Delaware 151st General Assembly (2021-2022) Status: In Committee 2 R cosponsors

HB 231 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO RELEASE OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF CRIMES.

Last action — Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 151st General Assembly (2021-2022). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

This bill requires transparency in the use of risk assessment instruments and requires empirical data that the instrument does not increase or magnify bias against any protected class.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

5 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill mandates transparency and bias testing for risk assessment instruments used in pretrial release decisions.

  • § 2102

    “Risk Assessment Instrument” is is a pretrial process that creates or scores particular factors in order to estimate a defendant’s level of risk to fail to appear in court, risk to commit a new crime, likelihood or predicted severity of future violence against the alleged victim of domestic or intimate partner violence, risk posed to the community, or any other measurement of pretrial success in order to make recommendations to bail or conditions of release based on such risk whether made on an individualized basis or based on a grid or schedule. → “Risk Assessment Instrument” is a pretrial process that creates or scores particular factors in order to estimate a defendant’s level of risk to fail to appear in court, risk to commit a new crime, likelihood or predicted severity of future violence against the alleged victim of domestic or intimate partner violence, risk posed to the community, or any other measurement of pretrial success in order to make recommendations to bail or conditions of release based on such risk whether made on an individualized basis or based on a grid or schedule.

    Clarifies the definition of a 'Risk Assessment Instrument' by correcting a typographical error.

  • § 2104 (2)

    (a) All documents, data, records, and information used by the builder to build or validate the risk assessment instrument and ongoing documents, data, records, and written policies outlining the usage and validation of the risk assessment instrument shall be open to public inspection, auditing, and testing;

    Requires that all documentation related to the creation and validation of risk assessment instruments be publicly accessible.

  • § 2104 (2)

    (b) A party to a criminal case wherein a court has considered, or an expert witness has relied upon, a risk assessment instrument shall be entitled to review all calculations and data used to calculate the defendant’s own risk score;

    Ensures defendants can review the calculations used in their risk assessments.

  • § 2104 (2)

    (c) No builder or user of a risk assessment instrument may assert trade secret or other intellectual property protections in order to quash discovery of the materials described in paragraph (a) of this subsection in a criminal or civil case;

    Prevents claim of trade secrets to block access to risk assessment data in legal cases.

  • § 2104 (2)

    (d) No risk assessment instrument shall be used, until testing for bias has been shown not to increase or magnify bias against a person in a protected class or classes as defined by an empirically recognized standard for testing for such bias, including but not limited to the error rate balance test.

    Mandates that risk assessment instruments must undergo bias testing before use.

Action History

  1. Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 57 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (57)

57 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 57 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 231 do?
This bill requires transparency in the use of risk assessment instruments and requires empirical data that the instrument does not increase or magnify bias against any protected class.
Who sponsors HB 231?
HB 231 is sponsored by David L. Wilson (Republican), Daniel B. Short (Republican), Ruth Briggs King, Colin Bonini, and Stephen Smyk.
What is the current status of HB 231?
This bill died with 151st General Assembly (2021-2022). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 231?
Track HB 231 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 231

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 231

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →