SB 169 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 10 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE DELAWARE UNIFORM CIVIL REMEDIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF INTIMATE IMAGES ACT.
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 19, 2019. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
27 sponsors
4 primary, 23 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (11 D · 6 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
This Act adopts the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act. This Act addresses an increasingly common form of abuse that can cause severe and often irreversible harm: the disclosure of private, sexually explicit images without consent. Much of the abuse is carried out electronically through internet websites, social media, email, or text messages, making it an interstate problem that is particularly suited for treatment by uniform state laws. This Act provides a uniform, comprehensive, clear, fair, and constitutionally sound definition of this harmful conduct and remedies for the harm it causes. Some intimate images disclosed without consent were originally created with consent or obtained within a confidential relationship. In other cases, the images were originally created or obtained without consent through surreptitious recording devices or other forms of voyeurism, or through theft, computer hacking, coercion, bribery, fraud, or force. Like many existing privacy laws, this Act applies only to sensitive content created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Also similar to existing privacy laws, the Act includes limited exceptions for certain disclosures, including those made in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings or education, medical treatment, or investigations of misconduct. This Act also includes an exception for disclosures relating to matters of public concern or public interest and disclosures reasonably intended to assist the victim. The Act further notes federal statutory limitations on the liability of providers and users of interactive computer services. The Act is narrowly drafted to avoid imposing liability on a discloser who lacks the requisite awareness of any of these elements: (1) that the image was created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy or that the image was obtained through theft, bribery, false pretenses, voyeurism, or other wrongful acts, (2) that the individual shown in the image did not consent to the disclosure, or (3) that the individual shown was identifiable.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
162 added · 12 removed162 line(s) added, 12 removed.
Hansen DELAWARE& STATERep. SENATE 150th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
1Griffith TO& SENATERep. BILL NO.
169Bennett AMEND& SenateRep. Bill No.
169Dorsey onWalker lineSens. 116 between “(a)” and “This” by inserting “(1)” therein.
FURTHERBrown, AMENDCloutier, SenateDelcollo, BillEnnis, No.Hocker, Lawson, Lockman, Lopez, McBride, McDowell, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Poore, Richardson, Sokola, Sturgeon, Townsend, Walsh, Wilson;
169Reps. between lines 117 and 118 by inserting the following:
“(2)Brady, NothingBriggs inKing, thisOsienski, chapterMichael maySmith beDELAWARE construedSTATE toSENATE impose150th liabilityGENERAL onASSEMBLY anSENATE interactiveBILL computerNO. service, as defined in the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C.
Section169 230(f)(2),AN forACT contentTO providedAMEND byTITLE another10 person.”.OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE DELAWARE UNIFORM CIVIL REMEDIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF INTIMATE IMAGES ACT.
SYNOPSISBE ThisIT AmendmentENACTED clarifiesBY thatTHE interactiveGENERAL computerASSEMBLY servicesOF areTHE notSTATE liableOF underDELAWARE: this Act for content provided by another person.
Section 1.
Amend Part IV, Title 10 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
Chapter 78.
Delaware Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act.
§ 7801.
Short title.
This chapter may be cited as the “Delaware Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act” or “DUCRUDIIA”.
§ 7802.
Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter:
(1) “Consent” means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization by an individual with legal capacity to give authorization.
(2) “Depicted individual” means an individual whose body is shown in whole or in part in an intimate image.
(3) “Disclosure” means transfer, publication, or distribution to another person.
“Disclose” has a corresponding meaning.
(4) “Identifiable” means recognizable by a person other than the depicted individual from any of the following:
a.
An intimate image itself.
b.
An intimate image and identifying characteristic displayed in connection with the intimate image.
(5) “Identifying characteristic” means information that may be used to identify a depicted individual.
(6) “Individual” means a human being.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 1 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM (7) “Intimate image” means a photograph, film, video recording, or other similar medium that shows 1 or more of the following:
a.
The uncovered genitals, pubic area, anus, or female post-pubescent nipple of a depicted individual.
b.
A depicted individual engaging in or being subjected to sexual conduct.
(8) “Person” means an individual, estate, business or nonprofit entity, public corporation, government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, or other legal entity.
(9) “Sexual conduct” includes any of the following:
Show all 153 changed lines (113 more)
a.
Masturbation.
b.
Genital, anal, or oral sex.
c.
Sexual penetration of, or with, an object.
d.
Bestiality.
e.
The transfer of semen onto a depicted individual.
§ 7803.
Civil action.
(a) In this section:
(1) “Harm” includes physical harm, economic harm, and emotional distress whether or not accompanied by physical or economic harm.
(2) “Private” means 1 or more of the following:
a.
Created or obtained under circumstances in which a depicted individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
b.
Made accessible through theft, bribery, extortion, fraud, false pretenses, sexual exploitation of a minor, violation of privacy, or computer-related offenses.
(b) Except as otherwise provided under § 7804 of this title, a depicted individual who is identifiable and who suffers harm from a person’s intentional disclosure or threatened disclosure of an intimate image that was private without the depicted individual’s consent has a cause of action against the person if the person knew or acted with reckless disregard for all of the following:
(1) The depicted individual did not consent to the disclosure.
(2) The intimate image was private.
(3) The depicted individual was identifiable.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 2 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM (c) The following conduct by a depicted individual does not establish by itself that the individual consented to the disclosure of the intimate image which is the subject of an action under this chapter or that the individual lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy:
(1) Consent to creation of the image.
(2) Previous consensual disclosure of the image.
(d) A depicted individual who does not consent to the sexual conduct or uncovering of the part of the body depicted in an intimate image of the individual retains a reasonable expectation of privacy even if the image was created when the individual was in a public place.
§ 7804.
Exceptions to liability.
(a) In this section:
(1) “Child” means an unemancipated individual who is less than 18 years of age.
(2) “Parent” means an individual recognized as a parent under law of this State other than this chapter.
(b) A person is not liable under this chapter if the person proves that disclosure of, or a threat to disclose, an intimate image meets any of the following:
(1) Made in good faith in any of the following:
a.
Law enforcement.
b.
A legal proceeding.
c.
Medical education or treatment.
(2) Made in good faith in the reporting or investigation of 1 or more of the following:
a.
Unlawful conduct.
b.
Unsolicited and unwelcome conduct.
(3) Related to a matter of public concern or public interest.
(4) Reasonably intended to assist the depicted individual.
(c) Subject to subsection (d) of this section, a defendant who is a parent or guardian of a child is not liable under this chapter for a disclosure or threatened disclosure of an intimate image, as defined under § 7802(7)a.
of this title, of the child.
(d) If a defendant asserts an exception to liability under subsection (c) of this section, the exception does not apply if the plaintiff proves the disclosure was any of the following:
(1) Prohibited by law other than this chapter.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 3 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM 77 (2) Made for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification, humiliation, degradation, or monetary or commercial gain.
(e) Disclosure of, or a threat to disclose, an intimate image is not a matter of public concern or public interest solely because the depicted individual is a public figure.
§ 7805.
Plaintiff’s privacy.
In an action under this chapter:
(1) The court may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the plaintiff.
(2) A plaintiff to whom paragraph (1) of this section applies shall file with the court and serve on the defendant a confidential information form that includes the excluded or redacted plaintiff’s name and other identifying characteristics.
(3) The court may make further orders as necessary to protect the identity and privacy of a plaintiff.
§ 7806.
Remedies.
(a) In an action under this chapter, a prevailing plaintiff may recover all of the following:
(1) The greater of either of the following:
a.
Economic and noneconomic damages proximately caused by the defendant’s disclosure or threatened disclosure, including damages for emotional distress whether or not accompanied by other damages.
b.
Statutory damages not to exceed $10,000 against each defendant found liable under this chapter for all disclosures and threatened disclosures by the defendant of which the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known when filing the action or which became known during the pendency of the action.
In determining the amount of statutory damages under paragraph (a)(1)b.
of this section, consideration must be given to the age of the parties at the time of the disclosure or threatened disclosure, the number of disclosures or threatened disclosures made by the defendant, the breadth of distribution of the image by the defendant, and other exacerbating or mitigating factors.
(2) An amount equal to any monetary gain made by the defendant from disclosure of the intimate image.
(3) Punitive damages.
(b) In an action under this chapter, the court may award a prevailing plaintiff any of the following:
(1) Reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
(2) Additional relief, including injunctive relief.
(c) This chapter does not affect a right or remedy available under law of this State other than this chapter.
LC :
DIG :
NMX Page 4 of 5 Released:
06/19/2019 12:59 PM § 7807.
Statute of Limitations.
(a) An action under § 7803(b) of this title for:
(1) An unauthorized disclosure may not be brought later than 4 years from the date the disclosure was discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of reasonable diligence.
(2) A threat to disclose may not be brought later than 4 years from the date of the threat to disclose.
(b) In an action under § 7803(b) of this title by a depicted individual who was a minor on the date of the disclosure or threat to disclose, the time specified in subsection (a) of this section does not begin to run until the depicted individual attained 18 years of age.
§ 7808.
Construction.
(a) This chapter must be construed to be consistent with the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C.
Section 230.
(b) This chapter may not be construed to alter the law of this State on sovereign immunity.
§ 7809.
Uniformity of Application and Construction.
In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.
SYNOPSIS This Act adopts the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act.
This Act addresses an increasingly common form of abuse that can cause severe and often irreversible harm:
the disclosure of private, sexually explicit images without consent.
Much of the abuse is carried out electronically through internet websites, social media, email, or text messages, making it an interstate problem that is particularly suited for treatment by uniform state laws.
This Act provides a uniform, comprehensive, clear, fair, and constitutionally sound definition of this harmful conduct and remedies for the harm it causes.
Some intimate images disclosed without consent were originally created with consent or obtained within a confidential relationship.
In other cases, the images were originally created or obtained without consent through surreptitious recording devices or other forms of voyeurism, or through theft, computer hacking, coercion, bribery, fraud, or force.
Like many existing privacy laws, this Act applies only to sensitive content created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Also similar to existing privacy laws, the Act includes limited exceptions for certain disclosures, including those made in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings or education, medical treatment, or investigations of misconduct.
This Act also includes an exception for disclosures relating to matters of public concern or public interest and disclosures reasonably intended to assist the victim.
The Act further notes federal statutory limitations on the liability of providers and users of interactive computer services.
The Act is narrowly drafted to avoid imposing liability on a discloser who lacks the requisite awareness of any of these elements:
(1) that the image was created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy or that the image was obtained through theft, bribery, false pretenses, voyeurism, or other wrongful acts, (2) that the individual shown in the image did not consent to the disclosure, or (3) that the individual shown was identifiable.
CMNMX Page 15 of 15 Released:
01/14/202006/19/2019 11:4312:59 AMPM 59715002515971500081
Show all 153 changed rows (113 more)
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Passed By House. Votes: 41 YES
-
Suspension of Rules in House
-
Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT
-
Amendment SA 1 to SB 169 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT
-
Reported Out of Committee (Transportation) in Senate with 1 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
-
Amendment SA 1 to SB 169 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Introduced and Assigned to Transportation Committee in Senate
Sponsors
- Michael F. Smith · Cosponsor
- Edward S. Osienski · Cosponsor
- David L. Wilson · Cosponsor
- Bryan Townsend · Cosponsor
- David P. Sokola · Cosponsor
- Bryant L. Richardson · Cosponsor
- Nicole Poore · Cosponsor
- Brian Pettyjohn · Cosponsor
- S. Elizabeth Lockman · Cosponsor
- Dave G. Lawson · Cosponsor
- Gerald W. Hocker · Cosponsor
- Darius J. Brown · Cosponsor
- Krista Griffith · Primary
- Stephanie L. Hansen · Primary
- Trey Paradee · Cosponsor
- Laura V. Sturgeon · Cosponsor
- John "Jack" Walsh · Cosponsor
- Andria L. Bennett · Primary
- Sherry Dorsey Walker · Primary
- Catherine Cloutier · Cosponsor
- Anthony Delcollo · Cosponsor
- Bruce C. Ennis · Cosponsor
- Ernesto B Lopez · Cosponsor
- David B. McBride · Cosponsor
- Harris B. McDowell · Cosponsor
- Gerald L. Brady · Cosponsor
- Ruth Briggs King · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 23 co-sponsors · 35 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Krista Griffith Democratic
- Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic
- Andria L. Bennett
- Sherry Dorsey Walker
Co-sponsors (23)
- Michael F. Smith Republican
- Edward S. Osienski Democratic
- David L. Wilson Republican
- Bryan Townsend Democratic
- David P. Sokola Democratic
- Bryant L. Richardson Republican
- Nicole Poore Democratic
- Brian Pettyjohn Republican
- S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic
- Dave G. Lawson Republican
- Gerald W. Hocker Republican
- Darius J. Brown Democratic
- Trey Paradee Democratic
- Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic
- John "Jack" Walsh Democratic
- Catherine Cloutier
- Anthony Delcollo
- Bruce C. Ennis
- Ernesto B Lopez
- David B. McBride
- Harris B. McDowell
- Gerald L. Brady
- Ruth Briggs King
Not signed on (35)
35 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 35 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (41)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony Delcollo | — | Yea |
| Bruce C. Ennis | — | Yea |
| Catherine Cloutier | — | Yea |
| Colin Bonini | — | Yea |
| David B. McBride | — | Yea |
| Ernesto B Lopez | — | Yea |
| Harris B. McDowell | — | Yea |
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Yea |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Yea |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 169 do?
- This Act adopts the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act. This Act addresses an increasingly common form of abuse that can cause severe and often irreversible harm: the disclosure of private, sexually explicit images without consent. Much of the abuse is carried out electronically through internet websites, social media, email, or text messages, making it an interstate problem that is particularly suited for treatment by uniform state laws. This Act provides a uniform, comprehensive, clear, fair, and constitutionally sound definition of this harmful conduct and remedies for the harm it causes. Some intimate images disclosed without consent were originally created with consent or obtained within a confidential relationship. In other cases, the images were originally created or obtained without consent through surreptitious recording devices or other forms of voyeurism, or through theft, computer hacking, coercion, bribery, fraud, or force. Like many existing privacy laws, this Act applies only to sensitive content created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Also similar to existing privacy laws, the Act includes limited exceptions for certain disclosures, including those made in the course of law enforcement, legal proceedings or education, medical treatment, or investigations of misconduct. This Act also includes an exception for disclosures relating to matters of public concern or public interest and disclosures reasonably intended to assist the victim. The Act further notes federal statutory limitations on the liability of providers and users of interactive computer services. The Act is narrowly drafted to avoid imposing liability on a discloser who lacks the requisite awareness of any of these elements: (1) that the image was created or obtained under circumstances in which the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy or that the image was obtained through theft, bribery, false pretenses, voyeurism, or other wrongful acts, (2) that the individual shown in the image did not consent to the disclosure, or (3) that the individual shown was identifiable.
- Who sponsors SB 169?
- SB 169 is sponsored by Michael F. Smith (Republican), Edward S. Osienski (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), Nicole Poore (Democratic), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), S. Elizabeth Lockman (Democratic), Dave G. Lawson (Republican), Gerald W. Hocker (Republican), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Krista Griffith (Democratic), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), Trey Paradee (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), Andria L. Bennett, Sherry Dorsey Walker, Catherine Cloutier, Anthony Delcollo, Bruce C. Ennis, Ernesto B Lopez, David B. McBride, Harris B. McDowell, Gerald L. Brady, and Ruth Briggs King.
- What is the current status of SB 169?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced June 19, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 169?
- Track SB 169 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 169
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 169
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →