SB 239 — AN ACT CONCERNING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM MONITORING OF CONVICTED PERSONS AWAITING SENTENCING FOR AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT.
Last action — FILE NO. 512
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
9 added · 9 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of SB 239 allows the court to require individuals subject to electronic monitoring to pay a fee directly to the service provider for these services. If the individual is found to be indigent and unable to pay, the court must waive the costs. Additionally, it outlines that any contracts for electronic monitoring services must state that the total cost will not exceed five dollars per day, which will adjust annually for inflation. This change clarifies the financial obligations related to electronic monitoring and ensures that costs are manageable for those with limited financial resources.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
239 February Session, 2018 LCO*_____SB00239JUD___040418____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM MONITORING OF CONVICTED PERSONS AWAITING SENTENCING FOR AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT.
1336 *01336_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM MONITORING OF CONVICTED PERSONS AWAITING SENTENCING FOR AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT.
(c) The court may require that the person subject to electronic monitoring pursuant to subsection (b) of this section pay directly to the electronic monitoring service provider a fee for the cost of such electronic monitoring services.
If the court finds that the person subject to electronic monitoring is indigent and unable to pay the costs of electronic monitoring services, the court shall waive such costs.
The court may contract for such electronic monitoring services pursuant to subsection (e) of section 54-64a, as amended by this act.
Sec.
2.
Subsection (e) of section 54-64a of the 2018 supplement to the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2018):
(e) The court may require that the person subject to electronic monitoring pursuant to subsection (c) of this section pay directly to the electronic monitoring service provider a fee for the cost of such electronic monitoring services.
If the court finds that the person subject to electronic monitoring is indigent and unable to pay the costs of electronic monitoring services, the court shall waive such costs.
Any contract entered into by the Judicial Branch and [the electronic monitoring service provider] a provider of electronic monitoring services, which services may include, but need not be limited to, those electronic monitoring services required pursuant to section 54-63f, as amended by this act, shall include a provision stating that the total cost for electronic monitoring services shall not exceed five dollars per day.
Such amount shall be indexed annually to reflect the rate of inflation.
Section 1 October 1, 2018 54-63f StatementSec. of Purpose:
To2 requireOctober any1, person2018 awaiting54-64a(e) sentencingJUD forJoint aggravatedFavorable sexualSubst. assault to be monitored by a global positioning system device.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
FILE NO. 512
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 316
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/16/18
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0309
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Robin Green · Primary
- Art Linares · Primary
- Jesse MacLachlan · Primary
- Tom Delnicki · Primary
- Anne Dauphinais · Primary
- Stephen G. Harding · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on
Sponsors (6)
- Green, Robin
- Linares, Art
- MacLachlan, Jesse
- Delnicki, Tom
- Dauphinais, Anne
- Stephen G. Harding Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (181)
181 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 181 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 239?
- SB 239 is sponsored by Green, Robin, Linares, Art, MacLachlan, Jesse, Delnicki, Tom, Dauphinais, Anne, and Stephen G. Harding (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 239?
- This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 239?
- Track SB 239 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 239
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 239
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →