsidiary website controlled by that person.
(3) After receiving a judicial officer’s written request, a person may not transfer the judicial officer’s personal information to any other person through any medium.
(c) Remedies.
(1) Equitable Relief.
A judicial officer or family member whose personal information is made public as a result of a violation of this Act may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief in any court of competent jurisdiction.
If the court grants injunctive or declaratory relief, the person responsible for the violation shall be required to pay the judicial officer’s costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.
(2) Private Right of Action.
A judicial officer or family member who is aggrieved by a violation of this HD :
KL :
MAW Page 3 of 5 Released:
06/02/2021 06:43 PM 81 subsection may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction.
A prevailing plaintiff in such action shall be awarded damages in an amount:
(i) not greater than 3 times the actual damages to the plaintiff;
and (ii) not less than $10,000.
(3) Criminal penalties.
Public posting or display of a judicial officer’s personal information after receipt of a written request may result in criminal penalties under Title 11 where the statutory elements of a crime defined under that title are met.
§ 1924.
Procedure for completing a written request.
(a) Requirement that a judicial officer make a written request.
No government agency or person shall be found to have violated any provision of this Act if the judicial officer has not submitted a written request calling for the protection of the judicial officer’s personal information.
(b) Written request procedure.
A written request shall be valid if one of the following occurs:
(1) The judicial officer sends a written request directly to a government agency or person.
(2) The Administrative Office of the Courts develops a policy and procedure for a judicial officer to file the written request with the Administrative Office to notify government agencies, and a judicial officer sends a written request to the Administrative Office of the Courts.
(c) In each quarter of a calendar year, the Administrative Office of the Courts shall provide a list of all judicial officers who have submitted a written request to it, to the appropriate officer with ultimate supervisory authority for a government agency.
The officer shall promptly provide a copy of the list to all government agencies under the officer’s supervision.
Receipt of the written request list compiled by the Administrative Office of the Courts by a government agency shall constitute a written request to that agency for the purposes of this Act.
(d) A representative from the judicial officer may submit a written request on the judicial officer’s behalf, provided that the judicial officer gives written consent to the representative and provided that the representative agrees to furnish a copy of that consent when a written request is made.
The representative shall submit the written request as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(e) Information to be included in the written request.
(1) A judicial officer’s written request shall specify what personal information shall be maintained private.
(2) If a judicial officer wishes to identify a secondary residence as a home address as that term is defined in this Act, the designation shall be made in the written request.
(3) A judicial officer shall disclose the identity of the judicial officer’s family and indicate that the personal information of these family members shall also be excluded to the extent that it could reasonably be expected to reveal HD :
KL :
MAW Page 4 of 5 Released:
06/02/2021 06:43 PM the personal information of the judicial officer.
(f) Duration of the written request.
A judicial officer’s written request is valid until the judicial officer provides the government agency, person, business, or association with written permission to release the private information.
A judicial officer’s written request expires on death.
Section 2.
This Act takes effect 1 year after its enactment into law.
SYNOPSIS Recent high-profile attacks on judges and their families are a constant reminder to those that choose public service that they may be doing so at the risk of their and their loved ones’ lives.
The death of U.S.
District Court Judge Esther Salas’ son, Daniel Anderl, in New Jersey is tragically just one example – numerous instances of threatening and harassing behavior targeted at judicial officers rarely make prime time news but nonetheless impacts them.
The rise and use of social media and online access to information has made it more difficult for judicial officers to maintain their privacy.
This Act would allow judicial officers to make a written request that their personal information not be published and remain confidential.
The Act takes effect 1 year after its enactment to allow for implementation.
HD :
KL :
MAW Page 5 of 5 Released:
06/02/2021 06:43 PM 2141510283
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 3 Favorable, 2 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

  5. Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT

  6. Amendment HA 1 to HB 230 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

  7. Amendment HA 1 to HB 230 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  8. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 2 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits

  9. Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 23 co-sponsors · 32 not signed on

Sponsors (7)

Co-sponsors (23)

Not signed on (32)

32 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 32 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 11000
Unaffiliated 5000
Republican 5000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Colin Bonini — Yea
Ernesto B Lopez — Yea
Kyle Evans Gay — Yea
Sarah McBride — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Democratic 15001
Republican 12000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
Gerald L. Brady — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Yea
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stephen Smyk — Yea
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Not Voting
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 230 do?
Recent high-profile attacks on judges and their families are a constant reminder to those that choose public service that they may be doing so at the risk of their and their loved ones’ lives. The death of U.S. District Court Judge Esther Salas’ son, Daniel Anderl, in New Jersey is tragically just one example – numerous instances of threatening and harassing behavior targeted at judicial officers rarely make prime time news but nonetheless impacts them. The rise and use of social media and online access to information has made it more difficult for judicial officers to maintain their privacy. This Act would allow judicial officers to make a written request that their personal information not be published and remain confidential. The Act takes effect 1 year after its enactment to allow for implementation.
Who sponsors HB 230?
HB 230 is sponsored by Kyle Evans Gay, Krista Griffith (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), William Bush (Democratic), Debra Heffernan (Democratic), Gerald W. Hocker (Republican), Dave G. Lawson (Republican), S. Elizabeth Lockman (Democratic), Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Trey Paradee (Democratic), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), Nicole Poore (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha (Democratic), Kendra Johnson (Democratic), Sean M. Lynn (Democratic), Melissa Minor-Brown (Democratic), Edward S. Osienski (Democratic), Daniel B. Short (Republican), Kimberly Williams (Democratic), Gerald L. Brady, Paul S. Baumbach, Sarah McBride, Ernesto B Lopez, and Sherry Dorsey Walker.
What is the current status of HB 230?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 03, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 230?
Track HB 230 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 230

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 230

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →