Delaware 150th General Assembly (2019-2020) Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 6 D · 3 R cosponsors

HB 24 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 18 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO COPAYMENT OR COINSURANCE FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2019. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 17 sponsors

    2 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 3 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

This Act would prohibit insurers and pharmacy benefit managers from engaging in the practice of "clawbacks". When the total cost of a prescription drug to an insurer or pharmacy benefits manager is less than a patient's co-pay, the insurer or pharmacy benefits manager keeps the difference in a practice known as a "clawback". According to a March 2018 report issued by the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics based on the Center’s analysis of 2013 data from a large commercial insurer combined with data on national average drug reimbursements, almost 25% of filled pharmacy prescriptions involved a patient co-payment that exceeded the average reimbursement paid by the insurer by more than $2.00. The report further noted that overpayments were more likely to occur on claims for generic drugs than brand drugs and that the total overpayments in the Center’s sample amounted to $135 million.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

43 added · 52 removed

43 line(s) added, 52 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bennett & Sen.
Bennett HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 150th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
Delcollo Reps.
1 TO HOUSE BILL NO.
Bentz, Bush, Dorsey Walker, Heffernan, Jaques, Kowalko, Seigfried, D.
24 AMEND House Bill No.
Short, K.
24 after line 7 and before line 8 by inserting the following and redesignating accordingly:
Williams;
“(2) “Contract price” means the lowest price a pharmacy is paid for the acquisition of a prescription drug based on a contract that a pharmacy has with a carrier or pharmacy benefits manager.
Sens.
“Contract price” includes a dispensing fee set by a contract between a pharmacy and a carrier or pharmacy benefits manager.
Cloutier, Hansen, Pettyjohn, Sokola, Townsend, Wilson HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 150th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO.
(3) “Pharmacy” means as defined in § 2502 of Title 24.”.
24 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 18 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO COPAYMENT OR COINSURANCE FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
24 by deleting lines 9 through 11 in their entirety.
Section 1.
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
Amend Chapter 33, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
24 on line 15 by deleting “retail price of the prescription drug.” after “exceeds the” and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
§ 3350A.
“lesser of one of the following:
Copayment or coinsurance for prescription drugs limited.
(1) The applicable copayment or coinsurance that would apply for the prescription drug in the absence of this section.
(a) Definitions.
(2) The amount an individual would pay for the prescription drug if the individual were paying the usual and customary price.
(1) "Carrier" means any entity that provides health insurance in this State.
(3) The contract price for the prescription drug.”.
"Carrier" includes an insurance company, health service corporation, health maintenance organization, and any other entity providing a plan of health insurance or health benefits subject to state insurance regulation.
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
(2) "Pharmacy benefit manager" means as defined under § 3302A of this title.
24 after line 22 and before line 23 by inserting the following and redesignating accordingly:
(3) “Retail price” means the amount an individual would pay for the prescription drug if the individual purchased the prescription drug without using a health insurance plan, a health benefit plan, or any other source of prescription drug benefits or discounts.
“(2) “Contract price” means the lowest price a pharmacy is paid for the acquisition of a prescription drug based on a contract that a pharmacy has with a carrier or pharmacy benefits manager.
(b) Application.
“Contract price” includes a dispensing fee set by a contract between a pharmacy and a carrier or pharmacy benefits manager.
This section applies to a carrier that provides coverage, either directly or through a pharmacy benefits manager, for prescription drugs under a health insurance policy or contract that is issued or delivered in this State.
(3) “Pharmacy” means as defined in § 2502 of Title 24.”.
(c) A carrier subject to this section may not impose a copayment or coinsurance requirement for a covered prescription drug that exceeds the retail price of the prescription drug.
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
Section 2.
24 by deleting lines 24 through 26 in their entirety.
Amend Subchapter III, Chapter 35, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
FURTHER AMEND House Bill No.
§ 3566A.
24 on line 30 by deleting by deleting “retail price of the prescription drug.” after “exceeds the” and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Copayment or coinsurance for prescription drugs limited.
“lesser of one of the following:
(a) Definitions.
(1) "Carrier" means any entity that provides health insurance in this State.
"Carrier" includes an insurance company, health service corporation, health maintenance organization, and any other entity providing a plan of health insurance or health benefits subject to state insurance regulation.
01/03/2019 02:48 PM (2) "Pharmacy benefit manager" means as defined under § 3302A of this title.
03/14/2019 10:04 AM (1) The applicable copayment or coinsurance that would apply for the prescription drug in the absence of this section.
(3) “Retail price” means the amount an individual would pay for the prescription drug if the individual purchased the prescription drug without using a health insurance plan, a health benefit plan, or any other source of prescription drug benefits or discounts.
(2) The amount an individual would pay for the prescription drug if the individual were paying the usual and customary price.
(b) Application.
(3) The contract price for the prescription drug.”.
This section applies to a carrier that provides coverage, either directly or through a pharmacy benefits manager, for prescription drugs under a health insurance policy or contract that is issued or delivered in this State.
SYNOPSIS This Amendment:
(c) A carrier subject to this section may not impose a copayment or coinsurance requirement for a covered prescription drug that exceeds the retail price of the prescription drug.
(1) Replaces “retail price” with language requiring that a carrier not impose a copayment or coinsurance requirement that exceeds the lesser of one of the following:
Section 3.
(i) the applicable copayment or coinsurance that would apply for the prescription drug in the absence of this section;
This Act applies to health insurance or health benefit plans covered under Sections 1 or 2 of this Act that are issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2020.
(ii) the amount an individual would pay for the prescription drug if the individual were paying the usual and customary price;
SYNOPSIS This Act would prohibit insurers and pharmacy benefit managers from engaging in the practice of "clawbacks".
or (iii) the contract price for the prescription drug.
When the total cost of a prescription drug to an insurer or pharmacy benefits manager is less than a patient's co-pay, the insurer or pharmacy benefits manager keeps the difference in a practice known as a "clawback".
(2) Provides a definition of “contract price” in place of the definition of “retail price”.
According to a March 2018 report issued by the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics based on the Center’s analysis of 2013 data from a large commercial insurer combined with data on national average drug reimbursements, almost 25% of filled pharmacy prescriptions involved a patient co-payment that exceeded the average reimbursement paid by the insurer by more than $2.00.
(3) Adds a definition of “pharmacy” based on its use in the definition of “contract price”.
The report further noted that overpayments were more likely to occur on claims for generic drugs than brand drugs and that the total overpayments in the Center’s sample amounted to $135 million.
01/03/2019 02:48 PM 4801500011
03/14/2019 10:04 AM 4801500034
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Passed By Senate. Votes: 18 YES 3 ABSENT

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Health & Social Services) in Senate with 5 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Health & Social Services Committee in Senate

  5. Passed By House. Votes: 38 YES 3 ABSENT

  6. Amendment HA 1 to HB 24 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

  7. Amendment HA 1 to HB 24 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  8. Reported Out of Committee (Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce) in House with 3 Favorable, 9 On Its Merits

  9. Introduced and Assigned to Economic Development/Banking/Insurance/Commerce Committee in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 45 not signed on

Not signed on (45)

45 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 45 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5002
Democratic 8001
Republican 5000
Total 18003
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Anthony Delcollo — Yea
Bruce C. Ennis — Yea
Catherine Cloutier — Yea
Colin Bonini — Yea
David B. McBride — Yea
Ernesto B Lopez — Not Voting
Harris B. McDowell — Not Voting
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Yea
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Not Voting
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16001
Democratic 10002
Republican 12000
Total 38003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Andria L. Bennett — Yea
David Bentz — Yea
Earl G. Jaques Jr. — Yea
Gerald L. Brady — Yea
John A. Kowalko — Yea
John J. Viola — Yea
John L. Mitchell — Yea
Michael Ramone — Yea
Paul S. Baumbach — Yea
Peter C. Schwartzkopf — Yea
Quinton Johnson — Yea
Raymond Seigfried — Yea
Ruth Briggs King — Yea
Sean Matthews — Yea
Sherry Dorsey Walker — Not Voting
Stephen Smyk — Yea
Valerie Longhurst — Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Not Voting
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Not Voting
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 24 do?
This Act would prohibit insurers and pharmacy benefit managers from engaging in the practice of "clawbacks". When the total cost of a prescription drug to an insurer or pharmacy benefits manager is less than a patient's co-pay, the insurer or pharmacy benefits manager keeps the difference in a practice known as a "clawback". According to a March 2018 report issued by the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics based on the Center’s analysis of 2013 data from a large commercial insurer combined with data on national average drug reimbursements, almost 25% of filled pharmacy prescriptions involved a patient co-payment that exceeded the average reimbursement paid by the insurer by more than $2.00. The report further noted that overpayments were more likely to occur on claims for generic drugs than brand drugs and that the total overpayments in the Center’s sample amounted to $135 million.
Who sponsors HB 24?
HB 24 is sponsored by Kimberly Williams (Democratic), Daniel B. Short (Republican), Debra Heffernan (Democratic), William Bush (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), Stephanie L. Hansen (Democratic), Andria L. Bennett, Anthony Delcollo, Catherine Cloutier, David Bentz, Sherry Dorsey Walker, Earl G. Jaques Jr., John A. Kowalko, and Raymond Seigfried.
What is the current status of HB 24?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 24?
Track HB 24 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 24

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 24

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →