Delaware 150th General Assembly (2019-2020) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 12 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 32 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING PATIENT BROKERING.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 14, 2019. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 20 sponsors

    3 primary, 17 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (12 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

This Act prohibits the practice known as patient brokering, which is the practice where patient brokers are paid a fee to place insured people in treatment centers so that the treatment centers receive thousands of dollars in insurance claim payments for each patient. Increasingly, patient brokers fraudulently enroll patients in low-deductible health plans with out-of-network treatment benefits. Patient brokers target individuals with substance use disorders, who are told that they are receiving their treatment through a scholarship. Not only does this perpetrate fraud against insurers, when insurance plans are terminated for nonpayment of the premium, individuals are discharged from the treatment program with no services or housing and often in a state that is far from home.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

26 added · 121 removed

26 line(s) added, 121 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Brown & Rep.
Brown DELAWARE STATE SENATE 150th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
Bentz & Rep.
1 TO SENATE BILL NO.
Minor-Brown Sens.
32 FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
Delcollo, Ennis, Hansen, Lawson, Sokola, Sturgeon, Townsend;
32 by deleting lines 51 and 52 in their entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Reps.
“(1)a.
Baumbach, Bennett, Bolden, Chukwuocha, Heffernan, Q.
Any discount, payment, remuneration, waiver of payment, or payment practice not prohibited by § 1128B of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
Johnson, Kowalko, Osienski, Seigfried, K.
§ 1320a-7b, and its implementing regulations, 42 C.F.R § 1001.
Williams DELAWARE STATE SENATE 150th GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO.
32 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING PATIENT BROKERING.
WHEREAS, patient brokering is when patient brokers are paid a fee to place insured people in treatment centers, which receive thousands of dollars in claims for each patient;
and WHEREAS, there has been an increase in the practice involving fraudulent enrollments, with Pennsylvania and Delaware being 2 of the states where Blue Cross has been hardest hit with fraudulent enrollments;
and WHEREAS, patient brokering has been targeting individuals struggling with addiction;
and WHEREAS, individuals are told that they are receiving treatment under a scholarship or anonymous donor but are actually being enrolled in health insurance plans without their knowledge, often using a fake address;
and WHEREAS, health insurance plans that offer low deductible plans with out-of-network treatment benefits are targeted for fraudulent enrollments;
and WHEREAS, individuals who are admitted for treatment based upon fraudulent enrollment in a health insurance plan are discharged, with no services or housing, when the health insurance policy is terminated for non-payment of premiums or identified by health payers as fraudulent;
and WHEREAS, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Tennessee, and Utah have enacted laws prohibiting patient brokering;
and WHEREAS, legislation prohibiting patient brokering has been introduced in Georgia, New York, and Rhode Island;
and WHEREAS, patient brokering harms individuals seeking medical treatment, especially individuals suffering from addiction, as well as insurance carriers.
NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1.
Amend Title 6 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
Chapter 25E.
Patient Brokering.
LC :
DIG :
CM Page 1 of 4 Released:
03/13/2019 10:28 AM § 2501E.
Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter:
(1) "Carrier" means any entity that provides health insurance in this State.
"Carrier" includes an insurance company, health service corporation, health maintenance organization, and any other entity providing a plan of health insurance or health benefits subject to state insurance regulation.
"Carrier" also includes any third-party administrator or other entity that adjusts, administers, or settles claims in connection with health benefit plans.
(2) "Health benefit plan" means any hospital or medical policy or certificate, major medical expense insurance, health service corporation subscriber contract, or health maintenance organization subscriber contract.
(3) “Health-care facility” means an institution, facility, or agency licensed, certified, or otherwise authorized or permitted by law to provide health care in the ordinary course of business.
(4) “Health-care provider” means an individual licensed, certified, or otherwise authorized or permitted by law to provide health care in the ordinary course of business or practice of a profession.
§ 2502E.
Patient brokering prohibited.
(a) A person may not engage in patient brokering.
(b) A person engages in patient brokering by doing any of the following:
Show all 89 changed rows (49 more)
Previous
Latest
(1) Offering or paying a commission, benefit, bonus, rebate, kickback, or bribe, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, or engaging in any form of split-fee arrangement, to induce the referral of a patient or patronage to or from a health-care provider or health-care facility.
(2) Soliciting or receiving a commission, benefit, bonus, rebate, kickback, or bribe, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, or engaging in any form of split-fee arrangement, in return for referring a patient or patronage to or from a health-care provider or health-care facility.
(3) Soliciting or receiving a commission, benefit, bonus, rebate, kickback, or bribe, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, or engaging in any form of a split-fee arrangement, in return for the acceptance or acknowledgement of treatment from a health-care provider or health-care facility.
(4) Aid, abet, advise, or otherwise participate in the conduct prohibited under this section.
§ 2503E.
Application.
This section does not apply to any of the following:
(1) Any discount, payment, waiver of payment, or payment practice not prohibited by 42 U.S.C.
§ 1320a- 7b(b).
LC :
DIG :
CM Page 2 of 4 Released:
03/13/2019 10:28 AM (2) Any payment, compensation, or financial arrangement within a group practice, if the payment, compensation, or arrangement is not to or from a person who is not a member of the group practice.
(3) Payments to a health-care provider or health-care facility for professional consultation services.
(4) Commissions, fees, or other remuneration lawfully paid to insurance agents as provided under Title 18.
(5) Payments by a carrier who reimburses, provides, offers to provide, or administers health, mental health, or substance abuse goods or services under a health benefit plan.
(6) Payments to or by a health-care provider or health-care facility, or a health-care provider network entity, that has contracted with a carrier, a health-care purchasing group, Medicare, or Medicaid to provide health, metal health, or substance abuse goods or services under a health benefit plan when such payments are for goods or services under the plan.
(7) Payments by a health-care provider or health-care facility to a health, mental health, or substance abuse information service that provides information upon request and without charge to consumers about providers of health- care goods or services to enable consumers to select appropriate providers or facilities, provided that the information service meets all of the following criteria:
a.
Does not attempt through its standard questions for solicitation of consumer criteria or through any other means to steer or lead a consumer to select or consider selection of a particular health-care provider or health-care facility.
Does not provide or represent itself as providing diagnostic or counseling services or assessments of illness or injury and does not make any promises of cure or guarantees of treatment.
This paragraph (1) of this section includes a patient, claim, or benefit under a Federal health care program, as defined under § 1128B(f) the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
c.
§ 1320a-7b(f), or a health benefit plan.”.
Does not provide or arrange for transportation of a consumer to or from the location of a health-care provider or health-care facility.
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
d.
32 between lines 85 and 86 by inserting the following:
Charges and collects fees from a health-care provider or health-care facility participating in its services that are set in advance, are consistent with the fair market value for those information services, and are not based on the potential value of a patient or patients to a health-care provider or health-care facility or of the goods or services provided by the health-care provider or health-care facility.
“(11) Payments to a health-care provider or health-care facility under the requirements of a contract with the State to provide assistance to individuals with mental health conditions or substance use disorders in identifying and obtaining resources to pay for treatment, including clinical and related services for an individual with a mental health condition or substance use disorder.”.
(8) An individual employed by the assisted living facility, or with whom the facility contracts to provide marketing services for the facility, if the individual clearly indicates that they work with or for the facility.
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
(9) Payments by an assisted living facility to a referral service that provides information, consultation, or referrals to consumers to assist them in finding appropriate care or housing options for seniors or disabled adults if the referred consumers are not Medicaid recipients.
32 on line 87 by inserting “(a)” before “The” therein.
LC :
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
DIG :
32 between lines 88 and 89 by inserting the following:
CM Page 3 of 4 Released:
“(b) A violation of this chapter shall be deemed an unlawful practice under § 2513 of this title and a violation of Subchapter II of Chapter 25 of this title.
03/13/2019 10:28 AM 83 (10) A resident of an assisted living facility who refers a friend, family member, or other individual with whom the resident has a personal relationship to the assisted living facility, in which case the assisted living facility may provide a monetary reward to the resident for making such referral.
(c) Nothing in this chapter modifies requirements under mental health parity laws, including § 3343, § 3571T, or § 3578 of Title 18 or the federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (29 U.S.C.
§ 2504E.
§ 1185a).”.
Enforcement.
SYNOPSIS This Amendment makes the following changes to Senate Bill No.
The Attorney General has the same authority to enforce and carry out this chapter as under Chapter 25 of Title 29 and by §§ 2511 through 2527 and 2531 through 2536 of this title.
32:
§ 2505E.
1.
Penalties.
Identifies additional kinds of payments that are not prohibited.
(a) A person who violates this chapter is subject to a civil penalty, in addition to all costs, of not more than $10,000 per violation.
2.
(b) If the violation is against an elder person or person with a disability, a person who violates this chapter is subject to an additional civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per violation under § 2581 of this title.
Uses enforcement language that is consistent with other chapters in Title 6.
(c) Each day that a wilful violation continues is considered a separate violation.
3.
(d) For the purpose of this chapter, a wilful violation occurs when the person committing the violation knew or should have known that the person’s conduct was prohibited under this chapter.
Clarifies that this Act does not modify any requirements under State or federal mental health parity laws.
§2506E.
Remedies and penalties not exclusive.
The remedies and penalties under this chapter are not exclusive and are in addition to any other procedures, rights, or remedies which exist with respect to any other provisions of law including Subchapter II and Subchapter III of Chapter 25 of this title, actions brought by private parties, or state or federal criminal prosecutions.
SYNOPSIS This Act prohibits the practice known as patient brokering, which is the practice where patient brokers are paid a fee to place insured people in treatment centers so that the treatment centers receive thousands of dollars in insurance claim payments for each patient.
Increasingly, patient brokers fraudulently enroll patients in low-deductible health plans with out- of-network treatment benefits.
Patient brokers target individuals with substance use disorders, who are told that they are receiving their treatment through a scholarship.
Not only does this perpetrate fraud against insurers, when insurance plans are terminated for nonpayment of the premium, individuals are discharged from the treatment program with no services or housing and often in a state that is far from home.
CM Page 4 of 4 Released:
CM Page 1 of 1 Released:
03/13/2019 10:28 AM 5971500071
04/16/2019 04:28 PM 5971500098
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Health & Human Development) in House with 8 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Health & Human Development Committee in House

  5. Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  6. Amendment SA 1 to SB 32 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES

  7. Amendment SA 1 to SB 32 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  8. Reported Out of Committee (Banking, Business & Insurance) in Senate with 3 On Its Merits

  9. Introduced and Assigned to Banking, Business & Insurance Committee in Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 42 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Not signed on (42)

42 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 42 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16001
Democratic 12000
Republican 12000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
Earl G. Jaques Jr. — Yea
Gerald L. Brady — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John J. Viola — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Quinton Johnson — Yea
Raymond Seigfried — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Yea
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Yea
Stephen Smyk — Yea
Valerie Longhurst — Not Voting
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Democratic 9000
Republican 5000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Anthony Delcollo — Yea
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Catherine Cloutier — Yea
Colin Bonini — Yea
David B. McBride — Yea
Ernesto B Lopez — Yea
Harris B. McDowell — Yea
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 32 do?
This Act prohibits the practice known as patient brokering, which is the practice where patient brokers are paid a fee to place insured people in treatment centers so that the treatment centers receive thousands of dollars in insurance claim payments for each patient. Increasingly, patient brokers fraudulently enroll patients in low-deductible health plans with out-of-network treatment benefits. Patient brokers target individuals with substance use disorders, who are told that they are receiving their treatment through a scholarship. Not only does this perpetrate fraud against insurers, when insurance plans are terminated for nonpayment of the premium, individuals are discharged from the treatment program with no services or housing and often in a state that is far from home.
Who sponsors SB 32?
SB 32 is sponsored by Kimberly Williams (Democratic), Edward S. Osienski (Democratic), Debra Heffernan (Democratic), Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha (Democratic), Stephanie T. Bolden (Democratic), Paul S. Baumbach, Andria L. Bennett, Bryan Townsend (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Dave G. Lawson (Republican), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), Melissa Minor-Brown (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), Ray Seigfried (Democratic), Quinton Johnson, David Bentz, Anthony Delcollo, Bruce C. Ennis, and John A. Kowalko.
What is the current status of SB 32?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 14, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 32?
Track SB 32 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 32

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 32

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →