Alcoholic beverages: return of beer to seller.
Shoppers may benefit from better availability of fresh products as businesses manage their stock more effectively.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 436 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 436.
You're tracking SB 436
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 436 — Alcoholic beverages: return of beer to seller.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 1995-1996 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
This bill allows sellers to return unsold beer to distributors.
SB 436 permits sellers to return unsold alcoholic beverages, specifically beer, to their suppliers. This aims to reduce waste and financial loss for sellers.
What this means for you
- Workers: {}
- Consumers: Shoppers may benefit from better availability of fresh products as businesses manage their stock more effectively.
- Small Business: This means small businesses can minimize losses from unsold beer by returning it to suppliers.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 436 includes a new section that outlines additional provisions, which were not present in the previous draft. This change aims to clarify certain aspects of the bill and ensure that all stakeholders have a better understanding of the requirements. The addition is important because it can impact how the bill is implemented and who it affects. By making these clarifications, lawmakers are working to improve the effectiveness of the bill and address any concerns from the public or other lawmakers.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Chaptered 07/11/95 - Chaptered Current pdf July 11, 1995
- SB436 View text html
Sponsors
- Rosenthal · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Rosenthal
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 436?
- SB 436 is sponsored by Rosenthal.
- What is the current status of SB 436?
- This bill died with 1995-1996 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 436?
- Track SB 436 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 436
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 436
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →