SB 89 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 21 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR SIZE AND WEIGHT OF VEHICLES AND LOADS.
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 18, 2021. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
10 sponsors
5 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
This Act makes the following changes related to traffic control devices erected on order of the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (“Secretary”) limiting the size and weight of vehicles and loads permitted on a specific highway: (1) Provides definitions of terms used on traffic control devices that limit the size or weight of vehicles or prohibit the operation of trucks or other commercial vehicles on the highway, including terms that provide exceptions to posted prohibitions, including “local service” and “residential service”. (2) Requires the Secretary, and a municipality exercising its authority under § 134(e) of Title 17 (regarding prohibiting the operation of trucks or other commercial vehicles or imposing limits as to the weight of trucks or other commercial vehicles on designated highways), to submit an order issued under this Act to the Registrar of Regulations for publication in the Register of Regulations and publish the order on the Department’s website. (3) Clarifies that violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary is a specific offense. (4) Increases the monetary penalty for a violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary over the existing penalty in § 4508 of Title 21. (5) Makes a subsequent violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary a moving violation, which results in the Department assessing points on an individual’s license based on the violation.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
91 added · 13 removed91 line(s) added, 13 removed.
Mantzavinos DELAWARE& STATESen. SENATE 151st GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
1Walsh TO& SENATERep. BILL NO.
89K. AMEND Senate Bill No.
89Williams on& lineRep. 27 by inserting "or height " after "weight" and before "of" therein.
FURTHERBrady AMEND& SenateRep. Bill No.
89Mitchell onSens. line 29 by deleting "or without " after "with" and before "exceptions" therein.
SYNOPSISEnnis, DueLopez, toSokola, theTownsend; nature of height and weight restrictions, exceptions for local service or residential service are not permitted.
Currently,Rep. height restrictions are imposed by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation ("Secretary") under the general authority to restrict commercial vehicle traffic on certain roads.
ThisRamone AmendmentDELAWARE createsSTATE special,SENATE separate151st authorityGENERAL forASSEMBLY theSENATE SecretaryBILL toNO. impose height restrictions.
This89 AmendmentAN alsoACT requiresTO exceptionsAMEND forTITLE local21 serviceOF orTHE residentialDELAWARE serviceCODE onRELATING roadsTO whereTRAFFIC commercialCONTROL vehiclesDEVICES areFOR otherwiseSIZE prohibited.AND WEIGHT OF VEHICLES AND LOADS.
WHEREAS, certain roads in this State are intended and designed for truck traffic;
and WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation and municipalities are authorized to erect traffic control devices to limit truck traffic to roads in this State that are intended and designed for truck traffic;
and WHEREAS, there is a need to clarify and strengthen State law to ensure truck traffic is directed onto roads in this State that are intended and designed for truck traffic.
NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE (Two-thirds of all members elected to each house thereof concurring therein):
Section 1.
Amend § 4505, Title 21 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 4505.
Traffic control devices.
(a) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Commercial vehicle” means as defined under § 101 of this title and includes a truck.
(2) “Local service” means an origin, destination, or service located directly on a restricted roadway segment or at a location that can only be accessed by a restricted roadway segment.
(3) “Residential service” means an origin, destination, or service located at a building that is used as a residence.
(4) “Service” means a stop at any of the following:
a.
A point where freight originates, terminates, or is handled.
b.
A facility for food, fuel, repair, or rest.
c.
A location where commercial motor carriers maintain an operating facility.
d.
A location where labor is performed.
LC :
MJC :
CM Page 1 of 3 Released:
03/18/2021 10:41 AM (b) The Secretary of Transportation the Department may implement this chapter by erection of traffic control devices and provided further that:
and §§ 134 and 141 of Title 17 by erecting traffic control devices.
(c) The Secretary of the Department may do all of the following:
(1) Traffic Order traffic control devices may be erected on any highway establishing the maximum permitted weight of any vehicle including load that may be driven thereover.on the highway.
(2) Traffic Order traffic control devices may be erected on any highway prohibiting the operation of trucks or other commercial vehicles thereover.on the highway, with or without exceptions for local service or residential service.
Show all 82 changed lines (42 more)
(d)(1) The Secretary of the Department shall submit an order issued under subsection (c) of this section to the Registrar of Regulations for publication in the Register of Regulations.
The Secretary shall also publish the order on the Department’s website with other similar orders.
(2) An incorporated municipality exercising its authority under § 134(e) of Title 17 shall submit notice of the municipality’s action to the Registrar of Regulations for publication in the Register of Regulations.
For a state- maintained highway, the notice must include a certification from the Department that the notice has been approved by the Department.
The Secretary shall publish the notice on the Department’s website with orders issued by the Department under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(e) It is unlawful for a person to drive or move or, being the owner, cause or knowingly permit to be driven or moved, a vehicle or combination of vehicles in violation of a traffic control device erected under subsection (c) of this section.
(f)(1) For purposes of this subsection:
a.
“First offense” means a person has not, before the date of this offense, previously been convicted of violating the traffic control device at the location of the offense.
b.
“Subsequent like offense” means a person has, before the date of this offense, been convicted of violating the traffic control device at the location of the offense.
(2) Section 4508 of this title does not apply to a violation of subsection (e) of this section.
(3) A violation of paragraph (c)(1) of this section is punishable as follows:
a.
For a first offense, by both of the following:
1.
A fine of not less than $250 nor more than $450 or by a term of imprisonment of not more than 30 days or both.
LC :
MJC :
CM Page 2 of 3 Released:
03/18/2021 10:41 AM 2.
A fine for all excess weight up to and including 5,000 pounds in the amount of 2.3 cents per pound and a fine for all excess weight over 5,000 pounds in the amount of 5.75 cents per pound or by a term of imprisonment not to exceed 30 days or both.
b.
For a subsequent like offense, by both of the following:
1.
A fine of not less than $500 nor more than $650 or by a term of imprisonment of not more than 60 days or both.
2.
A fine for all excess weight up to and including 5,000 pounds in the amount of 5.75 cents per pound and a fine for all excess weight over 5,000 pounds in the amount of 11.5 cents per pound or by a term of imprisonment not to exceed 60 days or both.
(4) A violation of paragraph (c)(2) this section is punishable as follows:
a.
For a first offense, by a fine of not less than $250 nor more than $450 or by a term of imprisonment of not more than 30 days or both.
b.
For a subsequent like offense, by a fine of not less than $450 nor more than $650 or by a term of imprisonment of not more than 60 days or both.
(5) A subsequent like offense under this subsection constitutes a moving violation.
SYNOPSIS This Act makes the following changes related to traffic control devices erected on order of the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (“Secretary”) limiting the size and weight of vehicles and loads permitted on a specific highway:
(1) Provides definitions of terms used on traffic control devices that limit the size or weight of vehicles or prohibit the operation of trucks or other commercial vehicles on the highway, including terms that provide exceptions to posted prohibitions, including “local service” and “residential service”.
(2) Requires the Secretary, and a municipality exercising its authority under § 134(e) of Title 17 (regarding prohibiting the operation of trucks or other commercial vehicles or imposing limits as to the weight of trucks or other commercial vehicles on designated highways), to submit an order issued under this Act to the Registrar of Regulations for publication in the Register of Regulations and publish the order on the Department’s website.
(3) Clarifies that violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary is a specific offense.
(4) Increases the monetary penalty for a violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary over the existing penalty in § 4508 of Title 21.
(5) Makes a subsequent violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary a moving violation, which results in the Department assessing points on an individual’s license based on the violation.
CM Page 13 of 13 Released:
03/30/202103/18/2021 09:5410:41 AM 48015100624801510047
Show all 82 changed rows (42 more)
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT
-
Suspension of Rules in House
-
Reported Out of Committee (Transportation/Land Use and Infrastructure) in House with 3 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Transportation/Land Use and Infrastructure Committee in House
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
-
Amendment SA 1 to SB 89 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
-
Amendment SA 1 to SB 89 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Reported Out of Committee (Transportation) in Senate with 2 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
-
Introduced and Assigned to Transportation Committee in Senate
Sponsors
- Spiros Mantzavinos · Primary
- John "Jack" Walsh · Primary
- Kimberly Williams · Primary
- David P. Sokola · Cosponsor
- Bryan Townsend · Cosponsor
- Michael Ramone · Cosponsor
- Ernesto B Lopez · Cosponsor
- Bruce C. Ennis · Cosponsor
- John L. Mitchell · Primary
- Gerald L. Brady · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 52 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic
- John "Jack" Walsh Democratic
- Kimberly Williams Democratic
- John L. Mitchell
- Gerald L. Brady
Co-sponsors (5)
- David P. Sokola Democratic
- Bryan Townsend Democratic
- Michael Ramone
- Ernesto B Lopez
- Bruce C. Ennis
Not signed on (52)
52 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 52 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce C. Ennis | — | Yea |
| Colin Bonini | — | Yea |
| Ernesto B Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kyle Evans Gay | — | Yea |
| Sarah McBride | — | Yea |
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Yea |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 89 do?
- This Act makes the following changes related to traffic control devices erected on order of the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (“Secretary”) limiting the size and weight of vehicles and loads permitted on a specific highway: (1) Provides definitions of terms used on traffic control devices that limit the size or weight of vehicles or prohibit the operation of trucks or other commercial vehicles on the highway, including terms that provide exceptions to posted prohibitions, including “local service” and “residential service”. (2) Requires the Secretary, and a municipality exercising its authority under § 134(e) of Title 17 (regarding prohibiting the operation of trucks or other commercial vehicles or imposing limits as to the weight of trucks or other commercial vehicles on designated highways), to submit an order issued under this Act to the Registrar of Regulations for publication in the Register of Regulations and publish the order on the Department’s website. (3) Clarifies that violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary is a specific offense. (4) Increases the monetary penalty for a violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary over the existing penalty in § 4508 of Title 21. (5) Makes a subsequent violation of a traffic control device erected by order of the Secretary a moving violation, which results in the Department assessing points on an individual’s license based on the violation.
- Who sponsors SB 89?
- SB 89 is sponsored by Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), Kimberly Williams (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), Michael Ramone, Ernesto B Lopez, Bruce C. Ennis, John L. Mitchell, and Gerald L. Brady.
- What is the current status of SB 89?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 18, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 89?
- Track SB 89 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 89
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 89
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →