SB 399 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE UNIFORM PROTECTED SERIES ACT.
Last action — FILE NO. 520
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
18 added · 19 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill SB 399 introduced revisions that clarify specifics regarding the issuance of certificates for limited liability companies and their protected series. It now states that a certificate must confirm that the necessary requirements are met, and it specifies situations under which failure to observe formalities does not invalidate certain limitations. Additionally, definitions related to claims by residents or entities doing business in the state have been refined. These changes provide clearer guidelines for both the operation of limited liability companies and the jurisdictional processes involving foreign entities.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
399 February Session, 2018 LCO*_____SB00399JUD___032918____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING THE UNIFORM PROTECTED SERIES ACT.
365 *00365_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING THE UNIFORM PROTECTED SERIES ACT.
(B) Relations amongbetween the protected series and:
(b) A certificate issued under subsection (a) of this section shall state:
(B) That the requirements of subsection (a) of this section are met;
(b) The failure of a limited liability company or a protected series to observe a formality relating to the exercise of its powers or management of its activities and affairs is not a ground to disregard a limitation in subsection (a) of section 20 of this actact, but may be a ground to disregard a limitation in subsection (b) of section 20 of this act.
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2018) (a) InAs used in this section:
(2) The claimant is a resident of this state or doing business or registered to do business in this state, or the claim under section 23 of this actsection is to enforce a judgment, or to seek a prejudgment remedy, pertaining to a liability arising under law of this state other than sections 1 to 42, inclusive, of this act or an act or omission in this state;
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2018) (1)As "Afterused ain merger"this orsection "afterand thesections merger"28 meansto when34, ainclusive, merger under section 30 of this actact: becomes effective and afterwards.
(1) "After a merger" or "after the merger" means when a merger under section 30 of this act becomes effective and afterwards.
(1)(i) Is or is proposed to be in a record;
and (2)(ii) Is necessary or appropriate to state the rights and obligations of the person as a member of the surviving company.
(c) The name of a foreign protected series applying for registration or registered to do business in this state shall comply with section 10 of this act and may do so using an alternate name adopted pursuant to section 34-274e34-275e of the general statutes, if the name complies with section 10 of this act.
(b) If a foreign series limited liability company or foreign protected series challenges the personal jurisdiction of the tribunal, the requirement that the foreign company or foreign protected series make a disclosure under subsection (a) of this section is tolled until the tribunal determines whether it has personal jurisdiction.
45 October 1, 2018 34-275 Statement of Purpose:Legislative Commissioners:
ToIn adoptSections the23(e)(2), Uniform27 Protectedand Series37(c), Act.section references were corrected or added for accuracy.
[ProposedJUD deletionsJoint areFavorable enclosedSubst. in brackets.
Proposed-LCO additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
FILE NO. 520
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 325
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/16/18
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0309
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Steven J. Stafstrom · Primary
- Stephanie E. Cummings · Primary
- Rob Sampson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Stafstrom, Steven J.
- Cummings, Stephanie E.
- Rob Sampson Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (184)
184 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 184 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 399?
- SB 399 is sponsored by Stafstrom, Steven J., Cummings, Stephanie E., and Rob Sampson (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 399?
- This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 399?
- Track SB 399 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 399
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 399
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →