AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 247 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 247.
You're tracking SB 247
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 247 — AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
32 added · 14 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 247 updates procedures related to the appointment of temporary conservators by Probate Courts. Notably, it clarifies that petitions for such appointments can be brought by individuals who have a sufficient interest in the welfare of the respondent, and it establishes that these appointments will only be valid for a limited period unless extended or terminated by the court. This change matters because it aims to ensure that conservatorship interventions are time-limited and tailored to the immediate needs of individuals, promoting their well-being while safeguarding their rights. Additionally, the bill realigns procedural language for clarity, specifying the role of the court and the evidence required to support conservatorship decisions.
General Assembly RaisedSubstitute Bill No.
247 February Session, 2018 LCO*_____SB00247JUD___032918____* No.AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS.
1646 *01646_______JUD* Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS.
NoIf interesta shallreturn accrueor undercopy thisis subdivisionfiled with a Probate Court on anyor portionbefore ofsuch due date or expiration date, whichever is later, the fees thatassessed areshall basedbear oninterest damagesas recoveredprovided forin injuriessubdivision resulting(1) inof death.this subsection.
IfNo ainterest returnshall oraccrue copyunder isthis filedsubdivision with a Probate Court on orany beforeportion suchof due date or expiration date, whichever is later, the fees assessedthat shallare bearbased intereston asdamages providedrecovered infor subdivisioninjuries (1)resulting ofin thisdeath; subsection;
The temporary conservator shall have charge of the property or of the person of the conserved person, or both, for such period or for such specific occasion as the court finds to be necessary, provided a temporary appointment shall not be valid for more than thirty days, unless at any time while the appointment of a temporary conservator is in effect, [an application] a petition is filed for appointment of a conservator of the person or estate under section 45a-650.45a-650, as amended by this act.
The court may (A) extend the appointment of the temporary conservator until the disposition of such [application] petition under section 45a-650, as amended by this act, or for an additional thirty days, whichever occurs first, or (B) terminate the appointment of a temporary conservator upon a showing that the circumstances that gave rise to the [application] petition for appointment of a temporary conservator no longer exist.
(c) Upon receipt of [an application] a petition for the appointment of a temporary conservator, the court shall issue notice to the respondent, appoint counsel for the respondent and conduct a hearing on the [application] petition in the manner set forth in sections 45a-649, 45a-649a and 45a-650, as amended by this act, except that (1) notice to the respondent shall be given not less than five days before the hearing, which shall be conducted not later than seven days after the [application] petition is filed, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, or (2) where [an application] a petition has been made ex parte for the appointment of a temporary conservator, notice shall be given to the respondent not more than forty-eight hours after the ex parte appointment of a temporary conservator, with the hearing on such ex parte appointment to be conducted not later than three days after the ex parte appointment, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays.
(a) An executor, administrator, conservator, guardian [, trustee in insolvency] or trustee appointed, or whose appointment has been approved, by a [court of probate] Probate Court, may apply in writing to the [court of probate] Probate Court having jurisdiction of his or her trust for an order authorizing him[him] the applicant to submit the matter in controversy to the arbitration of persons who are mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the other party to any matter in controversy which is described in [subsections (a) and] this subsection or subsection (b) of this section, if:
(1) He[He] The applicant has any claim in his[his] the applicant's capacity as such fiduciary, or on behalf of the interest which he or she represents, against any person or to any property;
or (2) any person has any claim against or to any property which is in his[his] the applicant's control in his[his] the applicant's capacity as such fiduciary.
Section 45a-650 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2018):
(a) At any hearing on [an application] a petition for involuntary representation, before the court receives any evidence regarding the condition of the respondent or of the respondent's affairs, the court shall require clear and convincing evidence that the court has jurisdiction, that the respondent has been given notice as required in section 45a-649, and that the respondent has been advised of the right to retain an attorney pursuant to section 45a-649a and is either represented by an attorney or has waived the right to be represented by an attorney.
The respondent shall have the right to attend any hearing held under this section.
(b) The rules of evidence applicable to civil matters in the Superior Court shall apply to all hearings pursuant to this section.
All testimony at a hearing held pursuant to this section shall be given under oath or affirmation.
(c) (1) After making the findings required under subsection (a) of this section, the court shall receive evidence regarding the respondent's condition, the capacity of the respondent to care for himself or herself or to manage his or her affairs, and the ability of the respondent to meet his or her needs without the appointment of a conservator.
Unless waived by the court pursuant to subdivision (2) of this subsection, medical evidence shall be introduced from one or more physicians licensed to practice medicine in this state who have examined the respondent not more than forty-five days prior to the hearing, except that for a person with intellectual disability, as defined in section 1-1g, psychological evidence may be introduced in lieu of such medical evidence from a psychologist licensed pursuant to chapter 383 who has examined the respondent not more than forty-five days prior to the hearing.
The evidence shall contain specific information regarding the respondent's condition and the effect of the respondent's condition on the respondent's ability to care for himself or herself or to manage his or her affairs.
The court may also consider such other evidence as may be available and relevant, including, but not limited to, a summary of the physical and social functioning level or ability of the respondent, and the availability of support services from the family, neighbors, community or any other appropriate source.
Such evidence may include, if available, reports from the social work service of a general hospital, municipal social worker, director of social service, public health nurse, public health agency, psychologist, coordinating assessment and monitoring agencies, or such other persons as the court considers qualified to provide such evidence.
(2) The court may waive the requirement that medical evidence be presented if it is shown that the evidence is impossible to obtain because of the absence of the respondent or the respondent's refusal to be examined by a physician or that the alleged incapacity is not medical in nature.
If such requirement is waived, the court shall make a specific finding in any decree issued on the [application] petition stating why medical evidence was not required.
(3) Any hospital, psychiatric, psychological or medical record or report filed with the court pursuant to this subsection shall be confidential.
(d) Upon the filing of an application for involuntary representation pursuant to section 45a-648, as amended by this act, the court shall issue an order for the disclosure of the medical information required pursuant to this section and any psychological information submitted with respect to a person with intellectual disability pursuant to subsection (c) of this section to the respondent's attorney and, upon request, to the respondent.
The court may issue an order for the disclosure of such information to any other person as the court determines necessary.
(e) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 45a-7, the court may hold the hearing on the [application] petition at a place other than its usual courtroom if it would facilitate attendance by the respondent.
(f) (1) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is incapable of managing the respondent's affairs, that the respondent's affairs cannot be managed adequately without the appointment of a conservator and that the appointment of a conservator is the least restrictive means of intervention available to assist the respondent in managing the respondent's affairs, the court may appoint a conservator of his or her estate after considering the factors set forth in subsection (g) of this section.
(2) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is incapable of caring for himself or herself, that the respondent cannot be cared for adequately without the appointment of a conservator and that the appointment of a conservator is the least restrictive means of intervention available to assist the respondent in caring for himself or herself, the court may appoint a conservator of his or her person after considering the factors set forth in subsection (g) of this section.
(3) No conservator may be appointed if the respondent's personal needs and property management are being met adequately by an agency or individual appointed pursuant to the provisions of sections 1-350g and 1-352, or section 19a-575a, 19a-577, 19a-580e or 19a-580g.
(g) When determining whether a conservator should be appointed the court shall consider the following factors:
(1) The abilities of the respondent;
(2) the respondent's capacity to understand and articulate an informed preference regarding the care of his or her person or the management of his or her affairs;
(3) any relevant and material information obtained from the respondent;
(4) evidence of the respondent's past preferences and life style choices;
(5) the respondent's cultural background;
(6) the desirability of maintaining continuity in the respondent's life and environment;
(7) whether the respondent had previously made adequate alternative arrangements for the care of his or her person or for the management of his or her affairs, including, but not limited to, the execution of a durable power of attorney, springing power of attorney, the appointment of a health care representative or health care agent, the execution of a living will or trust or the execution of any other similar document;
(8) any relevant and material evidence from the respondent's family and any other person regarding the respondent's past practices and preferences;
Show all 63 changed lines (23 more)
and (9) any supportive services, technologies or other means that are available to assist the respondent in meeting his or her needs.
(h) The respondent or conserved person may appoint, designate or nominate a conservator or successor conservator pursuant to section 19a-575a, 19a-580e, 19a-580g or 45a-645, or may, orally or in writing, nominate a conservator or successor conservator who shall be appointed unless the court finds that the appointee, designee or nominee is unwilling or unable to serve or there is substantial evidence to disqualify such person.
If there is no such appointment, designation or nomination or if the court does not appoint the person appointed, designated or nominated by the respondent or conserved person, the court may appoint any qualified person, authorized public official or corporation in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) of section 45a-644.
In considering whom to appoint as conservator or successor conservator, the court shall consider (1) the extent to which a proposed conservator has knowledge of the respondent's or conserved person's preferences regarding the care of his or her person or the management of his or her affairs, (2) the ability of the proposed conservator to carry out the duties, responsibilities and powers of a conservator, (3) the cost of the proposed conservatorship to the estate of the respondent or conserved person, (4) the proposed conservator's commitment to promoting the respondent's or conserved person's welfare and independence, and (5) any existing or potential conflicts of interest of the proposed conservator.
(i) If the court appoints a conservator of the estate of the respondent, the court shall require a probate bond.
The court may, if it considers it necessary for the protection of the respondent, require a bond of any conservator of the person appointed under this section.
(j) Absent the court's order to the contrary and except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of section 19a-580e, a conservator appointed pursuant to this section shall be bound by all health care decisions properly made by the conserved person's health care representative.
(k) In assigning the duties of a conservator under this section the court may, in accordance with section 1-350g, limit, suspend or terminate the authority of an agent designated by the conserved person to act under a power of attorney;
and the court shall enter a specific order as to whether the authority of the agent is limited, suspended or terminated.
(l) Except as provided in subsection (k) of this section, a conserved person and his agent under a power of attorney shall retain all rights and authority not expressly assigned to the conservator.
(m) The court shall assign to a conservator appointed under this section only the duties and authority that are the least restrictive means of intervention necessary to meet the needs of the conserved person.
The court shall find by clear and convincing evidence that such duties and authority restrict the decision-making authority of the conserved person only to the extent necessary to provide for the personal needs or property management of the conserved person.
Such personal needs and property management shall be provided in a manner appropriate to the conserved person.
The court shall make a finding of the clear and convincing evidence that supports the need for each duty and authority assigned to the conservator.
(n) Nothing in this chapter shall impair, limit or diminish a conserved person's right to retain an attorney to represent such person or to seek redress of grievances in any court or administrative agency, including proceedings in the nature of habeas corpus arising out of any limitations imposed on the conserved person by court action taken under this chapter, chapter 319i, chapter 319j or section 45a-242, as amended by this act.
In any other proceeding in which the conservator has retained counsel for the conserved person, the conserved person may request the court to direct the conservator to substitute an attorney chosen by the conserved person.
Sec.
21.
20 October 1, 2018 Repealer45a-650 sectionSec. Statement of Purpose:
To:21 October 1, 2018 Repealer section Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
(1)In MakeSection minor3(m)(2), revisionsthe tonew statuteslanguage governingwas certainplaced Probateat Courtthe procedures,end andof (2)the withinsubdivision availablefor appropriations,clarity, providein eligibilitySection for17 grantsrevisions underwere themade Kinshipfor Fundgender neutrality, and Grandparentsa andnew RelativesSection Respite20 Fundwas added to certainthe nonrelativebill caregivers.for conformity with changes made in Section 14 and the remaining section was renumbered accordingly.
[ProposedJUD deletionsJoint areFavorable enclosedSubst. in brackets.
Proposed-LCO additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]
Show all 63 changed rows (23 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- R01 html
- R00 Current html
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 18-45
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 521
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDER
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
SENATE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 514
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 318
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/16/18
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0309
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Kevin D. Witkos · Primary
- Bruce V. Morris · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Witkos, Kevin D.
- Morris, Bruce V.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (185)
185 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 185 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 86 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 25 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 147 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (150)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ABERCROMBIE | — | Yea |
| PORTER | — | Yea |
| ADAMS | — | Yea |
| REED | — | Yea |
| ALBIS | — | Yea |
| REBIMBAS | — | Yea |
| ALTOBELLO | — | Yea |
| RILEY | — | Yea |
| ARCONTI | — | Yea |
| CHEESEMAN | — | Yea |
| CUMMINGS | — | Yea |
| SIEGRIST | — | Yea |
| BORER | — | Yea |
| D'AMELIO | — | Yea |
| SIMANSKI | — | Yea |
| ROSE | — | Yea |
| SKULCZYCK | — | Yea |
| ROVERO | — | Yea |
| DAVIS | — | Yea |
| CONLEY | — | Yea |
| SANCHEZ | — | Not Voting |
| SREDZINSKI | — | Yea |
| CURREY | — | Yea |
| DEVLIN | — | Yea |
| SRINIVASAN | — | Yea |
| D'AGOSTINO | — | Yea |
| STANESKI | — | Yea |
| DE LA CRUZ | — | Yea |
| SCANLON | — | Yea |
| STOKES | — | Yea |
| SERRA | — | Yea |
| DUNSBY | — | Yea |
| STORMS | — | Yea |
| SIMMONS | — | Yea |
| FERGUSON | — | Yea |
| TWEEDIE | — | Yea |
| DIMASSA | — | Yea |
| FERRARO | — | Yea |
| SOTO | — | Yea |
| WILMS | — | Yea |
| FLEISCHMANN | — | Yea |
| FLOREN | — | Yea |
| FOX | — | Yea |
| STALLWORTH | — | Yea |
| FRANCE | — | Yea |
| FREY | — | Yea |
| TERCYAK | — | Yea |
| FUSCO | — | Yea |
| TONG | — | Yea |
| GREEN | — | Yea |
| ZIOBRON | — | Yea |
| URBAN | — | Yea |
| GUERRERA | — | Yea |
| VARGAS | — | Yea |
| VERRENGIA | — | Yea |
| KLARIDES | — | Yea |
| HAMPTON | — | Yea |
| WINKLER | — | Yea |
| KOKORUDA | — | Yea |
| ARESIMOWICZ | — | Yea |
| HENNESSY | — | Yea |
| YOUNG | — | Yea |
| KUPCHICK | — | Yea |
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| ZIOGAS | — | Yea |
| LABRIOLA | — | Yea |
| JULESON-SCOPINO | — | Yea |
| LAVIELLE | — | Yea |
| LEGEYT | — | Yea |
| MACLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| BERGER | — | Yea |
| BELSITO | — | Yea |
| BETTS | — | Yea |
| COOK | — | Yea |
| BOCCHINO | — | Yea |
| OHLER | — | Yea |
| GENTILE | — | Yea |
| O'NEILL | — | Yea |
| MORIN | — | Yea |
| MORRIS | — | Not Voting |
| BYRON | — | Yea |
| ORANGE | — | Yea |
| PERONE | — | Yea |
| CAMILLO | — | Yea |
| PETIT | — | Yea |
| RYAN | — | Yea |
| Mccarthy Vahey | — | Yea |
| Mccarty, K. | — | Yea |
| Alphonse Paolillo | Democratic | Yea |
| Andre F. Baker | Democratic | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Bob Godfrey | Democratic | Yea |
| Bobby G. Gibson | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher Rosario | Democratic | Yea |
| Derek Slap | Democratic | Yea |
| Derell Wilson | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Geraldo C. Reyes | Democratic | Yea |
| Gregory Haddad | Democratic | Yea |
| Henry J. Genga | Democratic | Yea |
| Hilda E. Santiago | Democratic | Yea |
| Hilda E. Santiago | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Rojas | Democratic | Yea |
| Jonathan Steinberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Joseph P. Gresko | Democratic | Yea |
| Josh Elliott | Democratic | Yea |
| Joshua M. Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Juan R. Candelaria | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerry S. Wood | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry B. Butler | Democratic | Yea |
| Liz Linehan | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary M. Mushinsky | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew L. Lesser | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew Ritter | Democratic | Yea |
| Mike Demicco | Democratic | Yea |
| Minnie Gonzalez | Democratic | Yea |
| Patricia A. Dillon | Democratic | Yea |
| Patricia Billie Miller | Democratic | Yea |
| Patrick S. Boyd | Democratic | Yea |
| Rick Lopes | Democratic | Yea |
| Roland J. Lemar | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Stafstrom | Democratic | Yea |
| Toni E. Walker | Democratic | Yea |
| Trenee McGee | Democratic | Yea |
| Anne Dauphinais | Republican | Yea |
| Ben McGorty | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Buckbee | Republican | Yea |
| Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato | Republican | Yea |
| Carol Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Christie M. Carpino | Republican | Yea |
| Craig C. Fishbein | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dave W. Yaccarino | Republican | Yea |
| David Rutigliano | Republican | Yea |
| Devin R. Carney | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Dubitsky | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Perillo | Republican | Yea |
| Jay M. Case | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Polletta | Republican | Yea |
| John E. Piscopo | Republican | Yea |
| Kurt Vail | Republican | Yea |
| Lezlye Zupkus | Republican | Yea |
| Mitch Bolinsky | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Klarides-Ditria | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Sampson | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen G. Harding | Republican | Yea |
| Tami Zawistowski | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Ackert | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Delnicki | Republican | Yea |
| Tom O'Dea | Republican | Yea |
| Vincent J. Candelora | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. FORMICA | — | Yea |
| TIM LARSON | — | Yea |
| STEVE CASSANO | — | Yea |
| BETH BYE | — | Yea |
| EDWIN A. GOMES | — | Yea |
| TERRY B. GERRATANA | — | Yea |
| MICHAEL A. MCLACHLAN | — | Yea |
| KEVIN D. WITKOS | — | Yea |
| TONI BOUCHER | — | Yea |
| PAUL DOYLE | — | Yea |
| CARLO LEONE | — | Yea |
| CRAIG MINER | — | Yea |
| LEN SUZIO | — | Yea |
| GAYLE SLOSSBERG | — | Yea |
| ART LINARES | — | Yea |
| JOE MARKLEY | — | Yea |
| LEONARD FASANO | — | Yea |
| GEORGE LOGAN | — | Yea |
| ANTHONY GUGLIELMO | — | Yea |
| L. SCOTT FRANTZ | — | Yea |
| Kevin C. Kelly | — | Yea |
| Marilyn Moore | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Heather S. Somers | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 247?
- SB 247 is sponsored by Witkos, Kevin D. and Morris, Bruce V..
- What is the current status of SB 247?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 247?
- Track SB 247 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 247
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 247
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →