Delaware 150th General Assembly (2019-2020) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 11 D · 6 R cosponsors

SB 169 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE DELAWARE UNIFORM CIVIL REMEDIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF INTIMATE IMAGES ACT.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 19, 2019. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 27 sponsors

    4 primary, 23 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (11 D · 6 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

This Act adopts the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act. This Act addresses an increasingly common form of abuse that can cause severe and often irreversible harm: the disclosure of private, sexually explicit images without consent. Much of the abuse is carried out electronically through internet websites, social media, email, or text messages, making it an interstate problem that is particularly suited for treatment by uniform state laws. This Act provides a uniform, comprehensive, clear, fair, and constitutionally sound definition of this harmful conduct and remedies for the harm it causes. Some intimate images disclosed without consent were originally created with consent or obtained within a confidential relationship. In other cases, the images were originally created or obtained without consent through surreptitious recording devices or other forms of voyeurism, or through theft, computer hacking, coercion, bribery, fraud, or force. Like many existing privacy laws, this Act applies only to sensitive content created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Also similar to existing privacy laws, the Act includes limited exceptions for certain disclosures, including those made in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings or education, medical treatment, or investigations of misconduct. This Act also includes an exception for disclosures relating to matters of public concern or public interest and disclosures reasonably intended to assist the victim. The Act further notes federal statutory limitations on the liability of providers and users of interactive computer services. The Act is narrowly drafted to avoid imposing liability on a discloser who lacks the requisite awareness of any of these elements: (1) that the image was created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy or that the image was obtained through theft, bribery, false pretenses, voyeurism, or other wrongful acts, (2) that the individual shown in the image did not consent to the disclosure, or (3) that the individual shown was identifiable.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

162 added · 12 removed

162 line(s) added, 12 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Hansen DELAWARE STATE SENATE 150th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
Hansen & Rep.
1 TO SENATE BILL NO.
Griffith & Rep.
169 AMEND Senate Bill No.
Bennett & Rep.
169 on line 116 between “(a)” and “This” by inserting “(1)” therein.
Dorsey Walker Sens.
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
Brown, Cloutier, Delcollo, Ennis, Hocker, Lawson, Lockman, Lopez, McBride, McDowell, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Poore, Richardson, Sokola, Sturgeon, Townsend, Walsh, Wilson;
169 between lines 117 and 118 by inserting the following:
Reps.
“(2) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to impose liability on an interactive computer service, as defined in the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C.
Brady, Briggs King, Osienski, Michael Smith DELAWARE STATE SENATE 150th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO.
Section 230(f)(2), for content provided by another person.”.
169 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE DELAWARE UNIFORM CIVIL REMEDIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF INTIMATE IMAGES ACT.
SYNOPSIS This Amendment clarifies that interactive computer services are not liable under this Act for content provided by another person.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1.
Amend Part IV, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
Chapter 78.
Delaware Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act.
§ 7801.
Short title.
This chapter may be cited as the “Delaware Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act” or “DUCRUDIIA”.
§ 7802.
Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter:
(1) “Consent” means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization by an individual with legal capacity to give authorization.
(2) “Depicted individual” means an individual whose body is shown in whole or in part in an intimate image.
(3) “Disclosure” means transfer, publication, or distribution to another person.
“Disclose” has a corresponding meaning.
(4) “Identifiable” means recognizable by a person other than the depicted individual from any of the following:
a.
An intimate image itself.
b.
An intimate image and identifying characteristic displayed in connection with the intimate image.
(5) “Identifying characteristic” means information that may be used to identify a depicted individual.
(6) “Individual” means a human being.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 1 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM (7) “Intimate image” means a photograph, film, video recording, or other similar medium that shows 1 or more of the following:
a.
The uncovered genitals, pubic area, anus, or female post-pubescent nipple of a depicted individual.
b.
A depicted individual engaging in or being subjected to sexual conduct.
(8) “Person” means an individual, estate, business or nonprofit entity, public corporation, government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, or other legal entity.
(9) “Sexual conduct” includes any of the following:
Show all 153 changed rows (113 more)
Previous
Latest
a.
Masturbation.
b.
Genital, anal, or oral sex.
c.
Sexual penetration of, or with, an object.
d.
Bestiality.
e.
The transfer of semen onto a depicted individual.
§ 7803.
Civil action.
(a) In this section:
(1) “Harm” includes physical harm, economic harm, and emotional distress whether or not accompanied by physical or economic harm.
(2) “Private” means 1 or more of the following:
a.
Created or obtained under circumstances in which a depicted individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
b.
Made accessible through theft, bribery, extortion, fraud, false pretenses, sexual exploitation of a minor, violation of privacy, or computer-related offenses.
(b) Except as otherwise provided under § 7804 of this title, a depicted individual who is identifiable and who suffers harm from a person’s intentional disclosure or threatened disclosure of an intimate image that was private without the depicted individual’s consent has a cause of action against the person if the person knew or acted with reckless disregard for all of the following:
(1) The depicted individual did not consent to the disclosure.
(2) The intimate image was private.
(3) The depicted individual was identifiable.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 2 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM (c) The following conduct by a depicted individual does not establish by itself that the individual consented to the disclosure of the intimate image which is the subject of an action under this chapter or that the individual lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy:
(1) Consent to creation of the image.
(2) Previous consensual disclosure of the image.
(d) A depicted individual who does not consent to the sexual conduct or uncovering of the part of the body depicted in an intimate image of the individual retains a reasonable expectation of privacy even if the image was created when the individual was in a public place.
§ 7804.
Exceptions to liability.
(a) In this section:
(1) “Child” means an unemancipated individual who is less than 18 years of age.
(2) “Parent” means an individual recognized as a parent under law of this State other than this chapter.
(b) A person is not liable under this chapter if the person proves that disclosure of, or a threat to disclose, an intimate image meets any of the following:
(1) Made in good faith in any of the following:
a.
Law enforcement.
b.
A legal proceeding.
c.
Medical education or treatment.
(2) Made in good faith in the reporting or investigation of 1 or more of the following:
a.
Unlawful conduct.
b.
Unsolicited and unwelcome conduct.
(3) Related to a matter of public concern or public interest.
(4) Reasonably intended to assist the depicted individual.
(c) Subject to subsection (d) of this section, a defendant who is a parent or guardian of a child is not liable under this chapter for a disclosure or threatened disclosure of an intimate image, as defined under § 7802(7)a.
of this title, of the child.
(d) If a defendant asserts an exception to liability under subsection (c) of this section, the exception does not apply if the plaintiff proves the disclosure was any of the following:
(1) Prohibited by law other than this chapter.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 3 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM 77 (2) Made for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, humiliation, degradation, or monetary or commercial gain.
(e) Disclosure of, or a threat to disclose, an intimate image is not a matter of public concern or public interest solely because the depicted individual is a public figure.
§ 7805.
Plaintiff’s privacy.
In an action under this chapter:
(1) The court may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the plaintiff.
(2) A plaintiff to whom paragraph (1) of this section applies shall file with the court and serve on the defendant a confidential information form that includes the excluded or redacted plaintiff’s name and other identifying characteristics.
(3) The court may make further orders as necessary to protect the identity and privacy of a plaintiff.
§ 7806.
Remedies.
(a) In an action under this chapter, a prevailing plaintiff may recover all of the following:
(1) The greater of either of the following:
a.
Economic and noneconomic damages proximately caused by the defendant’s disclosure or threatened disclosure, including damages for emotional distress whether or not accompanied by other damages.
b.
Statutory damages not to exceed $10,000 against each defendant found liable under this chapter for all disclosures and threatened disclosures by the defendant of which the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known when filing the action or which became known during the pendency of the action.
In determining the amount of statutory damages under paragraph (a)(1)b.
of this section, consideration must be given to the age of the parties at the time of the disclosure or threatened disclosure, the number of disclosures or threatened disclosures made by the defendant, the breadth of distribution of the image by the defendant, and other exacerbating or mitigating factors.
(2) An amount equal to any monetary gain made by the defendant from disclosure of the intimate image.
(3) Punitive damages.
(b) In an action under this chapter, the court may award a prevailing plaintiff any of the following:
(1) Reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
(2) Additional relief, including injunctive relief.
(c) This chapter does not affect a right or remedy available under law of this State other than this chapter.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 4 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM § 7807.
Statute of Limitations.
(a) An action under § 7803(b) of this title for:
(1) An unauthorized disclosure may not be brought later than 4 years from the date the disclosure was discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of reasonable diligence.
(2) A threat to disclose may not be brought later than 4 years from the date of the threat to disclose.
(b) In an action under § 7803(b) of this title by a depicted individual who was a minor on the date of the disclosure or threat to disclose, the time specified in subsection (a) of this section does not begin to run until the depicted individual attained 18 years of age.
§ 7808.
Construction.
(a) This chapter must be construed to be consistent with the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C.
Section 230.
(b) This chapter may not be construed to alter the law of this State on sovereign immunity.
§ 7809.
Uniformity of Application and Construction.
In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.
SYNOPSIS This Act adopts the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act.
This Act addresses an increasingly common form of abuse that can cause severe and often irreversible harm:
the disclosure of private, sexually explicit images without consent.
Much of the abuse is carried out electronically through internet websites, social media, email, or text messages, making it an interstate problem that is particularly suited for treatment by uniform state laws.
This Act provides a uniform, comprehensive, clear, fair, and constitutionally sound definition of this harmful conduct and remedies for the harm it causes.
Some intimate images disclosed without consent were originally created with consent or obtained within a confidential relationship.
In other cases, the images were originally created or obtained without consent through surreptitious recording devices or other forms of voyeurism, or through theft, computer hacking, coercion, bribery, fraud, or force.
Like many existing privacy laws, this Act applies only to sensitive content created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Also similar to existing privacy laws, the Act includes limited exceptions for certain disclosures, including those made in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings or education, medical treatment, or investigations of misconduct.
This Act also includes an exception for disclosures relating to matters of public concern or public interest and disclosures reasonably intended to assist the victim.
The Act further notes federal statutory limitations on the liability of providers and users of interactive computer services.
The Act is narrowly drafted to avoid imposing liability on a discloser who lacks the requisite awareness of any of these elements:
(1) that the image was created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy or that the image was obtained through theft, bribery, false pretenses, voyeurism, or other wrongful acts, (2) that the individual shown in the image did not consent to the disclosure, or (3) that the individual shown was identifiable.
CM Page 1 of 1 Released:
NMX Page 5 of 5 Released:
01/14/2020 11:43 AM 5971500251
06/19/2019 12:59 PM 5971500081
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By House. Votes: 41 YES

  3. Suspension of Rules in House

  4. Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

  5. Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT

  6. Amendment SA 1 to SB 169 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT

  7. Reported Out of Committee (Transportation) in Senate with 1 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits

  8. Amendment SA 1 to SB 169 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  9. Introduced and Assigned to Transportation Committee in Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 23 co-sponsors · 35 not signed on

Not signed on (35)

35 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 35 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3/4

Passed 41 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 17000
Democratic 12000
Republican 12000
Total 41000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
Earl G. Jaques Jr. — Yea
Gerald L. Brady — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John J. Viola — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Quinton Johnson — Yea
Raymond Seigfried — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Yea
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stephen Smyk — Yea
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 20 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Democratic 9000
Republican 4001
Total 20001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Anthony Delcollo — Yea
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Catherine Cloutier — Yea
Colin Bonini — Yea
David B. McBride — Yea
Ernesto B Lopez — Yea
Harris B. McDowell — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Not Voting
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 169 do?
This Act adopts the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act. This Act addresses an increasingly common form of abuse that can cause severe and often irreversible harm: the disclosure of private, sexually explicit images without consent. Much of the abuse is carried out electronically through internet websites, social media, email, or text messages, making it an interstate problem that is particularly suited for treatment by uniform state laws. This Act provides a uniform, comprehensive, clear, fair, and constitutionally sound definition of this harmful conduct and remedies for the harm it causes. Some intimate images disclosed without consent were originally created with consent or obtained within a confidential relationship. In other cases, the images were originally created or obtained without consent through surreptitious recording devices or other forms of voyeurism, or through theft, computer hacking, coercion, bribery, fraud, or force. Like many existing privacy laws, this Act applies only to sensitive content created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Also similar to existing privacy laws, the Act includes limited exceptions for certain disclosures, including those made in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings or education, medical treatment, or investigations of misconduct. This Act also includes an exception for disclosures relating to matters of public concern or public interest and disclosures reasonably intended to assist the victim. The Act further notes federal statutory limitations on the liability of providers and users of interactive computer services. The Act is narrowly drafted to avoid imposing liability on a discloser who lacks the requisite awareness of any of these elements: (1) that the image was created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy or that the image was obtained through theft, bribery, false pretenses, voyeurism, or other wrongful acts, (2) that the individual shown in the image did not consent to the disclosure, or (3) that the individual shown was identifiable.
Who sponsors SB 169?
SB 169 is sponsored by Michael F. Smith (Republican), Edward S. Osienski (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), Nicole Poore (Democratic), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), S. Elizabeth Lockman (Democratic), Dave G. Lawson (Republican), Gerald W. Hocker (Republican), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Krista Griffith (Democratic), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), Trey Paradee (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), Andria L. Bennett, Sherry Dorsey Walker, Catherine Cloutier, Anthony Delcollo, Bruce C. Ennis, Ernesto B Lopez, David B. McBride, Harris B. McDowell, Gerald L. Brady, and Ruth Briggs King.
What is the current status of SB 169?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 19, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 169?
Track SB 169 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 169

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 169

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →